green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.8 score
“the law requires merely that there be evidence that the defendant committed three substantive offenses - even if not charged in separate indictments - to provide the predicate for a section 848 conviction”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Ramos v. Roman
But cf. Barrett v. United States, 689 F.2d 324, 327-30, 333 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983) (suggesting that a cause of action may in some circumstances accrue only upon discovery of the "wrong” rather than the earlier harm).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Carlos Rivera-Ramos v. Julio Cesar Roman, Cesar Soto, Carlos Rivera-Ramos v. Julio Cesar Roman, Luis Torres-Massa, Carlos Rivera-Ramos v. Julio Cesar Roman
But cf. Barrett v. United States, 689 F.2d 324, 327-30, 333 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983) (suggesting that a cause of action may in some circumstances accrue only upon discovery of the "wrong" rather than the earlier harm)
discussed
Cited "but see"
Rivera-Ramos v. Roman
But cf. Barrett v. United States, 689 F.2d 324, 327-30, 333 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983) (suggesting that a cause of action may in some circumstances accrue only upon discovery of the "wrong” rather than the earlier harm).
cited
Cited "but see"
Zeleznik v. United States
But see Barrett v. United States, 689 F.2d 324 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Zeleznik v. United States
But see Barrett v. United States, 689 F.2d 324 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983). 15 The Zelezniks contend, however, that these cases take too narrow a view of the general principle underlying the discovery rule announced in Kubrick.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Starrett City Associates
See United States v. Bedford Associates, 713 F.2d 895, 904 (2nd Cir.1983); Universal City Studios v. Nintendo Co., 578 F.Supp. 911, 920-921 (S.D.N.Y.1983), aff'd 746 F.2d 112 (2d Cir.1984); but cf. Sperling v. United States, 692 F.2d 223, 227-229 (2nd Cir.1982) (Van Graafeiland, J., concurring), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Robert Sterling
the law requires merely that there be evidence that the defendant committed three substantive offenses - even if not charged in separate indictments - to provide the predicate for a section 848 conviction
discussed
Cited "see"
Leasing One Corp. v. Caterpillar Financial Services Corp.
See In the Matter of Gary Aircraft Corp., 681 F.2d 365, 376 (5th Cir. 1982) (citing National Shawmut Bank v. Jones, 108 N.H. 386 , 236 A.2d 484 (1967), for rule under UCC that where security interest not created by buyer’s seller, last buyer in chain could not take free of interest), ce rt. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3110 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Mancuso v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York
See Barrett v. Hoffman, 521 F.Supp. 307, 320 (S.D.N.Y.1981), rev’d on other grounds, 689 F.2d 324 , 333 (2d Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Sharkey v. Ultramar Energy Ltd.
See United States v. Ingredient Technology Corp., 698 F.2d 88, 94-95 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983) and authorities cited.
cited
Cited "see"
Fifth Third Bank of Southeastern Indiana v. Bentonville Farm Supply, Inc.
See In the Matter of Gary Aircraft Corp. (1982), 5th Cir., 681 F.2d 365, 373 , cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3110 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (applying Texas law).
discussed
Cited "see"
Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of America v. Coaxial Communications of Central Ohio, Inc.
See generally United States v. Ingredient Technology Corp., 698 F.2d 88 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983); see also Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465 , 55 S.Ct. 266 , 79 L.Ed. 596 (1935). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Aracri, John Papandon, and Anthony Zummo
See United States v. Ingredient Technology Corp., 698 F.2d 88, 98-99 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
James R. Wilson v. Linda A. Giesen, County of Lee
See Barrett v. United States, 689 F.2d 324 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983); Rinehart v. Locke, 454 F.2d 313, 315 (7th Cir.1971) (section 1983 claim regarding the fourth amendment accrued at the time of the arrest and search, not when conviction was subsequently reversed); cf. Delaware State College v. Ricks, 449 U.S. 250 , 101 S.Ct. 498 , 66 L.Ed.2d 431 (1980) (section 1981 claim accrued when tenure decision was made and communicated, not when plaintiff was eventually fired).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fletcher
Sec. 6531 (1); see United States v. Ingredient Technology Corp., 698 F.2d 88, 98-99 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fletcher
Statute of Limitations The Fletchers argue that the government had failed to plead and prove that the conspirators committed an overt act within the six-year statute of limitations applicable to tax fraud conspiracies. 26 U.S.C. § 6531 (1); see United States v. Ingredient Technology Corp., 698 F.2d 88, 98-99 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lang
See United States v. Ingredient Technology Corp., 698 F.2d 88, 96 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983); United States v. Newman, 664 F.2d 12, 19 (2d Cir.1981); United States v. Naftalin, 441 U.S. 768, 778 , 99 S.Ct. 2077, 2084 , 60 L.Ed.2d 624 (1979); United States v. Persky, 520 F.2d 283, 288 (2d Cir.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Continental Illinois National Bank And Trust Company Of Chicago
See In re Gary Aircraft Corp., 681 F.2d 365, 373 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3110 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983); In re Air Vermont, Inc., 44 B.R. 433, 437 (D.Vt.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States ex rel. Maritime Administration v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago
See In re Gary Aircraft Corp., 681 F.2d 365, 373 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3110 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983); In re Air Vermont, Inc., 44 B.R. 433, 437 (D.Vt.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mauser
See United States v. Ingredient Technology Corp., 698 F.2d 88, 99 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983); United States v. White, 671 F.2d 1126, 1134 (8th Cir.1982); United States v. Lowder, 492 F.2d 953, 955-56 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1092 , 95 S.Ct. 685 , 42 L.Ed.2d 685 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Sybil Young and Roderick Young v. United States Department of Justice, Sybil Young and Roderick Young v. Chemical Bank, N.A.
See Sperling v. United States, 692 F.2d 223, 227-29 (2d Cir.1982) (Van Graafeiland, J., concurring), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1181 , 103 S.Ct. 8111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Agee Atkins and William S. Hack
See United States v. Ingredient Technology Corp., 698 F.2d 88, 96 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983); United States v. Carruth, 699 F.2d 1017, 1021 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 698 , 79 L.Ed.2d 164 (1984); United States v. Winograd, 656 F.2d 279, 282-83 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 1612 , 71 L.Ed.2d 848 (1982); United States v. Fruehauf Corp., 577 F.2d 1038, 1067-68 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 953 , 99 S.Ct. 349 , 58 L.Ed.2d 344 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter D. Brodie, United States of America v. Nancy A. Brodie
See United States v. Ingredient Technology Corp., 698 F.2d 88, 97 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paccar, Inc. And Subsidiaries v. Commissioner Internal Revenue Service
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Rev.Rul. 83-59, 1983- 1 C.B. 103 , 106. 3 The Second Circuit decision in United States v. Ingredient Technology Corp., 698 F.2d 88 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983), is particularly appropriate here.
cited
Cited "see"
Guccione v. United States
See Barrett v. United States, 689 F.2d 324, 327 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied 462 U.S. 1181 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Atkins
See United States v. Ingredient Technology, 698 F.2d 88, 94-95 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983); United States v. Winograd, 656 F.2d 279, 282-83 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied sub nom., Siegel v. United States, 455 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 1612 , 71 L.Ed.2d 848 (1982); Julien v. Commissioner, 82 T.C. 492 (1984). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James C. Russell, Earhl R. Schooff, and Lawrence M. Richey
(2×)
See United States v. Ingredient Technology Corp., 698 F.2d 88, 96 (2d Cir.) (“it is immaterial that ‘there is no litigated fact pattern precisely in point’ ”), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Carpenter, Kenneth P. Felis, and R. Foster Winans
(2×)
See United States v. Ingredient Technology Corp., 698 F.2d 88, 96 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983); United States v. Bohonus, 628 F.2d 1167, 1174 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 928 , 100 S.Ct. 3026 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1122 (1980). 26 Finally, we do not agree with the position taken in the brief of amici curiae that the district court's decision portends First Amendment infringements.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Standard Drywall Corp.
See United States v. Ingredient Technology Corp., 698 F.2d 88, 98 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James G. Mallas Robert v. Jones, Jr., (Two Cases)
See United States v. Ingredient Technology Corp., 698 F.2d 88, 96-97 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Henderson
See Sperling v. United States, 692 F.2d 223, 225-26 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983); Alessi v. United States, 653 F.2d 66, 68-69 (2d Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Joseph Allan Wilson v. Hon. Robert J. Henderson, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility
See Sperling v. United States, 692 F.2d 223, 225-26 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983); Alessi v. United States, 653 F.2d 66, 68-69 (2d Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co.
See Konstantinidis v. Chen, 626 F.2d 933, 938 (D.C.Cir.1980) (“judicial estoppel has not been followed by anything approaching a majority of jurisdictions, nor is there a discernible modern trend in that direction.”) Parkinson v. California Company, 233 F.2d 432, 437-38 (10th Cir.1956) (judicial estoppel “reflects the minority viewpoint which has encountered inhospitable reception outside the state of Tennessee.") But cf. Sperling v. United States, 692 F.2d 223, 227-29 (2d Cir.1982) (Van Graafciland, J., concurring), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983). 4 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dachman v. United States
See Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. United States, 855 F.2d at 1577-78 ; Welcker v. United States, 752 F.2d 1577, 1580 (Fed.Cir.1985) (“ ‘Once plaintiff is on inquiry that it has a potential claim, the statute can start to run.’ ”) (quoting Japanese War Notes Claimants Ass’n v. United States, 178 Ct.Cl. 630 , 373 F.2d 356, 359 (1967)), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 826 , 106 S.Ct. 83 , 88 L.Ed.2d 68 (1985); see also Barrett v. United States, 689 F.2d 324, 329-30 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kernisant v. City of New York
See, e.g., Barrett v. United States, 689 F.2d 324, 331 (2d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983); see also N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Certain Pharmaceuticals & Proceedings of Northland Providers, Inc.
See, United States v. Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, 889 F.2d 1248 (2nd Cir.1989) (holding that burden of proving “buyer in the ordinary course of business” status, under Section 9-307, is on the party asserting such status); see also, In the Matter of Gary Aircraft Corp., 681 F.2d 365, 373 , cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3110 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (Tex.1983) (applying Texas law); International Harvester Co. v. Glendenning, 505 S.W.2d 320, 324 (Tex.Civ.App.1974); In re Air Vermont, Inc., 44 B.R. 433, 437 (Bkrtcy.D.Vt.1984); Transamerica Commercial Fi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ervin J. Klaphake
As a general rule, “questions of law are the subject of the court’s instructions and not the subject of expert testimony.” United States v. Vreeken, 803 F.2d 1085, 1091 (10th Cir.1986), *439 ce rt. denied, 479 U.S. 1067, 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987); see also, e.g., United States v. Ingredient Technology Corp., 698 F.2d 88, 97 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pagnucco v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
See Floyd v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., supra, 872 F.2d at 1489 ; Pekelis v. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc., supra, 187 F.2d at 124 ; see also United States v. Ingredient Technology Corp., 698 F.2d 88, 97 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Air Disaster At Lockerbie Scotland On December 21, 1988
See Floyd v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., supra, 872 F.2d at 1489 ; Pekelis v. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc., supra, 187 F.2d at 124 ; see also United States v. Ingredient Technology Corp., 698 F.2d 88, 97 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael C. Veal v. Anthony Geraci, Detective, New York City Police Department and John Doe, Police Officer, New York City Police Department
See, e.g., Barrett v. United States, 689 F.2d 324, 333 (2d Cir.1982) (§ 1983 claim accrues only after claimant knows or has reason to know of both the harm and the cause of the harm), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983); Freeze v. Griffith, 849 F.2d 172, 175 (5th Cir.1988) (claim alleging sheriffs conspiracy to deny claimant a fair trial accrued not upon conviction but upon the later discovery of sheriff’s allegedly improper conduct).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Edwin L. Bricker v. Rockwell International Corporation
See, e.g., Zurn Indus., Inc. v. NLRB, 680 F.2d 683, 694 (9th Cir.1982) (the NLRB "has jurisdiction to investigate unfair labor practices, which include discharges based on protected activity such as voicing safety complaints"), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3110 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bricker v. Rockwell International Corp.
See, e.g., Zurn Indus., Inc. v. NLRB, 680 F.2d 683, 694 (9th Cir.1982) (the NLRB “has jurisdiction to investigate unfair labor practices, which include discharges based on protected activity such as voicing safety complaints”), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3110 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bricker v. Rockwell International Corp.
See, e.g., Zurn Indus., Inc. v. NLRB, 680 F.2d 683, 694 (9th Cir.1982) (the NLRB “has jurisdiction to investigate unfair labor practices, which include discharges based on protected activity such as voicing safety complaints”), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3110 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bricker v. Rockwell International Corporation
See, e.g., Zurn Indus., Inc. v. NLRB, 680 F.2d 683, 694 (9th Cir.1982) (the NLRB "has jurisdiction to investigate unfair labor practices, which include discharges based on protected activity such as voicing safety complaints"), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3110 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
DBL Liquidating Trust v. P.T. Tirtamas Majutama (In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.)
See also Sperling v. United States, 692 F.2d 223, 228-29 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Stone v. Williams
See, e.g., Barrett v. United States, 689 F.2d 324, 327 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Stone v. Williams
See, e.g., Barrett v. United States, 689 F.2d 324, 327 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ortiz v. Morgenthau
See Tadros v. Coleman, 898 F.2d 10, 12 (2d Cir.1990) (section 1981), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 186 , 112 L.Ed.2d 149 (1990); Hernandez-Avila v. Averill, 725 F.2d 25, 27 n. 3 (2d Cir.1984) (sections 1981, 1983, 1985). 42 U.S.C. § 1986 by its own terms requires that claims brought thereunder be “commenced within one year after the cause of action has accrued.” 1 The time of accrual for this action is “that point in time when the plaintiff [knew] or ha[d] reason to know of the injury which is the basis of his action.” Singleton v. City of New York, 632 F.2d 185, 192 (2d Cir.1980…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fleischman v. Grinker
The Second Circuit has repeatedly held that a claim brought under § 1983 accrues when the plaintiff “ ‘knows or has reason to know’ of the injury that is the basis of the action.” Cullen, supra, 811 F.2d at 725 (quoting Pauk v. Board of Trustees of City University of New York, 654 F.2d 856, 859 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982)); see also Barrett v. United States, 689 F.2d 324, 333 (2d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David v. Showtime/The Movie Channel, Inc.
Compare Sperling v. United States, 692 F.2d 223, 227-29 (2d Cir.1982) (Van Graafeiland, J., concurring) (advocating application of the doctrine to case in which habeas petitioner had obtained previous appellate relief with misleading assurances to the court about the continued vitality of a related conviction and life sentence, which he subsequently attacked in the new petition before the court), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983), with Horger v. New York University Medical Center, 642 F.Supp. 976, 980-81 (S.D.N.Y. 1986) (refusing to apply the doctrine to med…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mundt
v.
NL Industries, Inc. and NL Industries, Inc. v. Mundt
v.
NL Industries, Inc. and NL Industries, Inc. v. Mundt
No. 82-1389; No. 82-1489.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 20, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 705 F. 2d 456.