green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
Quoted verbatim 3×
10.7 score
“thus, as a general rule, stockholders, employees, and creditors of an injured company ... have all been denied recovery because their injuries were too 'indirect,' 'secondary' or 'remote”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 38 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
David Weaver Adams v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., a Domestic Corporation John Eric Clifton v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., a Domestic Corporation John Eric Clifton v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., a Domestic Corporation Appeal of Union De Transports Aeriens. (Two Cases) David Weaver Adams v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., a Domestic Corporation
But see Bichan v. Chemetron Corp., 681 F.2d 514 (7th Cir.1982) (employee denied standing under similar circumstances), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1261 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983).
cited
Cited "but see"
Adams v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
But see Bichan v. Chemetron Corp., 681 F.2d 514 (7th Cir. 1982) (employee denied standing under similar circumstances), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1261 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hessey v. Burden
within the general equitable powers of the court is the authority to enforce orders of the mayor and of administrative agencies
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Capital Nat. Bank of New York v. McDonald's Corp.
s a general rule, stockholders, employees, and creditors of an injured company ... have all been denied recovery because their injuries were too 'indirect,' 'secondary,' or 'remote.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ashley Meadows Farm, Inc. v. American Horse Shows Ass'n
thus, as a general rule, stockholders, employees, and creditors of an injured company ... have all been denied recovery because their injuries were too 'indirect,' 'secondary' or 'remote
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Braxston L. Banks v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
(2×)
Id. at 515.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Koefoot v. American College of Surgeons
First, the court must determine whether the plaintiff’s injury is an “antitrust injury” which is “inextricably related to, and caused by, the alleged anti-competitive conduct.” Id. at 515, citing Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477 , 97 S.Ct. 690 , 50 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977); Weit v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co., 641 F.2d 457 (7th Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Gibbs v. Donnelly
See Ramirez v. Jones, 683 F.2d 712, 716 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1260 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David Osborne
See United States v. Guilbert, 692 F.2d 1340, 1343 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1260 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983); United States v. Dupree, 544 F.2d 1050, 1051 (9th Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hughes v. Halbach & Braun Industries, Ltd.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See In re Industrial Gas Antitrust Litigation, 681 F.2d 514 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1261 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983) (holding that a former corporate president who had been terminated from employment and blacklisted by the industry did not suffer an antitrust injury so as to give him standing); Fallis v. Pendleton Woolen Mills, Inc., 866 F.2d 209 (6th Cir.1989) (denying antitrust standing to an employee who was allegedly terminated for refusal to participate in a vertical price fixing scheme); O’Regan v. Arbitration Forums, Inc., 121 F.3d 1060, 1065 (7th Cir.1997)…
cited
Cited "see"
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
See District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Central Labor Council, AFL-CIO, 442 A.2d 110, 114 (D.C.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1261 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allen v. City of Los Angeles
See United States v. Guilbert, 692 F.2d 1340, 1344 (11th Cir.1982) (discussing intent in federal criminal context), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1260 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983); Shaffer v. United States, 308 F.2d 654, 655 (5th Cir.1962) (same), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 939 , 83 S.Ct. 1544 , 10 L.Ed.2d 694 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5862, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9569 Byrant Allen Freddie G. Helms Rodney Glenn King v. City of Los Angeles v. Stacey C. Koon, Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Byrant Allen Freddie G. Helms Rodney Glenn King v. City of Los Angeles v. Laurence M. Powell, Cross-Claimant-Appellant
See United States v. Guilbert, 692 F.2d 1340, 1344 (11th Cir.1982) (discussing intent in federal criminal context), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1260 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983); Shaffer v. United States, 308 F.2d 654, 655 (5th Cir.1962) (same), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 939 , 83 S.Ct. 1544 , 10 L.Ed.2d 694 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
Railco Multi-Construction Company v. Robert Gardner and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor
See D.C.Code § 36-301, et seq. (1988). 4 See generally District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Central Labor Council, 442 A.2d 110, 115-17 (D.C.1982) (upholding Council’s authority under Self-Government Act to repeal the 1928 Act as an Act of Congress “restricted in its application exclusively in or to the District”), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1261 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
William Kenny Stephens, Cross-Appellee v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent- Cross-Appellant
(2×)
See Mason v. Balkcom, 669 F.2d 222, 227 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1260 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983). 5 This case is not that kind of case, however.
discussed
Cited "see"
Weyman H. House, Jr. v. Bob L. Lavoie, Warden, Dodge County Correctional Institute
(2×)
See Mason v. Balkcom, 669 F.2d 222, 227 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982) (plea of self-defense does not necessarily concede intent to kill), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1260 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Peter H. Joe
See United States v. Guilbert, 692 F.2d 1340, 1344 (11th Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1260 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983); Iron Shell, 633 F.2d at 88 (§ 113(d) offense constitutes common law battery).
cited
Cited "see"
Ronald L. Hall and Laura Hall v. C & P Telephone Company
See District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Central Labor Council, 442 A.2d 110, 116-117 (D.C.C.A.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1261 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Hughes v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
See District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Central Labor Council, AFL-CIO, 442 A.2d 110 (D.C.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1261 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
O'DONNELL v. Kusper
(2×)
Raney & Sons, 388 F.Supp. 1184 (E.D.Ark.) aff'd 521 F.2d 795 (8th Cir.1975) (denying a taxpayer standing to bring an antitrust action on his own behalf); See abo In re Industrial Gas Antitrust Litigation, 681 F.2d 514 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1261 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983) (dismissing an employee’s antitrust action for lack of standing, in part, because "... his injury [was] simply too remote from the alleged illegal conduct.” Id. at 519). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerald M. Hollow
See United States v. Guilbert, 692 F.2d 1340, 1343 (11th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1260 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Garnett William Cape v. Robert Francis, Warden
(2×)
See Mason v. Balkcom, 669 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1260 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983). 9 We disagree with the state that anticipation of an insanity defense justified introduction of the psychiatric testimony.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth D. Kroesser, Roger D. Harmon
(2×)
See Mason v. Balkcom, 669 F.2d 222, 227 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982), cert. denied, — U.S. ——, 103 S.Ct. 1260 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983) (“where the evidence of guilt is so overwhelming that the error could not have been a contributing factor in the decision to convict,” an erroneous jury instruction is harmless error).
discussed
Cited "see"
Garrett v. Washington Air Compressor Co., Inc.
Code §§ 36-301 through 36-345 (1981 & 1983 Supp.); see District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Central Labor Council, 442 A.2d 110 , rehearing en banc denied, 445 A.2d 960 (D.C. 1982), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 1261 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Guyton v. LeFevre
(2×)
See Ramirez v. Jones, 683 F.2d 712, 715 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 1260 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983) (language in charge “jury has the right to infer from the results produced, the intention to effect such result” following presumption language did not prevent shifting of burden of proof).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Gabriel Duran, United States of America v. Leo Herman Monroe, Sr.
See United States v. Joe, 831 F.2d 218, 220 (10th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1072 , 108 S.Ct. 1043 , 98 L.Ed.2d 1006 (1988); United States v. Johnson, 637 F.2d 1224 , 1242 n. 26 (9th Cir.1980); see also United States v. Guilbert, 692 F.2d 1340, 1345 (11th Cir.1982) (affirming defendant’s convictions for both assault with a dangerous weapon and assault by striking, beating or wounding even though convictions stemmed from a single incident and a single victim), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1260 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Umana v. Swidler & Berlin, Chartered
(2×)
See, e.g., District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Central Labor Council, 442 A.2d 110, 117-18 (D.C.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1261 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983); District of Columbia v. Sullivan, 436 A.2d 364, 365-68 (D.C.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Judith Nelson and Darci Anne Bowman, Cross-Appellees v. Monroe Regional Medical Center, Formerly Known as the Monroe Clinic, Cross-Appellant
(2×)
Ball, 784 F.2d at 1334 (“the ‘antitrust injury’ rule applies to requests for damages and injunctions alike”) (a Section 1 or 2 claim); Havoco, 626 F.2d at 556 (“as with all antitrust claims”); see also In re Industrial Gas Antitrust Litigation, 681 F.2d 514, 515 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1261 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983) (a Section 1 claim); Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477 , 97 S.Ct. 690 , 50 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977) (a Section 7 claim).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boisjoly v. Morton Thiokol, Inc.
See, e.g., In re Industrial Gas Antitrust Litigation, 681 F.2d 514 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1261 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983) (employee discharged and blacklisted by industry for refusing to participate in antitrust activity lacks standing to bring action against his former employer); McNulty v. Borden, Inc., 542 F.Supp. 655 (E.D.Pa.1982) (no standing for employee discharged for refusing to partic *805 ipate); see also Perry v. Hartz Mountain Corp., 537 F.Supp. 1387 (S.D.Ind.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Melvin Max Malone
Healy held, however, that “[a]n erroneous instruction, even though it pertains to an element that was in issue at the trial, is harmless error if the evidence of guilt is so overwhelming that the error could not have contributed to the jury’s decision to convict.” Id. at 701 ; see also Mason v. Balkcom, 669 F.2d 222, 226-27 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1260 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983). *673 In the present case, an instruction pertaining to an element in issue at the trial— specific intent — was arguably erroneous.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fitzgerald
See also United States v. Guilbert, 692 F.2d 1340, 1345 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1260 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983) (noting "§ 113(c) requires proof of intent to do bodily harm, whereas § 133(d) requires no specific intent of any kind”). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eileen Dimond v. District of Columbia, Eileen Dimond v. District of Columbia State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Eileen Dimond v. District of Columbia
See, e.g., District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Central Labor Council, 442 A.2d 110 (D.C.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1261 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983) (workers' compensation act did not redefine authority of local or federal courts); District of Columbia v. Sullivan, 436 A.2d 364 (D.C.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dimond v. District of Columbia
See, e.g., District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Central Labor Council, 442 A.2d 110 (D.C.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1261 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983) (workers’ compensation act did not redefine authority of local or federal courts); District of Columbia v. Sullivan, 436 A.2d 364 (D.C.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gregory Marketing Corporation and Daniel Scher v. Wakefern Food Corporation and Red Cheek, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., In re Industrial Gas Litigation, 681 F.2d 514, 519 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1261 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983); McNulty v. Borden, 542 F.Supp. 655 (E.D.Pa.1982); Callahan v. Scott Paper Co., 541 F.Supp. 550 (E.D.Pa.1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Langley v. Ryder
Compare United States v. Guilbert, 692 F.2d 1340 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1260 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983), with State v. Trahan, 416 So.2d 65 (La.1982). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Peter Jacob Spotted Warbonnet A/K/A Pete Spot
See also United States v. Guilbert, 692 F.2d 1340, 1344 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 1260 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983) (intent “is to be judged objectively from the conduct of the actor and what we in the position of the victim might reasonably conclude”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ronald Clark O'Bryan v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent
(2×)
McCorquodale v. Balkcom, 705 F.2d 1553, 1561 (11th Cir.1983) (Kravitch, J., dissenting); see also Mason v. Balkcom, 487 F.Supp. 554, 560 (M.D.Ga.1980) (noting trial judge's opportunity to observe and listen to juror, but engaging in independent analysis of Witherspoon challenge), rev'd on other grounds, 669 F.2d 222 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 1260 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Industrial Gas Antitrust Litigation
See, e.g., In re Industrial Gas Litigation, 681 F.2d 514 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 1261 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bichan
v.
Chemetron Corp.
v.
Chemetron Corp.
No. 82-493.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 28, 1983.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (2) · District of Columbia Court of … (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari, vacate the judgment, and remand the case for further consideration in light of Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. Carpenters, 459 U. S. 519 (1983).