green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Hiland
United States v. Huckaby, 698 F.2d 915, 919 (8th Cir.1982) (allegation in indictment that defendant acted with intent to defraud implied defendant “knew what she was concealing”), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1070 , 103 S. Ct.. 1526, 75 L.Ed.2d 948 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fontaine v. Ryan
See Cullen v. BMW of North America, 691 F.2d 1097, 1101 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1070 , 103 S.Ct. 1525 , 75 L.Ed.2d 948 (1983); Silver v. Sheraton-Smithtown, 504 N.Y.S.2d at 57 ; Ward v. State, 81 Misc.2d 583 , 366 N.Y.Süd 800, 807 (Ct.Cl.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nicholas Uccio
See United States v. LoRusso, 695 F.2d 45, 53 (2d Cir.1982) (“ ‘whether the case sub judice be civil or criminal[,] so long as the district court has jurisdiction over the case, it possesses inherent power over interlocutory orders, and can reconsider them when it is consonant with justice to do so’ ”) (quoting United States v. Jerry, 487 F.2d 600, 605 (3d Cir.1973)), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1070 , 103 S.Ct. 1525 , 75 L.Ed.2d 948 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Spurr
Accord, e.g., United States v. LoRusso, 695 F.2d 45 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied sub. nom., Errante v. United States, 460 U.S. 1070 , 103 S.Ct. 1525 , 75 L.Ed.2d 948 (1983); Evans v. State, 574 P.2d 24 (Alaska 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cullen v. Margiotta
See United States v. Lo-Russo, 695 F.2d 45, 53 (2d Cir.1982) (“ ‘whether the case sub judice be civil or criminal[,] so long as the district court has jurisdiction over the case, it possesses inherent power over interlocutory orders, and can reconsider them when it is consonant with justice to do so’ ”) (quoting United States v. Jerry, 487 F.2d 600, 605 (3d Cir.1973)), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1970 , 103 S.Ct. 1525 , 75 L.Ed.2d 948 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cullen v. Margiotta
See United States v. LoRusso, 695 F.2d 45, 53 (2d Cir.1982) (" 'whether the case sub judice be civil or criminal[,] so long as the district court has jurisdiction over the case, it possesses inherent power over interlocutory orders, and can reconsider them when it is consonant with justice to do so' ") (quoting United States v. Jerry, 487 F.2d 600, 605 (3d Cir.1973)), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1970 , 103 S.Ct. 1525 , 75 L.Ed.2d 948 (1983). 65 We turn, therefore, to the merits of the dismissals challenged on this appeal. 66 III.
discussed
Cited "see"
National Revenue Corporation v. Arlene Violet, Attorney General of the State of Rhode Island
(2×)
See Silver v. Woolf, 694 F.2d 8, 14 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 1525 , 75 L.Ed.2d 948 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Fustok v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.
See, e.g., Ney v. Yellow Cab Co., 2 Ill.2d 74, 84 , 117 N.E.2d 74, 80 (1954); Havas v. Victory Stock Paper Co., 49 N.Y.2d 381, 388 , 402 N.E.2d 1136, 1139 , 426 N.Y.S.2d 233, 237 (1980); accord Cullen v. BMW of North America, 691 F.2d 1097, 1103 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1070 , 103 S.Ct. 1525 , 75 L.Ed.2d 948 (1983) (Oakes, J., dissenting).
discussed
Cited "see"
George L. Govoni v. Bricklayers, Masons and Plasterers International Union of America, Local No. 5 Pension Fund and Plymouth-Home National Bank
See Coward v. Colgate Palmolive Co., 686 F.2d 1230, 1235 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 1526 , 75 L.Ed.2d 948 (1983); Van Fossan v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Union Local 710 Pension Fund, 649 F.2d 1243, 1246-47 (7th Cir.1981); Ponce v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California, 628 F.2d 537, 541 (9th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sheridan Road Baptist Church v. Department of Education
Accord, State v Rivinius, 328 NW2d 220 (ND, 1982), cert den, 75 L Ed 2d 948 (1983); Meyerkorth v State, 173 Neb 889; 115 NW2d 585 (1962), app dis, 372 US 705 (1963); New Jersey State Board of Higher Education v Shelton College, 90 NJ 470; 448 A2d 988 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marcos-Quiroga
See, e.g., United States v. LoRusso, 695 F.2d 45, 53 (2d Cir.1982) (“[Wjhether the case sub judice be civil or criminal,] so long as the district court has jurisdiction over the case, it possesses inherent power over interlocutory orders, and can reconsider them when it is consonant with justice to do so.”) (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1070 , 103 S.Ct. 1525 , 75 L.Ed.2d 948 (1983); accord United States v. Aguirre, 214 F.3d 1122, 1124 (9th Cir.2000) (“[DJistrict courts generally have ‘inherent authority’ to decide motions for reconsideration and rehearing…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Honken
See, e.g., United States v. LoRusso, 695 F.2d 45, 53 (2d Cir.1982) (“[W]hether the case sub judice be civil or criminal,] so long as the district court has jurisdiction over the case, it possesses inherent power over interlocutory orders, and can reconsider them when it is consonant with justice to do so.”) (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1070 , 103 S.Ct. 1525 , 75 L.Ed.2d 948 (1983); accord United States v. Aguirre, 214 F.3d 1122, 1124 (9th Cir.2000) (“[District courts generally have ‘inherent authority’ to decide motions for reconsideration and rehearing …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bulman v. Hulstrand Construction Co., Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Rivinius, 328 N.W.2d 220 (N.D.1982), cert. denied 460 U.S. 1070 , 103 S.Ct. 1525 , 75 L.Ed.2d 948 (1983) [State constitutional provisions have equal standing].
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edgar Vargas, Nidia Campos, and Mario Campos
See, e.g., United States v. LoRusso, 695 F.2d 45 , 56 n. 8 (2d Cir.1982) (defendant’s own statement referring to “his people” provided evidence that he had entered into agreements with others), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1070 , 103 S.Ct. 1525 , 75 L.Ed.2d 948 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Uselton v. Commercial Lovelace Motor Freight, Inc.
See, e.g., Coward v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., 686 F.2d 1230, 1236-37 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1070 , 103 S.Ct. 1526 , 75 L.Ed.2d 948 (1983); Cunha, 545 F.Supp. at 99-100 ; O'Neil, 538 F.Supp. at 1031 ; Tanuggi, 471 F.Supp. at 1214, 1216 ; Newkirk v. General Elec.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Uselton v. Commercial Lovelace Motor Freight, Inc.
See, e.g., Coward v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., 686 F.2d 1230, 1236-37 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1070 , 103 S.Ct. 1526 , 75 L.Ed.2d 948 (1983); Cunha, 545 F.Supp. at 99—100; O’Neil, 538 F.Supp. at 1031 ; Tanuggi, 471 F.Supp. at 1214, 1216 ; Newkirk v. General Elec.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Willie R. Francis
See, e.g., United States v. LoRusso, 695 F.2d 45 , 55 n. 5 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1070 , 103 S.Ct. 1525 , 75 L.Ed.2d 948 (1983); United States v. Heathington, 545 F.2d 972, 973 (5th Cir.1977) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Healy
See Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways Corp., 450 U.S. 662, 671 , 101 S.Ct. 1309, 1316 , 67 L.Ed.2d 580 (1981) (plurality) (Iowa law prohibiting 65-ft. double-trailer trucks “now out of step with the laws of all other Midwestern and Western States”); Raymond Motor Transp., 434 U.S. at 445 , 98 S.Ct. 796 (Wisconsin double-truck length limitations prevented interline transfers “from carriers that operate only in the 33 States where the doubles are legal”); Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc., 359 U.S. 520, 527-28 , 79 S.Ct. 962, 966-67 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1959) (interference with interline …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re The Beer Institute
See Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways Corp., 450 U.S. 662, 671 , 101 S.Ct. 1309, 1316 , 67 L.Ed.2d 580 (1981) (plurality) (Iowa law prohibiting 65-ft. double-trailer trucks "now out of step with the laws of all other Midwestern and Western States"); Raymond Motor Transp., 434 U.S. at 445 , 98 S.Ct. 796 (Wisconsin double-truck length limitations prevented interline transfers "from carriers that operate only in the 33 States where the doubles are legal"); Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc., 359 U.S. 520, 527-28 , 79 S.Ct. 962, 966-67 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1959) (interference with interline transfer…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Calvin W. Breit
See, e.g., United States v. LoRusso, 695 F.2d 45, 52-53 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1070 , 103 S.Ct. 1525 , 75 L.Ed.2d 948 (1983); United States v. Jerry, 487 F.2d 600, 604-605 (3d Cir.1973).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Taylor
See also Silver v. Woolf, 694 F.2d 8, 13 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 1525 , 75 L.Ed.2d 948 (1983). 4 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Babiarz v. Hartford Special, Inc.
Cal. 1978); see also Coward v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., 686 F.2d 1230 (7th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1070 , 103 S. Ct. 1526 , 75 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William J. Farrah
See also, United States v. LoRusso, 695 F.2d 45 (2nd Cir.1982), cert, denied,-U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 1525 , 75 L.Ed.2d 948 (1983) (district court had power to rescind order dismissing one count of indictment); United States v. Green, 414 F.2d 1174 (D.C.Cir.1969) (trial judge had authority to withdraw oral ruling granting defense motion to dismiss indictment).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tassone
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-1416.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 4, 1983.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.