green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.5 score
“expecting privacy in a building staircase accessible to other tenants and the general public cannot be considered reasonable.”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
State v. Scioscia
But see United States v. Dickens, 695 F. 2d 765 (3 Cir.1982), cert. den. 460 U.S. 1092 , 103 S.Ct. 1792 , 76 L.Ed. 2d 359 (1983).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Correa
expecting privacy in a building staircase accessible to other tenants and the general public cannot be considered reasonable.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Patrick L. Swindall
See United States v. Capo, 693 F.2d 1330, 1335 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1092 , 103 S.Ct. 1793 , 76 L.Ed.2d 359 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. McGlory
See United States v. Dickens, 695 F.2d 765, 779 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1092 , 103 S.Ct. 1792 , 76 L.Ed.2d 359 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Reginald D. McGlory Melvin Hauser, Norman Gomez, A/K/A Chubbs, Roland Slade, Norma Jean Pruitt, Vira Kulkivit, A/K/A Wee, Yongyos Thauthong, Willie J. Purdom and Charles Cotton. Vira Kulkovit, United States of America v. Reginald D. McGlory Melvin Hauser, Norman Gomez, A/K/A Chubbs, Roland Slade, Norma Jean Pruitt, Vira Kulkivit, A/K/A Wee, Yongyos Thauthong, Willie J. Purdom and Charles Cotton. Melvin Hauser, United States of America v. Reginald D. McGlory Melvin Hauser, Norman Gomez, A/K/A Chubbs, Roland Slade, Norma Jean Pruitt, Vira Kulkivit, A/K/A Wee, Yongyos Thauthong, Willie J. Purdom and Charles Cotton. Reginald D. McGlory United States of America v. Reginald D. McGlory Melvin Hauser, Norman Gomez, A/K/A Chubbs, Roland Slade, Norma Jean Pruitt, Vira Kulkivit, A/K/A Wee, Yongyos Thauthong, Willie J. Purdom and Charles Cotton. Charles Cotton
See United States v. Dickens, 695 F.2d 765, 779 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1092 , 103 S.Ct. 1792 , 76 L.Ed.2d 359 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mario Eufrasio, A/K/A Murph, United States of America v. Santo Idone, A/K/A Sam, A/K/A Sam From Chester, A/K/A Papa, A/K/A Big Santo, United States of America v. Gary S. Iacona
See United States v. Dickens, 695 F.2d 765, 778-79 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1092 , 103 S.Ct. 1792 , 76 L.Ed.2d 359 (1983). 17 "[J]oinder ... of a conspiracy count and substantive counts arising out of the conspiracy [is permitted], since the claim of conspiracy provides a common link, and demonstrates the existence of a common scheme or plan." United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723, 729-730 (3d Cir.) (emphasis in Somers, quoting Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, Sec. 144), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 57, 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974). 78 We agree with the Sec…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eufrasio
See United States v. Dickens, 695 F.2d 765, 778-79 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1092 , 103 S.Ct. 1792 , 76 L.Ed.2d 359 (1983). 17 “[Jjoinder ... of a conspiracy count and substantive counts arising out of the conspiracy [is permitted], since the claim of conspiracy provides a common link, and demonstrates the existence of a common scheme or plan.” United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723, 729-730 (3d Cir.) (emphasis in Somers , quoting Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 144), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 57, 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Zolp
See United States v. Dickens, 695 F.2d 765 , 779 n. 19 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1092 , 103 S.Ct. 1792 , 76 L.Ed.2d 359 (1983); see also United States v. Górecki, 813 F.2d 40 , *702 42-43 (3d Cir.1987) (“bare allegation [of prejudice] without a specific showing as to what that testimony may have been, fails to meet the stringent requirements for a Rule 14 showing of prejudice”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Peter Balistrieri, Steve Disalvo, and Dennis Librizzi, Defendants
See United States v. Bastanipour, 697 F.2d 170, 174-75 (7th Cir.1982), cert, denied, 460 U.S. 1091 , 103 S.Ct. 1790 , 76 L.Ed.2d 358 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Matthews, Michael J.
See also United States v. Tucker, 404 U.S. at 443, 447 , 92 S.Ct. at 591, 592 (the sentence imposed by a federal district judge, if within the statutory limits, is generally not subject to review); United States v. Felder, 744 F.2d 18, 20 (3d Cir.1984) (absent procedural defects, reviewing court will not interfere with trial court’s sentencing discretion if sentence falls within the statutory limitation); accord United States v. Dickens, 695 F.2d 765 , 782 n. 26 (3d Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 460 U.S. 1092 , 103 S.Ct. 1792 , 76 L.Ed.2d 359 (1983); United States v. Del Piano, 593 F.2d 539, 540…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kathy Koopmans, United States of America v. Douglas Henry
See United States v. Bastanipour, 697 F.2d 170, 175-76 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1091 , 103 S.Ct. 1790 , 76 L.Ed.2d 358 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ricardo R. Esle, Roberto Diaz Gomez, A/K/A Robert Redruello, and Luis G. Arango
(2×)
See United States v. Capo, 693 F.2d 1330, 1335 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1092 , 103 S.Ct. 1793 , 76 L.Ed.2d 359 (1983). 55 The second instance of misconduct Arango complains of was likewise cured by instruction.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Israel Alvarez, Sr., Monolo Alvarez, Rafael Alvarez, Harry Bosquet, Jose Antonio Leyva, Israel Alvarez, Jr.
See United States v. Capo, 693 F.2d 1330, 1335 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1092 , 103 S.Ct. 1793 , 76 L.Ed.2d 359 (1983); United States v. Webb, 463 F.2d 1324, 1328 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 338 , 34 L.Ed.2d 251 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Trafalgar Capital Associates, Inc. v. Cisneros
See also Cowhig v. Marsh, 693 F.2d 234, 235 (1st Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1092 , 103 S.Ct. 1793 , 76 L.Ed.2d 359 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shimote v. Vincent
See also United States v. Bastanipour, 697 F.2d 170, 173 (7th Cir.1982) (finding that the trial court had jurisdiction over the merits of the case after the government appealed the order granting the defendant’s motion to compel cooperation of government personnel), ce rt. denied, 460 U.S. 1091 , 103 S.Ct. 1790 , 76 L.Ed.2d 358 (1983); United States v. Crozier, 674 F.2d 1293, 1296-97 (9th Cir. 1982) (holding that the appellate court had jurisdiction to hear the interlocutory appeal on a restraining order and the district court retained jurisdiction to proceed with the trial), ce rt. granted …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mewbourn v. State
See also United States v. Capo , 693 F.2d 1330 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1092 , 103 S.Ct. 1793 , 76 L.Ed.2d 359 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Edward F. Krull v. The Celotex Corporation
See, e.g., United States v. Bastanipour, 697 F.2d 170 , 173 n. 1 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1091 , 103 S.Ct. 1790 , 76 L.Ed.2d 358 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Miller
See, e.g., United States v. Bastanipour, 697 F.2d 170 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1091 , 103 S.Ct. 1790 , 76 L.Ed.2d 358 (1983); United States v. Stipe, 653 F.2d 446 (10th Cir.1931).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wright-Barker
United States v. Giampa, 758 F.2d 928 , 936 n. 1 (3d Cir.1985). 8 As these ten defendants did not properly preserve before the district court the issue of evidentiary sufficiency of their convictions, either by renewing the motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the evidence or by filing a timely post-verdict motion, Manos dictates that this Court may review that matter only for plain error. 340 F.2d at 537 ; see also United States v. Dickens, 695 F.2d 765, 781 (3d Cir.1982), cert. de nied, 460 U.S. 1092 , 103 S.Ct. 1792 , 76 L.Ed.2d 359 (1983). 9 Indeed, Garcia-Sanmiguel, Chin, Igua…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mahoney v. United States
They contend that under 28 U.S.C, § 2401 a claim for illegal discharge from the armed forces accrues at the time of discharge; see, e.g., Cowhig v. Marsh, 693 F.2d 234, 235 (1st Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1092 , 103 S.Ct. 1793 , 76 L.Ed.2d 359 (1983); Brewster v. Secretary of the Army, 489 F.Supp. 85, 87 (E.D.N.Y.1980), and that plaintiffs claim thus accrued when he was discharged on May 24, 1956.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
37 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1652, 37 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,222 Royston E. Potter v. Murray City, a Municipal Corporation, Calvin G. Gillen, Individually and in His Capacity as Chief of Police of Murray City, Murray City Civil Service Commission, the Honorable Scott M. Metheson, as Governor of the State of Utah, the Honorable David L. Wilkinson, as Attorney General of the State of Utah, the State of Utah and the United States of America
E.g., Bob Jones University v. United States, 461 U.S. 574, 603 , 103 S.Ct. 2017, 2034-35 , 76 L.Ed.2d 157 (1983); United States v. Lee, 455 U.S. 252, 257 , 102 S.Ct. 1051, 1055 , 71 L.Ed.2d 127 (1982); see also United States v. Dickens, 695 F.2d 765, 772 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1092 , 103 S.Ct. 1792 , 76 L.Ed.2d 359 and 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1883 , 76 L.Ed.2d 812 (1983); United States v. Carroll, 567 F.2d 955, 957 (10th Cir.1977) (per curiam). 7 15 We are in agreement with the district court that the State of Utah 16 beyond the declaration of policy and public interest implici…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Potter v. Murray City
E.g., Bob Jones University v. United States, 461 U.S. 574, 603 , 103 S.Ct. 2017, 2034-35 , 76 L.Ed.2d 157 (1983); United States v. Lee, 455 U.S. 252, 257 , 102 S.Ct. 1051, 1055 , 71 L.Ed.2d 127 (1982); see also United States v. Dickens, 695 F.2d 765, 772 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1092 , 103 S.Ct. 1792 , 76 L.Ed.2d 359 and 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1883 , 76 L.Ed.2d 812 (1983); United States v. Carroll, 567 F.2d 955, 957 (10th Cir.1977) (per curiam). 7 We are in agreement with the district court that the State of Utah beyond the declaration of policy and public interest implicit in t…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hazra
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-6325.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: D. New Jersey (1)
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.