green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Junger v. Daley
See United States v. Spawr Optical Research, Inc., 685 F.2d 1076, 1079-1082 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 905 , 103 S.Ct. 1875 , 76 L.Ed.2d 807 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Medite of New Mexico, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
See Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. NLRB, 920 F.2d 130 , 138 (2d Cir.1990) (stating that the Board’s “acceptance of a ALJ’s finding regarding witness credibility will not be reversed unless those findings are ‘hopelessly incredible’ ”) (quoting NLRB v. American Geri-Care, Inc., 697 F.2d 56, 60 (2d Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 461 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 1876 , 76 L.Ed.2d 807 (1983)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Medite Of New Mexico, Inc., Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board
See Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. NLRB, 920 F.2d 130 , 138 (2d Cir.1990) (stating that the Board's "acceptance of a ALJ's finding regarding witness credibility will not be reversed unless those findings are 'hopelessly incredible' ") (quoting NLRB v. American Geri-Care, Inc., 697 F.2d 56, 60 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 1876 , 76 L.Ed.2d 807 (1983)).D.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Borders
(2×)
See United States v. Borders, 693 F.2d 1318, 1319-23 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 905 , 103 S.Ct. 1875 , 76 L.Ed.2d 807 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robel Alberto Vargas
See United States v. Borders, 693 F.2d 1318, 1324-25 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 905 , 103 S.Ct. 1875 , 76 L.Ed.2d 807 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert T. Ewing, an Individual v. National Labor Relations Board
To remand the case again would not engage this Court and the Board in a “ping pong game.” NLRB v. Wyman-Gordon Co., 394 U.S. 759 , 766 n. 6, 89 S.Ct. 1426 , 1430 n. 6, 22 L.Ed.2d 709 (1969) (plurality opinion); see NLRB v. American Geri-Care, Inc., 697 F.2d 56, 64 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 1876 , 76 L.Ed.2d 807 (1983). [T]he process [of remanding], even though it may appear wasteful as regards the case in hand, is important for the proper execution of the legislative will, since proceeding on the right path may require or at least permit the agency to make quali…
cited
Cited "see"
Hastings v. Judicial Conference of United States
See United States v. Borders, 693 F.2d 1318 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 905 , 103 S.Ct. 1875 , 76 L.Ed.2d 807 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vanguard Interstate Tours, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America
As the court noted, “[DJeference is ultimately a function of Congress’ intent.” 693 F.2d at 167 (internal quotations and citations omitted); accord Process Gas Consumers Group v. U.S. Dep’t of Agriculture, 694 F.2d 778 , 791 (D.C.Cir.1982) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 1874 , 76 L.Ed.2d 807 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Humphries
v.
South Carolina
v.
South Carolina
No. 82-1310.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 25, 1983.
Published
Sup. Ct. S. C. Certiorari denied.