green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1997 ·
…just as winning litigants may not bolster the preclusive effect of final judgments by deliberately mooting questions on appeal, so losing litigants may not destroy their preclusive effect by adopting the same ploy.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
In the Matter of Inspection of the Workplace Located at 526 Catalan Street, St. Louis, Missouri Under the Control or Custody of Carondelet Coke Corporation. Appeal of Occupational Safety and Health Administration. In the Matter of Inspection of the Workplace Located at 526 Catalan Street, St. Louis, Missouri, Under the Control or Custody of Carondelet Coke Corporation. Appeal of Carondelet Coke Corporation
But see Donovan v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 694 F.2d 1213, 1216 (9th Cir.1982),cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 3538 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1388 (1983) (reaffirms rule allowing general inspections on basis of employee complaint unless extraordinary circumstances established). 29 In upholding the broader search, we have taken the middle course and, in addition to the employee complaint, found the following factors present in this case to be significant. 1) The magistrate had an opportunity to observe the demeanor of Leo Boyer and expressly rejected the argument that this complaint was motivated b…
discussed
Cited "but see"
In re Inspection of the Workplace
But see Donovan v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 694 F.2d 1213, 1216 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 3538 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1388 (1983) (reaffirms rule allowing general inspections on basis of employee complaint unless extraordinary circumstances established). warrant (excluding the low hazard areas of the facility).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Remus Joint Venture v. McAnally
just as winning litigants may not bolster the preclusive effect of final judgments by deliberately mooting questions on appeal, so losing litigants may not destroy their preclusive effect by adopting the same ploy.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Remus Joint Venture v. McAnally
just as winning litigants may not bolster the preclusive effect of final judgments by deliberately mooting questions on appeal, so losing litigants may not destroy their preclusive effect by adopting the same ploy.
cited
Cited "see"
Leach v. Building and Safety Engineering Div., City of Pontiac
See State of Wisconsin v. Baker, 698 F.2d 1323, 1327 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3537 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1388 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Penguin Books USA Incorporated Jeffrey R. Toobin v. Lawrence E. Walsh Office of Independent Counsel
See Wisconsin v. Baker, 698 F.2d 1323, 1330-31 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3537 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1388 (1983); Federal Trade Commission v. Food Town Stores, Inc., 547 F.2d 247, 249 (4th Cir.1977).
cited
Cited "see"
National Starch and Chemical Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Ellis Banking Corp. v. Commissioner, 688 F.2d 1376 , 1379 n. 7 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3537 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1388 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Matter of Grand Jury Subpoena of June 12, 1986
See Donovan v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 694 F.2d 1213, 1216 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3538 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1388 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Burlington Northern, Incorporated
See Donovan v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 694 F.2d 1213, 1216 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3538 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1388 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Nixon v. Individual Head of St. Joseph Mortgage Co.
See State of Wisconsin v. Baker, 698 F.2d 1323, 1327 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3537 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1388 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Estate of Ralph D. Cowser, Deceased, Patricia Ann Tucker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Metzger Trust v. Commissioner, 76 T.C. 42, 80 (1981), aff'd, 693 F.2d 459 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 3537 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1388 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Central Texas Savings & Loan Association v. United States
See Ellis Banking Corp. v. Commissioner, 688 F.2d 1376, 1379 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 3537 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1388 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
William C. Lyddan v. United States
Sydnes v. Commissioner, 68 T.C. 170, 176 (1977), rev’d in part, 577 F.2d 60 (1978); see Metzger Trust v. Commissioner, 693 F.2d 459, 467 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 3537 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1388 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas James Ponchik, A/K/A Thomas John Shallan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Revenue Agent R. Wallin and Revenue Agent K. Cederholm
See, e.g., Ellis Banking Corp. v. Commissioner, 688 F.2d 1376 , 1383 & n. 12 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3537 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1388 (1983). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Campbell Taggart, Inc. v. United States
See, e.g., Ellis Banking Corp. v. Commissioner, 688 F.2d 1376 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 3537 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1388 (1983) (expenditures for investigation of corporation in connection with proposed acquisition; held, not deductible as ordinary and necessary business expense).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hoffman
v.
Minnesota Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board
v.
Minnesota Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board
No. 82-1779.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (2)
Sup. Ct. Minn. Cer-tiorari denied.