green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Metropolitan Stevedore Company v. Wesley Brickner Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs
See Kalaris v. Donovan, 697 F.2d 376, 381-83 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1119 , 103 S.Ct. 3088 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1349 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Hodel
See Kalaris v. Donovan, 697 F.2d 376, 397-98 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1119 , 103 S.Ct. 3088 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1349 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Todd Shipyards Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Auto Transportation, S.A., Intervenor-Appellee v. Turbine Service, Inc., Cross-Appellees
See Doe v. Marshall, 694 F.2d 1038, 1041 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1119 , 103 S.Ct. 3087 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1349 (1983); Key v. Wise, 629 F.2d 1049 , 1055 n. 4 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1103 , 102 S.Ct. 682 , 70 L.Ed.2d 647 (1981); Schwartz v. NMS Industries, Inc., 575 F.2d 553, 554 (5th Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Derish v. San Mateo-Burlingame Board of Realtors
We have held that a “judgment on the merits is an absolute bar to a subsequent action between the same parties on the same claim.” Brown v. Federated Department Stores, Inc., 653 F.2d 1266, 1267 (9th Cir.), on remand from Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Moitie, 452 U.S. 394 , 101 S.Ct. 2424 , 69 L.Ed.2d 103 (1981); accord, e.g., Board of Trustees of Carpenters Pension Trust Fund v. Reyes, 688 F.2d 671, 673 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 3088 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1349 (1983); American Triticale, Inc. v. Nytco Services, Inc., 664 F.2d 1136, 1146 (9th Cir.1981); Ell ingson v. B…
discussed
Cited "see"
Derish v. San Mateo-Burlingame Board Of Realtors
We have held that a "judgment on the merits is an absolute bar to a subsequent action between the same parties on the same claim." Brown v. Federated Department Stores, Inc., 653 F.2d 1266, 1267 (9th Cir.), on remand from Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Moitie, 452 U.S. 394 , 101 S.Ct. 2424 , 69 L.Ed.2d 103 (1981); accord, e.g., Board of Trustees of Carpenters Pension Trust Fund v. Reyes, 688 F.2d 671, 673 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 3088 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1349 (1983); American Triticale, Inc. v. Nytco Services, Inc., 664 F.2d 1136, 1146 (9th Cir.1981); Ellingson v. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Max Pievsky v. Thomas J. Ridge, in His Capacity as the Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
The long-standing rule in the context of federal appointments is that “[i]n the absence of specific provision to the contrary, the power of removal from office is incident to the power of appointment.” Keim v. United States, 177 U.S. 290, 293 , 20 S.Ct. 574, 575 , 44 L.Ed. 774 (1900); accord Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52, 161 , 47 S.Ct. 21, 40 , 71 L.Ed. 160 (1926); see also Kalaris v. Donovan, 697 F.2d 376 , 389 & n. 54 (D.C.Cir.) cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1119, 103 S.Ct. 3088 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1349 (1983) (quoting Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886, 896 , 81 S.Ct…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vincent Cooke
See also United States v. Collis, 699 F.2d 832, 834-35 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1119 , 103 S.Ct. 3088 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1349 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ennis Flowers
See also United States v. Collis, 699 F.2d 832, 834-35 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1119 , 103 S.Ct. 3088 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1349 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matthew Chabal, Jr. v. Ronald Reagan
The Supreme Court has long held that “[i]n the absence of specific provision to the contrary, the power of removal from office is incident to the power of appointment.” Keim v. United States, 177 U.S. 290, 293 , 20 S.Ct. 574, 575 , 44 L.Ed. 774 (1900); accord Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52, 161 , 47 S.Ct. 21, 40 , 71 L.Ed. 160 (1926); Ex parte Hennen, 38 U.S. (13 Pet.) 230, 259 , 10 L.Ed. 138 (1839); see also Kalaris v. Donovan, 697 F.2d 376 , 389 & n. 54 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1119 , 103 S.Ct. 3088 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1349 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Henry Morgan
(2×)
United States v. Gargotto, 510 F.2d 409, 411 (6th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 987 , 95 S.Ct. 1990 , 44 L.Ed.2d 477 reh. denied, 423 U.S. 884 , 96 S.Ct. 157 , 46 L.Ed.2d 115 (1975); United States v. Flickinger, 573 F.2d 1349, 1356-57 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 836 , 99 S.Ct. 119 , 58 L.Ed.2d 132 (1978); see also United States v. Collis, 699 F.2d 832, 835 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 3088 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1349 (1983) (district court's finding on whether an illegal seizure has occurred subject to clearly erroneous test).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schor v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Id. at 84 , 102 S.Ct. at 2878 ; see also Kalaris v. Donovan, 697 F.2d 376, 386 (D.C.Cir.) (“Northern Pipeline effectively held that certain private state law claims, when adjudicated within the federal system, must be decided by Article III courts.”) (emphasis in original) (footnote omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 3088 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1349 (1983). 22 CFTC adjudication of Conti’s state law counterclaims is also vulnerable under the second “adjunct” principle announced by Justice Brennan.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William T. Schor v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Conticommodity Services, Inc. And Richard L. Sandor, Mortgage Services of America v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Conticommodity Services, Inc. And Richard L. Sandor
Id. at 84 , 102 S.Ct. at 2878 ; see also Kalaris v. Donovan, 697 F.2d 376, 386 (D.C.Cir.) ("Northern Pipeline effectively held that certain private state law claims, when adjudicated within the federal system, must be decided by Article III courts.") (emphasis in original) (footnote omitted), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 3088 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1349 (1983). 22 38 CFTC adjudication of Conti's state law counterclaims is also vulnerable under the second "adjunct" principle announced by Justice Brennan.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marshall
v.
Doe, on Behalf of Doe, a Minor
v.
Doe, on Behalf of Doe, a Minor
No. 82-1654.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 13, 1983.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.