Pulley v. Harris, 463 U.S. 1248 (1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Pulley v. Harris, 463 U.S. 1248 (1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Manning (la, 2004-10-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Manning
La. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Monroe, 397 So.2d 1258, 1271 (La.1981), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1249 , 104 S.Ct. 36 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1455 (1983), (this Court criticized the "eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" argument as improper but found no reversible error since the argument when considered as a whole lost "much of its objectionable flavor").
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pulley, Warden
v.
Harris
No. 82-1095.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Sep 8, 1983.
463 U.S. 1248
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 460 U. S. 1036.] Motion of National Council on Crime and Delinquency for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted.