green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lovelace
See State v. King, 131 Idaho 374, 376 , 957 P.2d 352, 354 (Ct.App.1998), citing State v. Mitchell, 104 Idaho 493, 498 , 660 P.2d 1336, 1342 (1983), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 934 , 103 S.Ct. 2101 , 77 L.Ed.2d 308 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lewis
See State v. Mitchell, 104 Idaho 493, 501 , 660 P.2d 1336, 1343-44 (1983), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 934 , 103 S.Ct. 2101 , 77 L.Ed.2d 308 (1983) (defendant’s failure to use all peremptory challenges, and thereby exclude unacceptable jurors who exposed entire panel to prejudicial information during voir dire, precludes defendant from claiming error on appeal).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Tate
State v. Maylett, 108 Idaho 671 , 701 P.2d 291 (Ct.App.1985); see State v. Mitchell, 104 Idaho 493 , 660 P.2d 1336 , cert. denied, 461 U.S. 934 , 103 S.Ct. 2101 , 77 L.Ed.2d 308 (1983); State v. Pierce, 107 Idaho 96 , 685 P.2d 837 (Ct.App.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hardman
See State v. Mitchell, 104 Idaho 493, 500 , 660 P.2d 1336, 1343 (1983), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 934 , 103 S.Ct. 2101 , 77 L.Ed.2d 308 (1983) (even where magistrate relied on evidence at preliminary hearing that was ultimately determined to be inadmissible, error was not ground for vacating conviction); compare State v. Wuthrich, 112 Idaho 360 , 732 P.2d *876 329 (Ct.App.1986) (the denial of an accused’s right to counsel at the preliminary hearing may affect the eventual fairness of the trial).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Billie Jo Dotson
(2×)
See United States v. Ward, 696 F.2d 1315, 1319 (CA11), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 934 [ 103 S.Ct. 2101 , 77 L.Ed.2d 308 ] (1983); United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330, 1342-1344 (CA10 1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Shabazz v. Carroll
See United States ex rel McInery v. Shelly, 702 F.2d 101, 102 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 934 , 103 S.Ct. 2102 , 77 L.Ed.2d 309 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Shabazz v. Carroll
See United States ex rel McInery v. Shelly, 702 F.2d 101, 102 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 934 , 103 S.Ct. 2102 , 77 L.Ed.2d 309 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Howell v. State
See, Minneman v. State (1982), Ind., 441 N.E.2d 673, 678 , cert. den. 461 U.S. 933 , 103 S.Ct. 2099 , 77 L.Ed.2d 307 (Prentice, J., and Hunter, J., dissenting on other grounds) (no error where a motion in limine was granted to prohibit defendant from stating that he had taken or would take a polygraph exam).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Maylett
(2×)
See State v. Mitchell, 104 Idaho 493 , 660 P.2d 1336 , cert. denied, 461 U.S. 934 , 103 S.Ct. 2101 , 77 L.Ed.2d 308 (1983); State v. Pierce, 107 Idaho 96, 685 P.2d 887 (Ct.App.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Conway v. Village of Mount Kisco
See United States v. Ward, 696 F.2d 1315 , 1318 n. 2 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 934 , 103 S.Ct. 2101 , 77 L.Ed.2d 308 (1983); Cobb v. Lewis, 488 F.2d 41, 44-46 (5th Cir.1974); Terkildsen v. Waters, 481 F.2d 201, 206 (2d Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Conway v. Village of Mount Kisco, New York
See United States v. Ward, 696 F.2d 1315 , 1318 n. 2 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 934 , 103 S.Ct. 2101 , 77 L.Ed.2d 308 (1983); Cobb v. Lewis, 488 F.2d 41, 44-46 (5th Cir.1974); Terkildsen v. Waters, 481 F.2d 201, 206 (2d Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Powell
See United States v. Ward, 696 F. 2d 1315, 1319 (CA11), cert. denied, 461 U. S. 934 (1983); United States v. Watson, 594 F. 2d 1330, 1342-1344 (CA10 1979). 5 For purposes of our review the Government has conceded that the verdicts are inconsistent. 6 After so stating, the court concluded: “We adhere to our statement in our opinion that there is insufficient evidence to support the convictions on Counts 3, 4, and 5 . . . .” 719 F. 2d, at 1481 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lay v. State
(2×)
See also Minneman v. State (1982), Ind., 441 N.E.2d 673, 678 (trial court properly granted State's motion in limine to prohibit defendant and defendant's witnesses from mentioning willingness of defendant to take a polygraph test), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 933 , 103 S.Ct. 2099 , 77 L.Ed.2d 307 (1983); Helton v. State (1980), 273 Ind. 211, 212-13 , 402 N.E.2d 1263, 1265 (trial court properly excluded evidence that State refused defendant's request to be administered a polygraph test).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Mathews
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Ward, 696 F.2d 1315 (11th Cir.1983) cert. denied 461 U.S. 934 , 103 S.Ct. 2101 , 77 L.Ed.2d 308 ; United States v. Gianni, 678 F.2d 956 (11th Cir.1982) cert. denied 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 ; United States v. Gray, 626 F.2d 494 (5th Cir.1980) cert. denied sub nom.
Harvey
v.
Breeding
v.
Breeding
No. 82-6429.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1983.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.