Improto v. United States, 462 U.S. 1108 (1983). · Go Syfert
Improto v. United States, 462 U.S. 1108 (1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
96 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Enrique Reinaldo Rivera and Samuel Aponte-Vega (ca2, 1994-04-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Enrique Reinaldo Rivera and Samuel Aponte-Vega (2×)
2d Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
If the defendant failed to make timely objection to a statement contained in the prosecutor’s summation, the statement will not be deemed a ground for reversal unless it amounts to a “flagrant abuse.” United States v. Ortiz, 857 F.2d 900, 904 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1070 , 109 S.Ct. 1352 , 103 L.Ed.2d 820 (1989); see United States v. Perez, 702 F.2d 33, 37 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1108 , 103 S.Ct. 2457 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1336 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" Orange Environment, Inc. v. Orange County Legislature (2×)
2d Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Perez, 702 F.2d 33 , 33 n. * (2d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1108 , 103 S.Ct. 2457 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1336 (1983); O'Hara v. Long Island R.R., 665 F.2d 8 , 8 n. * (2d Cir.1981) (per curiam)
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Schwartz
2d Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Carson, 702 F.2d 351, 369 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1108 , 103 S.Ct. 2456 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1335 , 462 U.S. 1108 , 103 S.Ct. 2457 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1335 (1983); see also Nersesian, 824 F.2d at 1308 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Schwartz
2d Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Carson, 702 F.2d 351, 369 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1108 , 103 S.Ct. 2456 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1335 , 462 U.S. 1108 , 103 S.Ct. 2457 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1335 (1983); see also Nersesian, 824 F.2d at 1308 .
discussed Cited "see" Hightower v. Kelly (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1987 · signal: accord · confidence high
Although the Confrontation Clause requires that hearsay statements must bear “indicia of reliability” sufficient to afford the fact finder a satisfactory basis for evaluating the truth of the statements, see Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. 56, 65-66 , 100 S.Ct. 2531, 2538-39 , 65 L.Ed.2d 597 (1980), the establishment of a prima facie case of conspiracy will in most instances provide sufficient indicia of reliability for the admission of a co-conspirator’s hearsay statement, see United States v. Puco, 476 F.2d 1099, 1104 (2d Cir.1973) (on petition for rehearing); accord United States v. Perez, …
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Badalamenti (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Perez, 702 F.2d 33, 37 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1108 , 103 S.Ct. 2457 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1336 (1983); United States v. Knuckles, 581 F.2d 305, 313 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 986 , 99 S.Ct. 581 , 58 L.Ed.2d 659 (1978). *662 The co-conspirator-in-furtherance exception also justifies receipt of the few statements of Leonardo Greco who told D’Agostino that he would send someone to show them where the drugs would be tested and that he had sent his brother to be present at the testing.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Robert Hutchings
2d Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Carson, 702 F.2d 351, 369-70 (2d Cir.) (testimony of agents as to matters within their expertise held admissible when it assists the trier of fact to understand the evidence), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1108 , 103 S.Ct. 2457 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1335 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Edwin A. Pagan (2×)
2d Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Perez, 702 F.2d 33, 37 (2d Cir.1983) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 2457 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1336 (1983).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Securities & Exchange Commission v. Tome (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1986 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Perez, 702 F.2d 33, 37 (2d Cir.) (indicating that an independent reliability determination must be made but stating that a declaration in furtherance of the conspiracy will often be sufficient to demonstrate reliability), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1108 , 103 S.Ct. 2457 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1336 (1983) with United States v. Aboumoussallem, 726 F.2d 906, 910 (2d Cir.1984) ("Even if we were to require some indicia of reliability beyond the circumstance of a co-conspirator’s making a report that furthers a conspiracy ...”) (emphasis added).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Normand v. State
Tex. App. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Ex parte Williams, 637 S.W.2d 943, 947 (Tex.Crim.App.1982) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 2458 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1336 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Improto
v.
United States
No. 82-1813.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 6, 1983.
462 U.S. 1108
Published

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.