green
Positive treatment
7.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Graves v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
The ruling that is before us on this appeal is that of Judge Wagner. [4] See, e.g., Reese v. United States, 467 A.2d 152, 159 (D.C.1983); Williams v. United States, 421 A.2d 19, 26 (D.C.1980); Branch v. United States, 372 A.2d 998, 1000 (D.C.1977). [5] See, e.g., Tribble v. United States, 447 A.2d 766, 768 (D.C.1982); Shreeves v. United States, 395 A.2d 774, 783 (D.C.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 943 , 99 S.Ct. 2161 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1045 (1979); United States v. Bolden, 381 A.2d 624, 627 (D.C. 1977); but see Reed v. United States, 383 A.2d 316, 318-19 (D.C.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 871 , 99 S.Ct. …
discussed
Cited "see"
1900 Highway 190, L.L.C. v. City of Slidell
See ATC South, Inc. v. Charleston County, 380 S.C. 191, 197-98 , 669 S.E.2d 337 (South Carolina 2008) (citing Westborough Mall, Inc. v. City of Cape Girardeau, Mo., 693 F.2d 733 , 747 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2122 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983) (applying Missouri | slaw, the court held “[c]ompetitive disadvantage alone does not give rise to standing!)]”); Earth Movers of Fairbanks, Inc. v. Fairbanks N. Star Borough, 865 P.2d 741, 745 (Alaska 1993) (“[W]e thus adopt the majority rule and deny standing to a business competitor whose only alleged injury results from …
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Fields
See United States v. Murphy, 696 F.2d 282, 283-284 (C.A.4 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Sua
See United States v. Murphy, 696 F.2d 282, 286 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 [ 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 2124, 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 ] (1983); United States v. Garner, 574 F.2d 1141, 1144 (4th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles William McHan United States of America v. Charles William McHan
(2×)
See United States v. Murphy, 696 F.2d 282, 286 .(4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 2124, 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983); United States v. Garner, 574 F.2d 1141, 1144 (4th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
Lyons v. United States
See Parks v. United States, 451 A.2d 591, 600 (D.C.1982), ce rt. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lyons v. United States
(2×)
See Parks v. United States, 451 A.2d 591, 600 (D.C. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Metropolitan Express Services, Inc. v. City Of Kansas City, Missouri
See Westborough Mall, Inc. v. City of Cape Girardeau, 693 F.2d 733, 747 (8th Cir.1982) (looking to state law to decide whether plaintiff had standing to raise state claim in federal court), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2122 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983); City of Moore v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry., 699 F.2d 507, 511 (10th Cir.1983) (stating that state law determines who has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a state statute on the ground that it violates state constitution); Owen of Ga., Inc. v. Shelby County, 648 F.2d 1084, 1088-90 (6th Cir.1981) (applying state law to d…
discussed
Cited "see"
Metropolitan Express Services, Inc. v. City of Kansas City
See Westborough Mall, Inc. v. City of Cape Girardeau, 693 F.2d 733, 747 (8th Cir.1982) (looking to state law to decide whether plaintiff had standing to raise state claim in federal court), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2122 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983); City of Moore v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry., 699 F.2d 507, 511 (10th Cir.1983) (stating that state law determines who has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a state statute on the ground that it violates state constitution); Owen of Ga., Inc. v. Shelby County, 648 F.2d 1084, 1088-90 (6th Cir.1981) (applying state law to d…
cited
Cited "see"
Davis v. United States
See Parks v. United States, 451 A.2d 591, 607-08 (D.C.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Stock v. Arnott
See Medve v. Walakovits, 305 Pa.Super. 75 , 451 A.2d 249 (1982), cert. denied, Orloski v. Mellenberg, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hunter v. United States
(2×)
See Parks v. United States, 451 A.2d 591, 613 (D.C.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Golsun v. United States
If it did, “then, viewing the comments in context, we must consider the gravity of the misconduct, its relationship to the issue of guilt, the effect of any corrective action by the trial judge, and the strength of the government’s case.” Irick v. United States, 565 A.2d 26, 32 (D.C.1989) (citation omitted); see Parks v. United States, 451 A.2d 591, 611-12 (D.C.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Oberndorf v. City & County of Denver
See Westborough Mall, Inc. v. City of Cape Girardeau, Mo., 693 F.2d 733, 746 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2122 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Oberndorf v. City And County Of Denver
See Westborough Mall, Inc. v. City of Cape Girardeau, Mo., 693 F.2d 733, 746 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2122 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.
The exception, in this limited sense, is inapplicable to defendants’ activity — plaintiffs cannot seriously contend that defendants offered jobs to legislators in order to directly harm plaintiff, and that defendants had no interest in the pending legislation in Congress. *410 However, several courts have also held that the Noerr-Pennington doctrine was not “intended to protect those who employ illegal means to influence their representatives in government.” Sacramento Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Chauffers, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 150, 440 F.2d 1096 , 1099 (9th Cir.1971); see Centr…
cited
Cited "see"
Buckley v. Buckley
See Medve v. Walakovits, 305 Pa. Super. 75 , 451 A.2d 249 (1982), cert. den. 103 S. Ct. 2123 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Mercy-Peninsula Ambulance, Inc. v. County of San Mateo
See Sun Valley Disposal Co. v. Silver State Disposal Co., 420 F.2d 341, 342-43 (9th Cir.1969) (Noerr and Pennington have “eroded the authority of Harman”)) Westborough Mall, Inc. v. City of Cape Girardeau, 693 F.2d 733, 746 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2122 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983); Metro-Cable Co. v. CATV of Rockford, Inc., 516 F.2d 220, 229-30 (7th Cir.1975) (“such a rule would in practice abrogate the Noerr doctrine”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sherrod v. United States
United States v. Free, 141 U.S.App.D.C. 198, 202-03 , 437 F.2d 631, 635-36 (1970); see Reed v. United States, 403 A.2d 725 , 730 n. 7 (D.C.1979); accord Parks v. United States, 451 A.2d 591, 614 (D.C.1982), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983) (prosecutor’s failure to seek court permission for “missing witness” argument not “grave misconduct” since argument “did not directly urge the jury to draw ... an inference adverse to appellant.”) (quoting Fletcher v. United States, 335 A.2d 248, 250 (D.C.1975)).
cited
Cited "see"
Impro Products, Inc. v. Herrick
See Westborough Mall v. City of Cape Girardeau, 693 F.2d 733 , 746-747 (8th Cir.1982), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 2122 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clark v. United States
(2×)
Compare Scull, 564 A.2d at 1166 (applying Chapman test in assessing denial of any opportunity to cross-examine key government witnesses for bias) and Bassil, 517 A.2d at 716-17 (applying Chapman test to exclusion of all defense testimony as to bad reputation of government witness for truth and veracity) with Roundtree v. United States, 581 A.2d 315 , 328 & 329 n. 34 (D.C.1990) (applying Kotteakos test to ruling excluding as irrelevant evidence concerning condition of alleged rape victim’s genitalia) and Parks v. United States, 451 A.2d 591 , 610 & n. 37 (D.C.1982) (applying Kotteakos test to…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Morris v. United States
See Allen, 603 A.2d at 1225-26 ; see also Parks v. United States, 451 A.2d 591, 614 (D.C.1981), ce rt. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983); Arnold, supra, 511 A.2d at 416; Sherrod v. United States, 478 A.2d 644, 654 (D.C.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
No. 89-3082
Compare Westborough Mall, Inc. v. City of Cape Girardeau, 693 F.2d 733, 746 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2122 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983) (circumstantial evidence of illegal or fraudulent actions deprived defendants of state action immunity) with Scott, 736 F.2d at 1215 (absent allegation of bribery or other illegal acts, council may invoke state action immunity doctrine upon a proper showing of authorization).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jacobs, Visconsi & Jacobs, Co. v. City of Lawrence
Compare Westborough Mall, Inc. v. City of Cape Girardeau, 693 F.2d 733, 746 (8th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 461 U.S. 945, 103 S.Ct. 2122 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983) (circumstantial evidence of illegal or fraudulent actions deprived defendants of state action immunity) with Scott, 736 F.2d at 1215 (absent allegation of bribery or other illegal acts, council may invoke state action immunity doctrine upon a proper showing of authorization).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re: Ibp Confidential Business Documents Litigation. Hughes A. Bagley v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Westborough Mall v. City of Cape Girardeau, 693 F.2d 733 , 746 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2122 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983); Sacramento Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers Local No. 150, 440 F.2d 1096 , 1099 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 826 , 92 S.Ct. 57 , 30 L.Ed.2d 54 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Lee Morrow
See also United States v. Murphy, 696 F.2d 282, 287 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, -— U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983) (reference to time spent "in the institution” is "troubling," but does not constitute reversible error). 5 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robinson
v.
Cumberland Capital Corp.
v.
Cumberland Capital Corp.
No. 82-1659.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 23, 1983.
Published
Ct. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied.