green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1983 · 2 courts ·
…the sham exception generally involves governmental contacts which are not a genuine attempt to influence official decision making, but instead are merely an attempt to interfere directly with the business relationships of a competitor.
at p. 314
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
First American Title Company Of South Dakota v. South Dakota Land Title Association
the sham exception generally involves governmental contacts which are not a genuine attempt to influence official decision making, but instead are merely an attempt to interfere directly with the business relationships of a competitor.
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
First American Title Co. v. South Dakota Land Title Ass'n
the sham exception generally involves governmental contacts which are not a genuine attempt to influence official decision making, but instead are merely an attempt to interfere directly with the business relationships of a competitor.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Williams v. 5300 Columbia Pike Corp.
See id. at 789 , 66 S.Ct. at 1129 ; Alexander v. National Farmers Org., 687 F.2d 1173, 1181-82 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 937 , 938, 939, 103 S.Ct. 2108 , 2110, 77 L.Ed.2d 313, 314 (1983).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Ex Parte Holt
Supervising the administration of trusts is a well-recognized ground of equity, and the regulation and enforcement of trusts is one of the original and inherent powers of the equity court." Id. at 423 (citations omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
National Ass'n of Radiation Survivors v. Turnage
As the court in Alexander v. National Farmers Org., 687 F.2d 1173 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 937 , 938, 103 S.Ct. 2108 , 2110, 77 L.Ed.2d 313, 314 (1983), observed, [ojbviously, the relevance of and resulting prejudice from destruction of documents cannot be clearly ascertained because the documents no longer exist.
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Deerman
(2×)
See First Alabama Bank of Montgomery, N.A. v. Martin , 425 So.2d 415 , 424 (Ala. 1982), cert. denied , 461 U.S. 938 , 103 S.Ct. 2109 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
National Association of Review Appraisers and Mortgage Underwriters, Inc. v. The Appraisal Foundation the Appraisal Institute American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers Society of Real Estate Appraisers American Society of Appraisers National Society of Real Estate Appraisers, the Appraisal Foundation v. National Association of Real Estate Appraisers, Inc., the Appraisal Foundation v. National Association of Real Estate Appraisers, Inc., National Association of Real Estate Appraisers, Inc., Counter-Plaintiff/appellant v. The Appraisal Foundation the Appraisal Institute American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers Society of Real Estate Appraisers American Society of Appraisers National Society of Real Estate Appraisers, Counter-Defendants/appellees. National Association of Review Appraisers and Mortgage Underwriters, Inc. National Association of Real Estate Appraisers, Inc. v. Roy Morris, National Association of Review Appraisers and Mortgage Underwriters, Inc. National Association of Real Estate Appraisers, Inc. v. Roy G. Green George Hamilton Jones, National Association of Review Appraisers and Mortgage Underwriters, Inc. National Association of Real Estate Appraisers, Inc. v. Joseph S. Durant
See Alexander v. National Farmers Org., 687 F.2d 1173, 1210 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 937 , 938, 939, 103 S.Ct. 2108 , 2110, 77 L.Ed.2d 313, 314 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
National Ass'n of Review Appraisers & Mortgage Underwriters, Inc. v. Appraisal Foundation
See Alexander v. National Farmers Org., 687 F.2d 1173, 1210 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 937 , 938, 939, 103 S.Ct. 2108 , 2110, 77 L.Ed.2d 313, 314 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Battocchi v. Washington Hospital Center
See Alexander v. Nat’l Farmers Org., 687 F.2d 1173, 1205-06 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 937 , 103 S.Ct. 2108 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Illinois Bell Telephone Company v. Federal Communications Commission
(2×)
See Computer & Communications Industry Ass'n v. FCC, 693 F.2d 198 (D.C.Cir.1982) (affirming Computer II ), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 938 , 103 S.Ct. 2109 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 ; Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. FCC, 740 F.2d 465 (7th Cir.1984) (affirming BOC Separate Subsidiary Order ); North American Telecommunications Ass'n v. FCC, 772 F.2d 1282 (7th Cir.1985) (affirming BOC Separate Subsidiary Reconsideration ). 18 Soon after "modified" separation requirements were imposed on the divested BOCs, a number of the BOCs, including Ameritech, petitioned the Commission to allow their CPE subsidiaries to mar…
discussed
Cited "see"
Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications Commission
(2×)
See Computer & Communications Industry Ass’n v. FCC, 693 F.2d 198 (D.C.Cir.1982) (affirming Computer II), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 938 , 103 S.Ct. 2109 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 ; Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. FCC, 740 F.2d 465 (7th Cir.1984) (affirming BOC Separate Subsidiary Order), North American Telecommunications Ass’n v. FCC, 772 F.2d 1282 (7th Cir.1985) (affirming BOC Separate Subsidiary Reconsideration ).
cited
Cited "see"
Synanon Church v. United States
See Alexander v. National Farmers Organization, 687 F.2d 1173, 1205 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 937 , 103 S.Ct. 2108 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Ronald S. Monroe v. Frank Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Angola, Respondent
See French v. Estelle, 696 F.2d 318 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 937 , 103 S.Ct. 2108 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
New York State Commission On Cable Television v. Federal Communications Commission
(2×)
See Computer and Communications Industry Ass'n v. FCC, 693 F.2d 198, 217 (D.C.Cir.1982) (refusing to engage in a debate about the wisdom of relying on market forces, given that that choice of policy was within the statutory mandate and not arbitrary or capricious), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 938 , 103 S.Ct. 2109 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983). 13 D.
discussed
Cited "see"
New York State Commission on Cable Television v. Federal Communications Commission
(2×)
See Computer and Communications Industry Ass’n v. FCC, 693 F.2d 198, 217 (D.C.Cir.1982) (refusing to engage in a debate about the wisdom of relying on market forces, given that that choice of policy was within the statutory mandate and not arbitrary or capricious), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 938 , 103 S.Ct. 2109 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983). 13 D.- Procedural Objections .
cited
Cited "see"
Lawrence John Stokes v. Raymond K. Procunier, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
See French v. Estelle, 692 F.2d 1021 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 937 , 103 S.Ct. 2108 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Virginia State Corp. Commission v. Federal Communications Commission
(2×)
See Computer and Communications Industry Ass'n v. F.C.C., 693 F.2d 198 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 2109 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983); New York Telephone Co. v. F.C.C., 631 F.2d 1059 (2nd Cir.1980); and Puerto Rico Telephone Co. v. F.C.C., 553 F.2d 694 (1st Cir. 1977), discussed in text infra. Contra Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Arkansas Public Service Comm’n, 584 F.Supp. 1087 (D.C.Ark.1984) (Court holds that FCC lacked jurisdiction to issue the January 6, 1983 Order and refuses to enforce it as ultra vires). . 47 U.S.C. § 151 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Trade Commission v. Verity International, Ltd.
(2×)
See, e.g., Computer & Comm. Ind. Ass’n v. FCC, 693 F.2d 198 , 209 n. 59 (D.C.Cir.1982) (using term "common carrier” to "indicate not an entity but rather an activity as to which an entity is a common carrier”), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 938 , 103 S.Ct. 2109 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983); Nat’l Ass’n of Regulatory Util.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pesce v. General Motors Corp.
Co., 15 F.3d 546, 552-553 (6th Cir.1994) (quoting Welsh v. United States, 844 F.2d 1239, 1246 (6th Cir.1988)); see also Alexander v. National Farmers Org., 687 F.2d 1173, 1205-06 (8th Cir.1982) (severe sanction of dismissal would have been proper given outrageous destruction of documents, but not abuse of discretion to fail to do so), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 937 , 103 S.Ct. 2108 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983); In re Grace Line Inc., 517 F.2d 404 , 409 (2d Cir.1975) (no negative inference may be drawn from failure to produce evidence absent showing of control at the time of disappearance or trial).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Adams v. Robertson
(2×)
See e.g., First Alabama Bank of Montgomery, N.A. v. Martin, 425 So.2d 415 (Ala.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 938 [ 103 S.Ct. 2109 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 ] (1983); Penson v. Terminal Transport Company, 634 F.2d 989 (5th Cir. 1981); Nottingham Partners v. Dana, 564 A.2d 1089 (Del.1989); Kincade v. General Tire & Rubber Co., 635 F.2d 501, 502-08 (5th Cir.1981); Nottingham Partners v. Trans-Lux Corp., 925 F.2d 29, 31-32 (1st Cir.1991); Robinson v. Lorrilard [Lorillard] Corp., 444 F.2d 791 (4th Cir.1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. Washington Hospital Center
(2×)
Id. at 766 ; see also Alexander v. National Farmers Org., 687 F.2d 1173, 1205-06 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 937 , 103 S.Ct. 2108 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983); Washington Gas Light Co. v. Biancaniello, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 164, 167 , 183 F.2d 982, 985 (1950).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Telectron, Inc. v. Overhead Door Corp.
See, e.g., Alexander v. National Farmers Organization, 687 F.2d 1173, 1205-06 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 937 , 103 S.Ct. 2108 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Western Union International, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
(2×)
See, e.g., Computer & Communications Industry Association v. FCC, 693 F.2d 198, 212 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 938 , 103 S.Ct. 2109 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ernest Daniels v. Frank Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and William Guste, Jr., Attorney General, State of Louisiana
See, e.g., French v. Estelle, 696 F.2d 318, 319-20 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 937 , 103 S.Ct. 2108 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
New England Telephone and Telegraph Company, Etc. v. Public Utilities Commission of Maine
(2×)
See, e.g., Computer & Communications Industry Association v. FCC, 693 F.2d 198, 214-18 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 938 , 103 S.Ct. 2109 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983); North Carolina Utilities Commission v. FCC, 537 F.2d 787 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1027 , 97 S.Ct. 651 , 50 L.Ed.2d 631 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. v. Aspen Skiing Co.
In Perkins v. Standard Oil Co., 399 U.S. 222 , 90 S.Ct. 1989 , 26 L.Ed.2d 534 (1970), the Supreme Court held that § 4 of the Clayton Act “authorize[s] the award of counsel fees for legal services performed at the appellate stages of a successfully prosecuted private antitrust action.” Id. at 223, 90 S.Ct. at 1990 ; see also Alexander v. National Farmers Organization, 696 F.2d 1210, 1211-12 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. -, -, 103 S.Ct. 2108 , 2110, 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983); Moore v. Jas.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aspen Highlands Skiing Corporation v. Aspen Skiing Company
Sec. 15 (a). 58 In Perkins v. Standard Oil Co., 399 U.S. 222 , 90 S.Ct. 1989 , 26 L.Ed.2d 534 (1970), the Supreme Court held that Sec. 4 of the Clayton Act "authorize[s] the award of counsel fees for legal services performed at the appellate stages of a successfully prosecuted private antitrust action." Id. at 223 , 90 S.Ct. at 1990 ; see also Alexander v. National Farmers Organization, 696 F.2d 1210, 1211-12 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, ----, 103 S.Ct. 2108 , 2110, 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983); Moore v. Jas.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
First Alabama Bank of Montgomery, N.A.
v.
Martin
v.
Martin
No. 82-1571.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1983.
Cited by 140 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Ala. Motion of American Bankers Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.