green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.4 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“There is no commercial exception to Noerr-Pennington.”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Greenwood Utilities Commission v. Mississippi Power Company, Greenwood Utilities Commission v. Mississippi Power Company
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
But see In re Airport Car Rental Antitrust Litigation, 693 F.2d 84, 87-88 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 3114 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1368 (1983) (holding that there is no “commercial exception” to the Noerr-Pennington doctrine). -1- Applying the Noerr-Pennington doctrine to the relationship between SEPA and the Southern companies, we conclude that the bilateral monopoly relationship *1499 about which Greenwood complains, if it existed, was lawfully created.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Forest Ambulance Service, Inc. v. Mercy Ambulance of Richmond, Inc.
there is no commercial exception to noerr-pennington.
discussed
Cited "see"
Perryman v. State
(2×)
Further, a jury trial is "fundamental to the American scheme of justice..." Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 149 [, 88 S.Ct. 1444 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491 ] (1968); accord Samudio v. State, 648 S.W.2d 312 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 [, 103 S.Ct. 3113 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1368 ] (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marquez v. State
(2×)
Further, a jury trial is "fundamental to the American scheme of justice ..." Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 149 , 88 S.Ct. 1444, 1447 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491 (1968); accord Samudio v. State, 648 S.W.2d 312 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3113 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1368 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Chaouachi v. State
See Samudio v. State, 635 S.W.2d 183, 185 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.1982], aff'd, 648 S.W.2d 312 (Tex.Crim.App.), ce rt. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3113 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1368 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris County District Attorney's Office v. D.W.B.
See Samudio v. State, 648 S.W.2d 312, 313 (Tex.Crim.App.), cer t. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3113 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1368 (1983). 2 Appel-lee sought by his habeas application to be discharged “from further confinement pursuant to the illegal judgment and sentence [in the 1981 county criminal court at law case].” On November 2,1990, the trial court granted habeas corpus relief and noted in its handwritten order, “judgment in cause No. 630920 set aside and vacated.” The State did not appeal the grant of habeas corpus relief.
discussed
Cited "see"
Alaska Cargo Transport, Inc. v. Alaska Railroad
Boone, 841 F.2d at 895 ; see In re Airport Car Rental Antitrust Litigation, 521 F.Supp. 568, 588 (N.D.Cal.1981), aff'd 693 F.2d 84 (9th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 462 U.S. 1133 , 103 S.Ct. 3114 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1368 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boone v. Redevelopment Agency
See In re Airport Car Rental Antitrust Litigation, 521 F.Supp. 568, 588 (N.D.Cal.1981) (evidence of a series of ex parte meetings between defendants and public officials resulting in a contract to exclude competitors “prove[s] nothing other than a classic case for application of the Noerr-Pennington doctrine”), aff'd, 693 F.2d 84 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1133 , 103 S.Ct. 3114 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1368 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boone v. Redevelopment Agency of City of San Jose
See In re Airport Car Rental Antitrust Litigation, 521 F.Supp. 568, 588 (N.D.Cal.1981) (evidence of a series of ex parte meetings between defendants and public officials resulting in a contract to exclude competitors "prove[s] nothing other than a classic case for application of the Noerr-Pennington doctrine"), aff'd, 693 F.2d 84 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1133 , 103 S.Ct. 3114 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1368 (1983). 40 The developers' allegations of "payments to" and the "hiring of" key city officials suffer a similar fate.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sessions Tank Liners, Inc. Dba Southwest Tank Liners, Inc. v. Joor Manufacturing, Inc.
See In re Airport Car Rental Antitrust Litigation, 521 F.Supp. 568, 574 (N.D.Cal.1981) (“if plaintiff suffered injury, it resulted from the acts of public officials .'.. not the joint action of defendants”), aff'd, 693 F.2d 84 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1133 , 103 S.Ct. 3114 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1368 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
John Woolen, John D. Campisi, Individually and as Class Action , and Carl Whorton, Intervenors-Appellants v. Surtran Taxicabs, Inc., Ken Whorton v. City of Dallas, Texas
See In re Airport Car Rental Antitrust Litigation, 521 F.Supp. 568, 587-90 (N.D.Cal.1981), aff'd, 693 F.2d 84 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1133 , 103 S.Ct. 3114 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1368 (1983). 102 Plaintiffs' contention that the private defendants' actions fall within the co-conspirator exception to the Noerr-Pennington doctrine is without merit.
cited
Cited "see"
Woolen v. Campisi
See In re Airport Car Rental Antitrust Litigation, 521 F.Supp. 568, 587-90 (N.D.Cal.1981), aff'd, 693 F.2d 84 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1133 , 103 S.Ct. 3114 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1368 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Woolen v. Surtran Taxicabs, Inc.
See In re Airport Car Rental Antitrust Litigation, 521 F.Supp. 568, 587-90 (N.D.Cal.1981), aff’d, 693 F.2d 84 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1133 , 103 S.Ct. 3114 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1368 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Griffin
See Samudio v. State, 648 S.W.2d 312 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert denied, — U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 3113 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1368 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Morton v. State
See, e.g., Samudio v. State, 648 S.W.2d 312 (Tex.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3113 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1368 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Traweek v. City and County of San Francisco
See also In re Airport Antitrust Litigation, 521 F.Supp. 568, 573-588 (N.D.Cal.1981), aff'd, 693 F.2d 84 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1133 , 103 S.Ct. 3114 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1368 (1983). 20 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Association of Flight Attendants v. Republic Airlines, Inc.
See also Stevens v. Gateway Transportation Co., 696 F.2d 500, 503 (7th Cir.1982) (“That Congress has not enacted a statute of limitations expressly governing plaintiffs’ claims does not mean that national interests are any less implicated by the choice of an appropriate limitations period than if Congress had enacted such a statute.”), ce rt. denied, 452 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3113 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1368 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Texas
v.
Samudio
v.
Samudio
No. 82-1726.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 20, 1983.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: E.D. Virginia (1)
Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.