green
Positive treatment
6.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. State
See Hoggard v. State, 277 Ark. 117 , 640 S.W.2d 102 (1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1273 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bryant v. Secretary of the Army
(2×)
See Muir v. Alabama Educational Television Commission, 688 F.2d 1033, 1041 (5th Cir.1982) (holding that public television stations were not “public forums”), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1274 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zady Natey, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, Local No. 27
(2×)
Workers of America, 771 F.Supp. 208, 211, 214 (S.D.Ohio 1991); accord Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 243, 683 F.2d 154, 155 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1274 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983); Inter-City Gas Corp. v. Boise Cascade Corp., 845 F.2d 184, 187 (8th Cir.1988) (arbitrator amends or alters agreement if interprets unambiguous language in way different from plain meaning).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ficks Reed Co. v. Local 112 International Union, Allied Industrial Workers
(2×)
See Sears Roebuck and Co. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 243, 683 F.2d 154, 156 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1274 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Serra v. United States General Services Administration
(2×)
Emerson, The System of Freedom of Expression 700 (1970)); see Muir v. Alabama Educational Television Comm'n, 688 F.2d 1033 , 1044 (5th Cir.1982) (in banc) (“the First Amendment does not preclude the government from exercising editorial control over its own medium of expression”), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1274 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard Serra v. United States General Services Administration
(2×)
Emerson, The System of Freedom of Expression 700 (1970)); see Muir v. Alabama Educational Television Comm'n, 688 F.2d 1033 , 1044 (5th Cir.1982) (in banc) ("the First Amendment does not preclude the government from exercising editorial control over its own medium of expression"), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1274 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kaplan v. Shapiro
See Meyer v. Thomas & McKinnon Auchincloss Kohlmeyer, Inc., 686 F.2d 818, 819 (9th Cir.1982) (No vertical commonality in situations where “the promoter continued to profit through commissions even as the account lost money [or where,] had the account been successful, the promoter would not necessarily have shared the benefits because [the investor] could elect to withdraw profits as they accrued”), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1275 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cinevision Corp. v. City of Burbank
(2×)
See Muir v. Alabama Educational Television Commission, 688 F.2d 1033, 1043-47 (5th Cir.1982) (en banc), cert, denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1274 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983); Canby, The First Amendment and the State as Editor: Implications for Public Broadcasting, 52 Tex.L.Rev. 1123, 1148-65 (1974). 18 A court must, however, scrutinize closely a government’s dedication of a forum to a particular type of expression and fully consider a number of factors before deciding the constitutionality of such an action.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cinevision Corporation, a Corporation, Wolf and Rissmiller Concerts, a Corporation v. City of Burbank, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California, and Jim Richman, Cinevision Corporation, a Corporation, and Wolf and Rissmiller Concerts, a Corporation v. City of Burbank, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California and Jim Richman, Cinevision Corporation, a Corporation, and Wolf and Rissmiller Concerts, a Corporation v. City of Burbank, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California and Jim Richman, Cinevision Corporation, a Corporation, Wolf and Rissmiller Concerts, a Corporation v. City of Burbank, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California, and Jim Richman
(2×)
See Muir v. Alabama Educational Television Commission, 688 F.2d 1033, 1043-47 (5th Cir.1982) (en banc), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1274 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983); Canby, The First Amendment and the State as Editor: Implications for Public Broadcasting, 52 Tex.L.Rev. 1123, 1148-65 (1974). 18 45 A court must, however, scrutinize closely a government's dedication of a forum to a particular type of expression and fully consider a number of factors before deciding the constitutionality of such an action.
discussed
Cited "see"
In re the Arbitration between Local 345 of the Retail Store Employees Union & Heinrich Motors, Inc.
Co. [Martin], 15 NY2d 380, 382-383 , citing Teamsters Local v Lucas Flour Co., 369 US 95 ) to the effect that an award which disregards clear and unambiguous contract language is beyond the arbitrator’s power; see Sears, Roebuck & Co. v Teamsters Local Union No. 243, 683 F2d 154, cert den __ US _, 103 S Ct 1274 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 1842, Afl-Cio v. Cincinnati Electronics Corporation
(2×)
See, e.g., Sears, Roebuck & Co., Local Union No. 245 v. Teamsters, 683 F.2d 154, 155-56 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1274 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983); Storer Broadcasting Co. v. American Federation of Television & Radio Artists, 600 F.2d 45, 47 (6th Cir.1979); Detroit Coil Co. v. International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, 594 F.2d 575, 579 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gene Mcgill v. American Land & Exploration Company
See, e.g., Meyer v. Thomas & McKinnon Auchincloss Kohlmeyer, Inc., 686 F.2d 818 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1275 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983); S.E.C. v. Continental Commodities Corp., 497 F.2d 516 (5th Cir.1974); cf. Booth v. Peavey Co. Commodities Services, 430 F.2d 132 (8th Cir.1970) 4 Our common sense conclusion that there was a "common enterprise" is buttressed by the language of the joint venture agreement, which provides, inter alia: ... [Commercial Funding Corporation] and [Gene McGill] desire to become associated in business for the development and sale of lots i…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McGill v. American Land & Exploration Co.
See, e.g., Meyer v. Thomas & McKinnon Auchincloss Kohlmeyer, Inc., 686 F.2d 818 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1275 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983); S.E.C. v. Continental Commodities Corp., 497 F.2d 516 (5th Cir.1974); cf. Booth v. Peavey Co. Commodities Services, 430 F.2d 132 (8th Cir.1970). .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Edward Hines Lumber Company of Oregon v. Lumber and Sawmill Workers Local No. 2588 and Central Oregon District Council, Lpiw
(4×)
See e.g., Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 243, 683 F.2d 154, 156 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1274 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Iowa City Community School District v. Iowa City Education Ass'n
(4×)
See, e.g., Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 243, 683 F.2d 154, 155-56 (6th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 1274 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983); Mistletoe Express Service v. Motor Expressmen's Union, 566 F.2d 692, 695 (10th Cir.1977); Litvak Packing Co. v. Amalgamated Butcher Workmen, Local No. 641, 455 F.Supp. 1180, 1182 (D.Colo.1978); Caribou Board of Education v. Caribou Teachers Association, 404 A.2d 212, 215 (Me.1979); Simpson v. North Collins Central School District, 56 A.D.2d 166, 171-72 , 392 N.Y.S.2d 107, 110 (1977), aff'd, 43 N.Y.2d 976 , 375 N.E.2d 776 ,…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
v.
Norman
v.
Norman
No. 82-1182.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 7, 1983.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.