green
Positive treatment
6.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Vincent R. Tamburello v. Comm-Tract Corporation, John F. Polmonari, Edward Menard, and Steven Dickie
But see United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 931-33 (3d Cir.1982) (concluding that Garmon does not apply to conflicts between the NLRA and federal statutes), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Volmar Distributors, Inc. v. New York Post Co., Inc.
See United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 931 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983) (scheme to defraud employees of. loyal, faithful, and honest service from their union officials constitutes mail fraud). 9 However, the RICO statute only allows those plaintiffs “injured in [their] business or property by reason of a violation of section 1962” to sue. . 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (c).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter Esposito
See United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 938 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Romaine Phillips, at No. 88-1136. United States of America v. Matthias Brown, A/K/A \Sonny
See United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 937 (3d Cir.1982) (upholding a jury instruction where district court defined “racketeering activity” “as the commission of ‘at least two of the acts of racketeering alleged in the indictment’ ”), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alan R. Stoneman
See United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 926 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Athanasios Theodoropoulos, A/K/A \Tommy\". Appeal of Athanasios Theodoropoulos. United States of America v. George Karivalis
See United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 933 (3d Cir.1982) cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983); United States v. Dansker, 537 F.2d 40, 51 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Theodoropoulos
See United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 933 (3d Cir.1982) cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983); United States v. Dansker, 537 F.2d 40, 51 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Menelao Orlando Estevez, Appeal of Jose Guillermo Haro
Fed.R.Crim.P. 7(c)(2); see United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 939 (3d Cir.1982) (indictment charging appellant’s interests in certain corporations subject to forfeiture sufficiently alleged extent of interests for purposes of Rule 7(c)(2)), certiorari denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Caporale
See United States v. Colacurcio, 659 F.2d 684 , 688 n. 4 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1002 , 102 S.Ct. 1635 , 71 L.Ed.2d 869 (1982); accord, United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 935-36 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Caporale, Alfred Pilotto, Seymour A. Gopman, Bernard Rubin, George Wuagneux, Salvatore Tricario, Louis C. Ostrer, and John Giardiello, Defendants- United States of America v. Seymour Gopman, Salvatore Tricario, George Wuagneux, Louis C. Ostrer, John Giardiello, James Caporale, Alfred Pilotto and Bernard Rubin, Defendants
See United States v. Colacurcio, 659 F.2d 684 , 688 n. 4 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1002 , 102 S.Ct. 1635 , 71 L.Ed.2d 869 (1982); accord, United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 935-36 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983) 21 Appellants argue that the comments of another juror, Jo Anne Allen, also establish a basis for a mistrial on grounds of bias.
discussed
Cited "see"
Khalsa v. Weinberger
See Nieszner v. Mark, 684 F.2d 562, 564 (8th Cir.1982) ("We do not agree with the Third Circuit's conclusion that the Mindes analysis requires the court to consider the merits of a case in making a threshold determination of reviewability"), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1273 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983). 27 We hold that the district court did not improperly consider disputed facts in deciding that military appearance regulations are nonreviewable.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Castellano
See United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 937 (3d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983); United States v. Melton, 689 F.2d 679, 683 (7th Cir.1982); United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1136 (1st Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Khalsa v. Weinberger
See Nieszner v. Mark, 684 F.2d 562, 564 (8th Cir.1982) (“We do not agree with the Third Circuit’s conclusion that the Mindes analysis requires the court to consider the merits of a case in making a threshold determination of reviewability”), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1273 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Khalsa v. Weinberger
See Nieszner v. Mark, 684 F.2d 562, 564 (8th Cir.1982) (“We do not agree with the Third Circuit’s conclusion that the Mindes analysis requires the court to consider the merits of a case in making a threshold determination of reviewability”), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1273 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Khalsa v. Weinberger
See Nieszner v. Mark, 684 F.2d 562, 564 (8th Cir.1982) ("We do not agree with the Third Circuit's conclusion that the Mindes analysis requires the court to consider the merits of a case in making a threshold determination of reviewability"), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1273 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983). 25 We hold that the district court did not improperly consider disputed facts in deciding that military appearance regulations are nonreviewable.
discussed
Cited "see"
Spiegel v. Continental Illinois National Bank
See United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 929 (3d Cir.1982) (scheme to defraud employees of National Labor Relation Act not within mail fraud statute where Congress intended NLRA to be exclusive), cert, denied, 460 U.S. 1022 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cortez
See United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 937 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cortez
See United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 937 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Shaw v. Gwatney
See Nieszner v. Mark, 684 F.2d 562, 564 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 1273 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Robert B. Reich, Secretary, United States Department of Labor
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 , 460 U.S. 1028 , 103 S.Ct. 1280 , 75 L.Ed.2d 501 (1983); cf. Hubbard v. United Airlines, 927 F.2d 1094 (9th Cir.1991) (examining conflicts between Railway Labor Act and RICO).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leslie Ray Cox R.M. Cox Larry Driver Barry Nichols John Bullard Robert W. Kennedy, Jr. Lorenzo G. East Clarence M. Pope, Jr. C.R. Altes Jack E. Merrymon Terry P. West R.S. Arnold M.W. Milstead J.W. Wade Manning A.C. Snider Terry H. Melvin Thomas E. Hill Gary D. Swann Ronald E. Frazier Anthony J. Crapet Robert M. Green Heath L. McMeans III Billy Carter Joe A. Knight, George Boglin, Wardell Clark, Phillip L. Drummond, Don L. Flurry, Dennis R. Fulton, Dennis E. Jones, W.T. Mayberry, James R. Miller, Willie J. Nation, Oscar Lee Perry, Robert Poole, Brack Wells, Willie Young, Harry S. Turner v. Administrator United States Steel & Carnegie and United States Steel & Carnegie Pension Fund, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc and Usx Corporation, A/K/A United States Steel Corporation, Leslie Ray Cox, R.M. Cox, Larry Driver, Barry Nichols, John Bullard, Robert W. Kennedy, Jr., Lorenzo G. East, Clarence M. Pope, C.R. Altes, Jack E. Merrymon, Terry P. West, R.S. Arnold, M.W. Milstead, J.W. Wade, A.C. Snider, Terry H. Melvin, Thomas E. Hill, Gary D. Swann, Ronald E. Frazier, Anthony J. Crapet, Robert M. Green, Heath L. McMeans Iii, Billy Carter, Joe A. Knight, George Boglin, Wardell Clark, Phillip L. Drummond, Don L. Flurry, Dennis R. Fulton, Dennis E. Jones, W.T. Mayberry, James R. Miller, Willie J. Nation, Oscar Lee Perry, Robert Poole, Brack Wells, Willie Young, Harry S. Turner v. Administrator United States Steel & Carnegie, United States Steel & Carnegie Pension Fund, Usx Corporation, A/K/A United States Steel Corporation
See, e.g., United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 935-36 (3d Cir.1982) (holding that a reasonable jury could find that each monthly lease payment made to secure use of an automobile for a union official for four months constituted a separate predicate act under RICO), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cox v. Administrator United States Steel & Carnegie
See, e.g., United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 935-36 (3d Cir.1982) (holding that a reasonable jury could find that each monthly lease payment made to secure use of an automobile for a union official for four months constituted a separate predicate act under RICO), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Britt v. Grocers Supply Co., Inc.
See, e.g., Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers Int'l Ass'n Local Union No. 6, 493 U.S. 67 , 110 S.Ct. 424, 919 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983), the issue was whether the doctrine of primary jurisdiction operated to displace a federal criminal statute that independently prohibited conduct that is also arguably prohibited by the NLRA.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frank Runnels
See, e.g., United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 931 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983) (right of union members to honest and faithful services of union officials); United States v. Margiotta, 688 F.2d 108, 121 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 913 , 103 S.Ct. 1891 , 77 L.Ed.2d 282 (1983) (rights of citizens to have government conducted honestly and free from corruption and fraud); and United States v. Curry, 681 F.2d 406, 411 (5th Cir.1982) (chairman of citizens' political action organization owed a duty of faithful service to the committee…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rastelli
See also United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 930 (3d Cir.1982) (holding that deprivation of “economic benefits [employees] enjoyed through rights they had under the collective bargaining agreement[ ]” constituted property for purposes of the mail fraud statute and intimating that such a deprivation is a deprivation of a tangible property interest), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983); United States v. S & Vee Cartage Co., 704 F.2d 914, 921 (6th Cir.) (corporation’s scheme to defraud pension fund, welfare fund, and employees of contributions required und…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rastelli
See also United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 930 (3d Cir.1982) (holding that deprivation of "economic benefits [employees] enjoyed through rights they had under the collective bargaining agreement[ ]" constituted property for purposes of the mail fraud statute and intimating that such a deprivation is a deprivation of a tangible property interest), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983); United States v. S & Vee Cartage Co., 704 F.2d 914, 921 (6th Cir.) (corporation's scheme to defraud pension fund, welfare fund, and employees of contributions required under col…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Whitty
See also United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 937 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard L. BRITT and Timothy Jackson, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs– v. The GROCERS SUPPLY COMPANY, INC
See, e.g., Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers Int'l Ass'n Local Union No. 6, 493 U.S. 67 , 110 S.Ct. 424, 919 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983), the issue was whether the doctrine of primary jurisdiction operated to displace a federal criminal statute that independently prohibited conduct that is also arguably prohibited by the NLRA.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Day
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
No. 82-931.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 7, 1983.
Published
Ct. App. Tex., 1st Sup. Jud. Dist. Certiorari denied.