green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
9.8 score
“there must be an exceptional reason, typically the protection of a constitutional right, to invoke the exclusionary rule.”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 46 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "but see"
ca1 1985
But cf. United States v. Hensel, 699 F.2d 18, 31 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1983).
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Anello
But cf. United States v. Hensel, 699 F.2d 18, 31 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1983).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Walker v. Contimortgage (In Re Walker)
a default judgment is not a proper basis for collateral estoppel
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Ramsey, Charles W.
there must be an exceptional reason, typically the protection of a constitutional right, to invoke the exclusionary rule.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Ramsey, Charles W.
there must be an exceptional reason, typically the protection of a constitutional right, to invoke the exclusionary rule.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Artmatic USA Cosmetics v. Maybelline Co.
default judgment is not a proper basis for collateral estoppel
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Vasquez
Accord, United States v. Hensel, 699 F.2d 18 (IstCir.), cert. den., 461 U.S. 958 (1983) (possession of a “participants’ list” by one of several co-defendants which contained the names of the others was circumstantial evidence of the guilt of the others and not excludable as hearsay because it was not conduct intended as an assertion).
cited
Cited "see"
Sulfridge v. Piatt, Unpublished Decision (12-26-2001)
See id. at 1058; see, also, Matulin v. Academy of Court Reporting (Apr. 8, 1992), Summit App. No. 14947, unreported; Lewis v. Sea World, Inc. (Mar. 26, 1993), Portage App. No. 91-P-2310, unreported.
cited
Cited "see"
Rose v. Shalala
See Sherwin v. Secretary of HHS, 685 F.2d 1, 2-3 (1st Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2432 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1318 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Rose v. Shalala
See Sherwin ___ _______ v. Secretary of HHS, 685 F.2d 1, 2-3 (1st Cir. 1982), cert. ________________ _____ denied, 461 U.S. 958 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Rose v. Shalala
See Sherwin v. Secretary of HHS, 685 F.2d 1, 2-3 (1st Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2432 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1318 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Drill Parts and Service Co. v. Joy Mfg.
See Grip-Pak, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc. , 694 F.2d 466 , 471 (7th Cir. 1982) (applying Illinois law), cert. denied , 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2430 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1983); Deary v. Evans , 570 F. Supp. 189 , 200 (D.V.I. 1983); Sage International, Ltd. v. Cadillac Gage Co. , 556 F. Supp. 381 , 388-90 *Page 1288 (E.D.Mich. 1982); Voytko v. Ramada Inn of Atlantic City , 445 F. Supp. 315 , 325 (D.N.J. 1978); United States v. Chatham , 415 F. Supp. 1214 , 1218 (N.D.Ga. 1976); Chain v. International City Bank Trust Co. , 333 F. Supp. 463 , 481 (E.D.La. 1971) (applying Mississippi law); Hall…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Moore
See, United States v. Hillard, 701 F.2d 1052 , 1062 n. 9 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1318 (1983) (court did not reach standing issue where it found adequate probable cause to support original wiretap order as well as subsequent orders).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sunshine Cellular v. Vanguard Cellular Systems, Inc.
See, .e.g., Grip-Pak, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc., 694 F.2d 466 (7th Cir. 1982), cert. den., 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2430 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1983) (sham litigation may form a predicate for Sherman Act § 1 violation even if not tortious).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Fecteau
See United States v. Hensel, 699 F.2d 18, 41 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 464 U.S. 823 , 464 U.S. 824 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Claudio v. State
See United States v. Hillard, 701 F.2d 1052 (2nd Cir.1983), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1318 (1983); United States v. Kopituk, 690 F.2d 1289 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 928 , 103 S.Ct. 2089 , 77 L.Ed.2d 300 (1983); United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136 , 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 (1982); and Henderson v. Lane, 613 F.2d 175 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 986 , 100 S.Ct. 2971 , 64 L.Ed.2d 844 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Jose L. GORDILS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, Appellee
See Sherwin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 685 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2432 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1318 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Keith D. Long, United States of America v. Sonia E. Mayfield
(2×)
Long thus fails to satisfy the intent component of rui^ 801, which “place[s] the burden upon the party claiming that the intention existed.” Fed.R.Evid. 801 advisory committee note; accord United States v. Hensel, 699 F.2d 18, 31 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ianniello
Similarly, the Court of Appeals in United States v. Calbas, 821 F.2d 887 (2d Cir.1987), ce rt. denied, 485 U.S. 937 , 108 S.Ct. 1114 , 99 L.Ed.2d 275 (1988), found “no substance in Calbas’s suggestion that the District Court acted improperly in conducting a limited inquiry,” asserting that it had previously stated that "the trial court has wide discretion in deciding how to pursue an inquiry into the effects of extra-record information,” Id. at 896; see United States v. Hillard, 701 F.2d 1052, 1064 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1318 (1983), and “…
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Burnette
See United States v. Hillard, 701 F.2d 1052 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1318 (1983); United States v. Kopituk, 690 F.2d 1289 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1209 , 103 S.Ct. 3542 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1391 (1983); United States v. Phillips, supra; United States v. Lamb, 529 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
See United States v. Hillard, 701 F.2d 1052 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1318 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Smith
See United States v. Hillard, 701 F.2d 1052 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1318 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eduardo Jaime Rouco
United States v. Tegzes, 715 F.2d 505, 507 (11th Cir.1983); see United States v. Carlin, 698 F.2d 1133 , 1135 & n. 7 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Jacob Wells
See United States v. Hensel, 699 F.2d 18 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
ca1 1985
See United States v. Hensel, 699 F.2d 18, 33 (1st Cir.) cert. denied 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1983); United States v. Patterson, 644 F.2d 890, 893 (1st Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Beltran
See United States v. Hensel, 699 F.2d 18, 33 (1st Cir.) cert. denied 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1983); United States v. Patterson, 644 F.2d 890, 893 (1st Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bubar v. Ampco Foods, Inc.
Solinger v. A & M Records, Inc. [Solinger I], 586 F.2d 1304 , 1309-10 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 908 , 99 S.Ct. 1999 , 60 L.Ed.2d 377 (1979); see Grip-Pak, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc., 694 F.2d 466, 475 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2430 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1983). 30 In this case, there is no doubt that the plaintiffs intended to enter the market.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bubar v. Ampco Foods, Inc.
Solinger v. A & M Records, Inc. [Solinger I], 586 F.2d 1304, 1309-10 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 908 , 99 S.Ct. 1999 , 60 L.Ed.2d 377 (1979); see Grip-Pak, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc., 694 F.2d 466, 475 (7th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2430 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles W. Ramsey
“Where Congress has both established a right and provided exclusive remedies for its violation, we would ‘encroach upon the prerogatives’ of Congress were we to authorize a remedy not provided for by statute.” Ware, 161 F.3d at 424 (quoting United States v. Frazin, 780 F.2d 1461, 1466 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 844 , 107 S.Ct. 158 , 93 L.Ed.2d 98 (1986)); see United States v. Thompson, 936 F.2d 1249, 1251-52 (11th Cir.1991) (court may not suppress testimony for statutory violation unless Congress explicitly or implicitly provided exclusion as a remedy for a violation), cert. de…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward Cencer
See, e.g., United States v. Quiroz-Cortez, 960 F.2d 418, 419 (5th Cir.1992); United States v. Huntress, 956 F.2d 1309, 1312 (5th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 905 , 113 S.Ct. 2330 , 124 L.Ed.2d 243 (1993); United States v. Guevara, 823 F.2d 446, 447 (11th Cir.1987); United States v. Davis, 608 F.2d 698, 698-99 (6th Cir.1979) (per curiam), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 918 , 100 S.Ct. 1280 , 63 L.Ed.2d 602 (1980); see also United States v. Hillard, 701 F.2d 1052, 1055 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1318 (1983) (district court substituted alternate after defenda…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hills v. HHS
See Rose, supra, 34 F.3d at 19 ; see also Sherwin v. Secretary, 685 F.2d 1, 4 (1st Cir. 1982) ("Grid will offer only guidance--!! will not determine 'disability'--in borderline cases or where nonexertional, or additional, disabilities are at issue."), cert, denied sub nom., Picard v. Secretary, 461 U.S. 958 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burgess v. United States
(2×)
Id.; see also United States v. Hensel, 699 F.2d 18, 31 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Griffith v. Sullivan
See id. at 460 , 103 S.Ct. at 1953; see also Sherwin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 685 F.2d 1, 2 (1st Cir.1982), cert. denied, Picard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2432 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1318 (1983). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Christian v. Sizemore
Id.; see also Grip-Pak, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc., 694 F.2d 466, 469 (7th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2430 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1983); Blea v. Sandoval, 107 N.M. 554, 558 , 761 P.2d 432, 435-36 , cert. denied, 107 N.M. 413 , 759 P.2d 200 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bobo
See, e.g., United States v. Hillard, 701 F.2d 1052 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1318 (1983); United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136 , 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 , 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982); Henderson v. Lane, 613 F.2d 175 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 986 , 100 S.Ct. 2971 , 64 L.Ed.2d 844 (1980) (no constitutional bar to a state court allowing substitution of an alternate after deliberations have begun); United States v. Kopituk, 690 F.2d 1289 , 1311 (11th Cir.1983)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Dixon v. Jack R. Duckworth
See also United States v. Hillard, 701 F.2d 1052, 1056-57 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 (1983); United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 992-93 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 (1982). 38 In Henderson, the habeas petitioner, Henderson, was tried before a state jury of twelve regular and two alternate jurors.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brian Gremillion and Connie Gremillion v. Gulf Coast Catering Company, Doerle's Quarterboats, Inc., and Albany Insurance Company
See, e.g., Barger v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc., 692 F.2d 337, 344-45 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2430 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1316 (1983); Smith v. Pan Air Corp., 684 F.2d 1102 (5th Cir.1982). 7 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Norman v. Johnson
See also Grip-Pak, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc., 694 F.2d 466, 469-70 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2430 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Burnette
(2×)
Orfield, Trial Jurors in Federal Criminal Cases, 29 F.R.D. 43 , 46 (1962)); see also United *589 States v. Hillard, 701 F.2d 1052, 1057 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1318 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Washington Post Company v. United States Department of State
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Hensel, 699 F.2d 18, 25 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1983); United States v. (Under Seal), 794 F.2d 920, 928 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 331 , 93 L.Ed.2d 303 (1986); United States v. Morrow, 537 F.2d 120, 139 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 956 , 97 S.Ct. 1602 , 51 L.Ed.2d 806 (1977); United States v. Rose, 570 F.2d 1358, 1362 (9th Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Suttles v. Vogel
Harding Co. v. Harding (1933), 352 Ill. 417, 427 ; see also Grip-Pak, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc. (7th Cir. 1982), 694 F.2d 466, 469 , cert. denied (1983), 461 U.S. 958 , 77 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Badalamenti
Compare United States v. Hillard, 701 F.2d 1052, 1058, 1060-61 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1318 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hoffman v. Nustra
Harding Co. v. Harding (1933), 352 Ill. 417, 427 ; see also Grip-Pak, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc. (7th Cir. 1982), 694 F.2d 466, 469 , cert. denied (1983), 461 U.S. 958 , 77 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gambino, Rosario, Erasmo Gambino, Antonio Gambino, and Anthony Spatola
See, e.g., United States v. Hillard, 701 F.2d 1052, 1058 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1318 (1983); United States v. Kopituk, 690 F.2d 1289, 1309-11 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied sub. nom., Turner v. United States, 461 U.S. 928 , 103 S.Ct. 2089 , 77 L.Ed.2d 300 (1983); United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 994-96 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied sub. nom., Meinster v. United States, 457 U.S. 1136 , 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bulls v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Hillard, 701 F.2d 1052, 1058 (2d Cir.) (charges arising from large-scale heroin operation), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1318 (1983); Kaminski, 692 F.2d at 518 (mail fraud and conspiracy charges against five co-defendants); United States v. Kopituk, 690 F.2d 1289, 1308 (11th Cir.1982) (massive, complex RICO case), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 928 & 460 U.S. 289 , 103 S.Ct. 2089 & 103 S.Ct. 3542 , 77 L.Ed.2d 300 & 77 L.Ed.2d 1391 (1983); United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 994 (5th Cir.1981) (narcotics and RICO charges against two co-defend…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Housing Authority for La Salle County v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n
Harding Co. v. Harding (1933), 352 Ill. 417, 427 ; see also Grip-Pak, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc. (7th Cir. 1982), 694 F.2d 466, 469 , cert. denied (1983), 461 U.S. 958 , 77 L.
Barger
v.
Petroleum Helicopters, Inc.
v.
Petroleum Helicopters, Inc.
No. 82-1632.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 31, 1983.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.