green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.2 score
“focusing on after-tax earnings is an exercise in economic fairness; by this decision we extend it at least to all federal law claims for future lost wages.”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
MEDICAL MUTUAL LIABILITY INS. SOCIETY OF MD. v. B. Dixon Evander & Associates, Inc.
But see Tarlton v. Exxon, 688 F.2d 973, 978 (5th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1206 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983) (trial court’s power to grant new trial sua sponte under Rule 59(a) must be exercised within ten days after entry of judgment on the verdict; not ten days after “final judgment”); Cormier v .
cited
Cited "but see"
Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Elliott Travel & Tours, Inc. And Jared Schubiner
But see Donovan v. Sabine Irrigation Co., 695 F.2d 190, 194 (5th Cir.) (whether party is employer is question of fact), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3537 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983).
cited
Cited "but see"
Sendhabhai Patel v. Dr. Alex Wargo, Etc.
But see Donovan v. Sabine Irrigation Co., 695 F.2d 190, 194 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3537 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983). 2 .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ruff v. Weintraub
focusing on after-tax earnings is an exercise in economic fairness; by this decision we extend it at least to all federal law claims for future lost wages.
cited
Cited "see"
Reich v. Cole Enterprises, Inc.
See, Donovan v. Sabine Irrigation Co., 695 F.2d 190, 194-95 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3537 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reich v. Circle C. Investments
See Donovan v. Sabine Irrigation Co., 695 F.2d 190, 196 (5th Cir.) (recognizing that if an individual is deemed an employer under the FLSA, he may be enjoined along with the corporate employer), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3537 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reich v. Circle C. Investments, Inc.
See Donovan v. Sabine Irrigation Co., 695 F.2d 190, 196 (5th Cir.) (recognizing that if an individual is deemed an employer under the FLSA, he may be enjoined along with the corporate employer), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3537 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Scutieri v. Estate of Revitz
See Tarlton v. Exxon, 688 F.2d 973 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1206 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carpenters District Council v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.
See Donovan v. Sabine Immigration Co., Inc., 695 F.2d 190, 194-95 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3537 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983), (individual who effectively dominates a corporation’s administration or otherwise acts, or has power to act, on behalf of the corporation vis-a-vis its employees is an employer under FLSA); Marchak v. Observer Publications, Inc., 493 F.Supp. 278, 282 (D.R.I.1980) (“officers of corporations are routinely held to be ‘employers’ within the meaning of the FLSA and thus proper parties in actions for unpaid wages and overtime compensation.�…
cited
Cited "see"
Cooper v. Offshore Express, Inc.
See Tarlton v. Exxon, 688 F.2d 973, 976-77 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1206 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Tedesco v. Mishkin
See Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District, 690 F.2d 470 , 485 n. 27 (5th Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
House v. Cannon Mills Co.
See Donovan v. Sabine Irrigation Co., Inc., 695 F.2d 190, 194-95 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3537 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983) (individual held liable for wages due despite lack of possessory interest in the corporate employer; individual remains “accountable for violations of the FLSA if he independently exercised control over the work situation."); Donovan v. Agnew, 712 F.2d 1509 (1st Cir.1983). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Harmon
See Ex parte O'Leary , 417 So.2d 232 (Ala. 1982), cert. denied, O'Leary v. Alabama , 463 U.S. 1206 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983) (the issue must be preserved at the lower court level before it can be reviewed on appeal).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schaill Ex Rel. Kross v. Tippecanoe County School Corp.
See, Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District, 690 F.2d 470 , 477 (5th Cir.1982), reh. denied, 693 F.2d 524 (1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983); Jones v. Latexo Independent School District, 499 F.Supp. 223 (E.D.Tex.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Donald L. Snellman D/B/A Norfin v. Ricoh Company Ltd.
See Tarlton v. Exxon, 688 F.2d 973, 977-79 (5th Cir.1982) (reversing grant of new trial to a defendant who sought no relief during the 10-day period though another defendant filed a timely new trial motion), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1206 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
James W. Grant and Delores Grant, Stairs Manufactured Housing, Inc. v. County of Seminole, Florida
See Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District, 690 F.2d 470 , 484 (5th Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Margaret Lopez, Individually and as Next Friend of John Adam Lopez, Plaintiff v. Houston Independent School District
See Horton v. Goose Creek Ind. School Dist., 690 E.2d 470, 480 (5th Cir.1982) (duty to protect students from harm posed by anti-social activities), ce rt. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barrett v. United States
See Fanetti v. Hellenic Lines Ltd., 678 F.2d 424, 431 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied 463 U.S. 1206 , 103 S.Ct. 3535 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983) (holding that it would be unfair to the defendant if expected taxes were not subtracted from an award in an LHWCA case, and that taxes must be subtracted from claims for future wages based solely on federal law because of “strong federal policies of fairness and efficiency in litigation of federal claims”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pooley v. State
See Horton v. Goose Creek Ind. School District, 690 F.2d 470 (5th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983); Jones v. Latexo Ind. School District, 499 F.Supp. 223, 236 (E.D.Tex.1980); Gardner, Sniffing for Drugs in the Classroom — Perspectives on Fourth Amendment Scope, 74 Nw.U.L.Rev. 803 (1980); Comment, Search and Seizure in Public Schools: Are Our Children's Rights Going to the Dogs? 24 St.
cited
Cited "see"
Parish v. State
See O'Leary v. State , 417 So.2d 232 , 240 (Ala. 1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1206 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
McBirney v. Autrey
See Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District, 690 F.2d 470 , 483-84 and n. 25 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Guthrie v. Borough of Wilkinsburg
(2×)
See Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District, 690 F.2d 470 , 483 (5th Cir.1982) cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983). [10] The record in this case does not indicate whether or not appellants had a collective bargaining agreement, or whether they grieved the issued warnings under a grievance procedure. [1] In defining those property interests which are protected by the United States Constitution, the United States Supreme Court has held that [t]o have a property interest in a benefit, a person clearly must have more than an abstract need or desire for it.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Maria Vega-Barvo
(2×)
Accord Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District, 690 F.2d 470 , 479 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983) (although “canine sniff” is a search when dog physically touches person it might not be a search if it could be performed from a distance).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rhodes v. National Collection Systems, Inc.
See, e.g., Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District, 690 F.2d 470 , 484 (6th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Maez v. Springs Automotive Group, LLC
See, e.g., Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District, 690 F.2d 470 , 484 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. v. Dynegy, Inc.
See also Horton v. Goose Creek Ind. School Dist., 690 F.2d 470 , 484 & n. 25 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983) (Although “[tjechnically, only the requirements of section (a) of Rule 23 are ‘prerequisites’ to a class action,” the Fifth Circuit treats “qualification for a Rule 23(b) category as a prerequisite to class actions.”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wing Wong v. East River Chinese Restaurant
See, e.g., Donovan v. Sabine Irrigation Co., Inc., 695 F.2d 190, 194-95 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3537 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Nash
See, e.g., Ex parte O'Leary, 417 So.2d 232, 240 (Ala. 1982) (parties have a right to have questions answered truthfully to enable them to exercise their challenges wisely), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1206 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Longden v. Sunderman
While the reliance issue may prove to be the most troubling to the continued maintenance of the class, “the interests of justice require that in a doubtful case, ..., any error, if there is to be one, should be committed in favor of allowing the class action.” Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 101 (10th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); see also Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District, 690 F.2d 470 , 487 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983). (3) Causation Andersen also challenges Plaintiff…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Secretary of Labor v. Frank E. Fitzsimmons, David Dutchak, and Secretary of Labor, Intervening v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Etc., Chester Sullivan, and Secretary of Labor, Intervening v. Estate of Frank E. Fitzsimmons
See, e.g., Horton v. Goose Creek, Ind. School Dist., 690 F.2d 470 , 484 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983); Susman v. Lincoln American Corp., 561 F.2d 86, 90 (7th Cir.1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
John F. \Jack\" Walsh v. Ford Motor Company"
See, e.g., Horton v. Goose Creek Ind. School Dist., 677 F.2d 471, 490 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983). 93 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Secretary of Labor v. Fitzsimmons
See, e.g., Horton v. Goose Creek, Ind. School Dist., 690 F.2d 470 , 484 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983); Susman v. Lincoln American Corp., 561 F.2d 86, 90 (7th Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donovan v. Estate of Fitzsimmons
See, e.g., Horton v. Goose Creek, Ind. School Disk, 690 F.2d 470 , 484 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983); Susman v. Lincoln American Corp., 561 F.2d 86, 90 (7th Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor v. Estate of Frank E. Fitzsimmons, David Dutchak, Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, Intervening v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chester J. Sullivan, Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, Intervening v. Estate of Frank E. Fitzsimmons
See, e.g., Horton v. Goose Creek, Ind. School Dist., 690 F.2d 470 , 484 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983); Susman v. Lincoln American Corp., 561 F.2d 86, 90 (7th Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Joseph T.
(2×)
See also In re Donaldson, 269 Cal. App.2d 509 , 75 Cal.Rptr. 220 (1969), and Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District, 690 F.2d 470 , reh'g denied, 693 F.2d 524 , 525 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donovan v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.
See, e.g., Donovan v. Sabine Irrigation Co., 695 F.2d 190, 194-95 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 3537 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983); Marshall v. Sam Dell’s Dodge Corp., 451 F.Supp. 294, 296 (N.D.N.Y. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Christopher Beale
See, e.g., Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District, 690 F.2d 470 , 479 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983) (holding that use of dogs to sniff students in class was a search); Loewy, The Fourth Amendment as a Device for Protecting the Innocent, 81 Mich.L.Rev. 1229, 1246-47 (1983) ("the very act of being subjected to a body sniff by a German Shepherd may be offensive at best or harrowing at worst to the innocent sniffee”) (footnote omitted). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Christopher Beale
See, e.g., Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District, 690 F.2d 470 , 477 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 3536 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983); United States v. Sullivan, 625 F.2d 9, 13 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1374 , 67 L.Ed.2d 352 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donovan v. Agnew
See, e.g, Donovan v. Sabine Irrigation Co., Inc., 695 F.2d 190,194-95 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 3537 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1983); Marchak v. Observer Publications, Inc., 493 F.Supp. 278, 282 (D.R.I. 1980); Brennan v. Whatley, 432 F.Supp. 465, 469 (E.D.Tex.1977); Hodgson v. Royal Crown Bottling Co., 324 F.Supp. 342, 347 (D.Miss.1970), aff’d, 465 F.2d 473 (5th Cir. 1972); Schultz v. Chalk-Fitzgerald Construction Co., 309 F.Supp. 1255 (D.Mass. 1970); cf. Chambers Construction Co. v. Mitchell, 233 F.2d 717, 724-25 (8th Cir.1956) (corporate officer within definition of “emp…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Schell
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-1584.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of New Jersey (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.