green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.9 score
“application of a tolling theory based on discovery of the wrong clearly would do violence to a statute containing its own limited discovery rule.”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Ryder Energy Distribution Corporation v. Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc., E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., and New York Mercantile Exchange
But see Walck v. American Stock Exchange, Inc., 687 F.2d 778, 782-88 (3d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 942 , 103 S.Ct. 2118 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1983) (no implied private cause of action under either former or present versions of section 6).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jordan v. McDonald
application of a tolling theory based on discovery of the wrong clearly would do violence to a statute containing its own limited discovery rule.
discussed
Cited "see"
Riggs v. Schappell
See Walck v. American Stock Exchange, Inc., 687 F.2d 778, 780 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 942 , 103 S.Ct. 2118 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1983); Ferreri v. Fox, Rothschild, O’Brien & Frankel, 690 F.Supp. 400 , 403 n. 3 (E.D.Pa.1988) (“There are no private rights of action under Sections 6 and 7 of the Exchange Act.”). 13 Whether section 17 of *331 the Exchange Act supports an implied private right of action, presents an entirely separate question from the issue decided in Walck , and appears to be a novel question of law. 14 In Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66, 78 , 95 S.Ct. 2080, 2087-88 , 45…
cited
Cited "see"
46 Fair empl.prac.cas. 117, 46 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,856 Crystal Chambers, in Her Own Behalf and in Behalf of Her Minor Daughter, Ruth Chambers v. The Omaha Girls Club, Inc., a Nebraska Corporation
See Avery v. Homewood City Bd. of Educ., 674 F.2d 337, 341-42 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 943 , 103 S.Ct. 2119 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1983); Andrews v. Drew Mun.
cited
Cited "see"
Chambers v. Omaha Girls Club, Inc.
See Avery v. Homewood City Bd. of Educ., 674 F.2d 337, 341-42 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 943 , 103 S.Ct. 2119 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1983); Andrews v. Drew Mun.
discussed
Cited "see"
Odesser v. Continental Bank
See Walck v. American Stock Exchange, 687 F.2d 778 , 791 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied 461 U.S. 942 , 103 S.Ct. 2118 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1983), citing Landy v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 486 F.2d 139 , 162-63 (3d Cir.1973) cert. denied 416 U.S. 960 , 94 S.Ct. 1979 , 40 L.Ed.2d 312 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Edelstein v. Wilentz
See Walck v. American Stock Exchange, Inc., 687 F.2d 778, 792-93 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 942 , 103 S.Ct. 2118 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1983); Tully v. Mott Supermarkets, Inc., 540 F.2d 187, 196 (3d Cir.1976). 28 Edelstein argues, however, that the dismissal for lack of jurisdiction must be without prejudice so that he is not barred on the merits of his state law claim.
discussed
Cited "see"
Edelstein v. Wilentz
See Walck v. American Stock Exchange, Inc., 687 F.2d 778, 792-93 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 942 , 103 S.Ct. 2118 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1983); Tully v. Mott Supermarkets, Inc., 540 F.2d 187, 196 (3d Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rolo v. City Investing Co.
See, e.g., Walck v. American Stock Exchange, Inc., 687 F.2d 778, 791 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 942 , 103 S.Ct. 2118 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1983); Monsen v. Consolidated Dressed Beef Co., 579 F.2d 793, 799 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vt Investors v. R & D FUNDING CORP.
Blue Chip Stamps, 421 U.S. at 737-38 , 95 S.Ct. at 1926 ; see also Walck v. American Stock Exchange, Inc., 687 F.2d 778, 790 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 942 , 103 S.Ct. 2118 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1983) (plaintiff’s allegations of mere inducement to retain stock found insufficient for liability under Rule 10b-5).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dennis A. Walters, Jr., Cross-Appellant v. City of Atlanta, Cross-Appellee. Dennis A. Walters, Jr. v. City of Atlanta, Carole L. Mumford, Movant-Appellant. Dennis A. Walters, Jr. v. City of Atlanta
See, e.g., Avery v. Homewood City Board of Education, 674 F.2d 337 (5th Cir.1982, Unit B) [, cert. denied, 461 U.S. 943 , 103 S.Ct. 2119 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1983) ]. 27 Lee, 684 F.2d at 774 (footnote omitted); see also Bell, 715 F.2d at 1557 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Walters v. City of Atlanta
See, e.g., Avery v. Homewood City Board of Education, 674 F.2d 337 (5th Cir.1982, Unit B) [, cert. denied, 461 U.S. 943 , 103 S.Ct. 2119 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1983)].
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Shahmirzadi v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co.
See also Walck v. American Stock Exchange, 687 F.2d 778 , 788 (3d Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 461 U.S. 942 , 103 S.Ct. 2118 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alvie Thompkins v. Morris Brown College
See, e.g., Avery v. Homewood City Board of Education, 674 F.2d 337 (5th Cir.1982, Unit B) [, cert. denied, 461 U.S. 943 , 103 S.Ct. 2119 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1983)[ 10 ], Lee, 684 F.2d at 774 (footnote omitted); see also Bell, 715 F.2d at 1557 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gustafson v. Strangis
See, e.g., Walck v. American Stock Exchange, 687 F.2d 778 (3d Cir. 1982), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 2118 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1983) (§§ 6 and 7); Jablon v. Dean Witter & Co., 614 F.2d 677 (9th Cir.1980) (no cause of action for violation of stock exchange, § 6, or NASD, § 15A, rules); Kaufman v. Magid, 539 F.Supp. 1088 (D.Mass.1982) (stock exchange rules); Emmons v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 532 F.Supp. 480 (S.D.Ohio 1982) (stock exchange and NASD rules); Holtzman v. Proctor, Cook & Co., Inc., 528 F.Supp. 9 (D.Mass.1981) (§ 6); Colman v. D.H.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Drury
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-1395.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 23, 1983.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: D. Massachusetts (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.