green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
11.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1987 ·
…a federal court's jurisdiction is not determined by its power to issue a subpoena; its power to issue a subpoena is determined by its jurisdiction.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, (Billy J. Williams, Gj88-1) v. United States
(2×)
But see United States v. Davis, 702 F.2d 418, 422-23 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1215 , 103 S.Ct. 3554 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983) (refusing to quash a grand jury subpoena seeking depositions in a civil case given with an understanding of confidentiality); United States v. GAF Corp., 596 F.2d 10, 16 (2d Cir.1979) (not allowing the Department of Justice to use a civil investigative demand to reach discovery materials in private litigation under protective order). 5 .
discussed
Cited "but see"
In re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum Special Grand Jury, September, 1986 Term.
(2×)
But cf. United States v. Davis, 702 F.2d 418, 422 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1215 , 103 S.Ct. 3554 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983) (the assertion by the defendant that he relied on an "understanding of confidentiality” was evaluated by the court but rejected). .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re United States Catholic Conference
a federal court's jurisdiction is not determined by its power to issue a subpoena; its power to issue a subpoena is determined by its jurisdiction.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Abortion Rights Mobilization, Inc. v. Baker
a federal court's jurisdiction is not determined by its power to issue a subpoena; its power to issue a subpoena is determined by its jurisdiction.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Marc Rich & Co. A.G., a Swiss Corporation. Marc Rich & Co. A.G. v. United States
marc rich i
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated March 24, 2003 Directed to (A) Grand Jury Witness Firm and (B) Grand Jury Witness
In re John Doe, Inc., 13 F.3d 633, 636 (2d Cir.1994); accord In re Marc Rich & Co., 707 F.2d 663, 670 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1215 , 103 S.Ct. 3555 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983); In re Grand Jury Subpoena dated August 9, 2000, 218 F.Supp.2d 544, 551 (S.D.N.Y.2002), aff'd, 318 F.3d 379 (2d Cir. 2003). 64 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings
(2×)
See generally In re Marc Rich & Co., 707 F.2d 663, 670 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1215 , 77 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Enforce Administrative Subpoenas Duces Tecum of the Securities & Exchange Commission v. Knowles
See Marc Rich & Co. v. United States (In re Marc Rich & Co.), 707 F.2d 663, 668 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1215 , 103 S.Ct. 3555 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983); FTC v. Compagnie de Saint-Gobain-Pont-a-Mousson, 636 F.2d 1300, 1324 (D.C.Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lloyd Ray Piche, United States of America v. Lloyd Ray Piche
(2×)
See United States v. Harris, 701 F.2d 1095, 1101 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 3554 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Extradition of Montiel Garcia
See In re Marc Rich & Co., 707 F.2d 663, 666 (2d Cir.) (“territorial,” “protective,” “universality,” and “passive” being the other four), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1215 , 103 S.Ct. 3555 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles E. Isom
(2×)
See United States v. Harris, 701 F.2d 1095, 1103 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 3554 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983) (juries return inconsistent verdicts because they do not always speak their real conclusion).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Sealed Case
See Marc Rich & Co. v. United States, 707 F.2d 663, 670 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1215 , 103 S.Ct. 3555 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Marvin Hamilton v. Richard M. Daley
See Freeman v. Franzen, 695 F.2d 485, 494 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 3553 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983); Sanchez v. Schwartz, 688 F.2d 503, 506-07 (7th Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Spanish Action Committee of Chicago v. City of Chicago, and Thomas Braham, James Zarno and William Duffy
See Freement v. Franzen, 695 F.2d 485, 488 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 3553 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Robert Landau Associates, Inc.
(2×)
See United States v. Davis, 702 F.2d 418, 423 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1215 , 103 S.Ct. 3554 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983) (government granted access to documents sealed in the bankruptcy court in view of provision of protective order which allowed entity examined by trustee to disclose the information deemed confidential to any person or entity).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. George G. Davis
See In re Marc Rich & Co., A.G., 707 F.2d 663, 666 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1215 , 103 S.Ct. 3555 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983); Laker, supra, 731 F.2d at 921-22; Restatement (Revised) § 402(l)(c) (Tent.
examined
Cited "see"
Evans v. State
(4×)
See United States v. Harris, 701 F.2d 1095, 1101 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, -— U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 3554 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983) (no requirement “that the death be the direct and intended result of the violation”); United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 820-822 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979) (involving the identical language under 18 U.S.C. § 242 ); United States v. Guillette, 547 F.2d 743 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 839 , 98 S.Ct. 132 , 54 L.Ed.2d 102 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wright
(2×)
See United States v. Harris, 701 F.2d 1095, 1103 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 3554 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Corey Wright, United States of America v. Perry Puccinelli, United States of America v. Terry Stearns, United States of America v. Terry Stearns
(2×)
See United States v. Harris, 701 F.2d 1095, 1103 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 3554 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated September 15, 1983 Marc Rich & Co. A.G., Intervenor-Appellant v. United States
See Matter of Marc Rich & Co., A.G., 707 F.2d 663 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 3555 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983) (“Marc Rich F’).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Mussry
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Harris, 701 F.2d 1095 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 3554 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983); United States v. Booker, 655 F.2d 562 (4th Cir.1981); United States v. Bibbs, 564 F.2d 1165 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1007 , 98 S.Ct. 1877 , 56 L.Ed.2d 388 (1978).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Mussry
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Harris, 701 F.2d 1095 (4th Cir.), cert, denied,-U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 3554 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983); United States v. Booker, 655 F.2d 562 (4th Cir.1981); United States v. Bibbs, 564 F.2d 1165 (5th Cir. 1977), cert, denied, 435 U.S. 1007 , 98 S.Ct. 1877 , 56 L.Ed.2d 388 . (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Herndon Ex Rel. Herndon v. Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Board of Education
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Harris, 701 F.2d 1095, 1100 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 3554 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983) (upholding convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 1584 based on the defendants’ use of physical coercion, and stating that “it is clear that a mere reminder by the employer that the consequences of leaving will be exceedingly bad {e.g., deportation) is not enough” to support a conviction under the statute (citing United States v. Shackney, 333 F.2d 475 (2d Cir.1964) (holding that a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1584 could not be supported “by a threat to hav…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dale R. Javino
Though Congress may prescribe laws concerning conduct outside of the territorial boundaries of the United States “that has or is intended to have substantial effect” within the United States, Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law § 402(l)(c) (1987) (“Restatement”); see, e.g., In re Marc Rich & Co., A.G., 707 F.2d 663, 666 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1215 , 103 S.Ct. 3555 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983); see also Restatement § 402(l)(a), (b), (2), and (3) (setting forth additional accepted bases for extraterritorial application of legislation), it *1143 may not regulate such con…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anspacher & Associates, Inc. v. Wayne Henderson
See, e.g., Freeman v. Franzen, 695 F.2d 485, 488 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 3553 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983). 35 Anspacher raises two more claims of error which we need to address.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Anspacher & Associates, Inc. v. Henderson
See, e.g., Freeman v. Franzen, 695 F.2d 485, 488 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 3553 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony Frank Gaggi, Henry Borelli, Peter Lafroscia, Ronald Ustica, Edward Rendini and Ronald Turekian
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Harris, 701 F.2d 1095 , 1102 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 3554 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983); United States v. King, 587 F.2d 209, 211 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1536 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979); Wilkins v. United States, 376 F.2d 552, 561 (5th Cir. 1967); Powe v. United States, 109 F.2d 147, 149 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 309 U.S. 679 , 60 S.Ct. 717 , 84 L.Ed. 1023 (1940); United States v. Patrick, 54 F. 338, 342-43 (C.C.M.D.Tenn.1893); United States v. Wheeler, 254 F. 611, 624 (D.Ariz.1918), aff'd on other grounds, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
George Parrish and Charles Giles v. Perry Johnson, Charles Anderson, K.L. Cole, and Clarence Turner
While Kincaid has been followed on its facts, see Crawford v. Garnier, 719 F.2d 1317, 1324-25 (7th Cir.1983) (per curiam), two decisions evidence a willingness to follow an analytical approach to damages, see Lenard v. Argento, 699 F.2d 874, 888-89 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 464 U.S. 815 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 84 (1983); Owen, 682 F.2d at 657-59 ; see also Freeman v. Franzen, 695 F.2d 485, 494 (7th Cir.1982) (since actual injuries shown no need to consider if damages may be presumed for a violation of substantive due process), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 3553 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Holland v. Breen
See, e.g., Freeman v. Franzen, 695 F.2d 485 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 3553 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Warren
(2×)
See United States v. Bibbs, 564 F.2d 1165, 1167-68 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1007 , 98 S.Ct. 1877 , 56 L.Ed.2d 388 (1978); see also United States v. Harris, 701 F.2d 1095, 1098 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 3554 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983); United States v. Booker, 655 F.2d 562, 563 (4th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Warren
(2×)
See United States v. Bibbs, 564 F.2d 1165, 1167-68 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1007 , 98 S.Ct. 1877 , 56 L.Ed.2d 388 (1978); see also United States v. Harris, 701 F.2d 1095, 1098 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 3554 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983); United States v. Booker, 655 F.2d 562, 563 (4th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Audet v. BD. OF REGENTS FOR ELEM. & SEC. EDUC.
(2×)
The unwelcome embrace of involuntary servitude, however, *433 "occurs when an individual coerces another into his service by improper or wrongful conduct that is intended to cause, and does cause, the other person to believe that he or she has no alternative but to perform the labor." Mussry, 726 F.2d at 1453 ; see also United States v. Harris, 701 F.2d 1095, 1098 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 3554 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Audet v. Board of Regents for Elementary & Secondary Education
(2×)
The unwelcome embrace of involuntary servitude, however, “occurs when an individual coerces another into his service by improper or wrongful conduct that is intended to cause, and does cause, the other person to believe that he or she has no alternative but to perform the labor.” Mussry, 726 F.2d at 1453 ; see also United States v. Harris, 701 F.2d 1095, 1098 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 3554 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John v. Norris v. District of Columbia
(2×)
See, e.g., Freeman v. Franzen, 695 F.2d 485 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 3553 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983); Stringer v. Rowe, 616 F.2d 993 (7th Cir.1980) (per curiam); Aulds v. Foster, 484 F.2d 945 (5th Cir.1973) (per curiam) 8 Thus, even when some force is justified, the Constitution may be offended if the force used grossly exceeds that warranted by the circumstances.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ohio
v.
Liberatore
v.
Liberatore
No. 82-1816.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 1983.
Certio, Ohio, Rari, Summarily, Supreme.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (3)
Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.
Justice O’Connor would grant certio-rari and summarily reverse the judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio.