green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gallego
See United States v. Henderson, 535 F.Supp. 677 (N.D.N.Y.1982), rev’d on other grounds, 698 F.2d 589 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 835 , 104 S.Ct. 120 , 78 L.Ed.2d 118 (1983) (Double Jeopardy Clause barred subsequent prosecution for felony murder after the defendant’s conviction of attempted robbery). 3 In an effort to avoid this conclusion, the government advances a novel theory.
discussed
Cited "see"
Shirley Mello Rodriques v. Joseph Furtado
See Salinas v. Breier, 695 F.2d 1073, 1085 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 835 , 104 S.Ct. 119 , 78 L.Ed.2d 118 (1983) (Fourth Amendment does not prohibit police officers “with probable cause to believe that a controlled substance is hidden in a person’s rectum or vagina, without first obtaining a warrant and without obtaining the services of a doctor under sanitary conditions, to require the person, without the use of force, to bend forward deeply at the waist so as to expose her rectum and vagina to visual inspection.”); Security & Law Enforcement Employees, Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
Towles v. United States
Accord semble, Paul v. Henderson, 698 F.2d 589, 592 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 120 , 78 L.Ed.2d 118 (1983); United States v. Herzog, 644 F.2d 713, 716 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1018 , 101 S.Ct. 3008 , 69 L.Ed.2d 390 (1981); United States v. Buonomo, 441 F.2d 922, 924-25 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 845 , 92 S.Ct. 146 , 30 L.Ed.2d 81 (1971). .
cited
Cited "see"
Stepney v. Lopes
See Paul v. Henderson, 698 F.2d 589 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 120 , 78 L.Ed.2d 118 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Belcher
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has repeatedly held that ‘[t]he constitutional immunity from double jeopardy is a personal right which, if not affirmatively pleaded by the defendant at the time of trial, will be regarded as waived.’ United States v. Perez, 565 F.2d 1227, 1232 (2d Cir. 1977); see also Paul v. Henderson, 698 F.2d 589, 592 (2d Cir.) [cert. denied, 464 U.S. 835 , 104 S. Ct. 120 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Talkington
See, e.g., Salinas v. Breier, 695 F.2d 1073, 1077 (7th Cir.1982) (“At trial much confusion existed even among highranking officers as to the definitions of 'strip search’ and ‘body cavity search.’ ”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 835 , 104 S.Ct. 119 , 78 L.Ed.2d 118 (1983); Security & Law Enforcement Employees v. Carey, 737 F.2d 187, 192 (2d Cir.1984) (“The district court used the term ‘strip frisk search’ to describe a search including a visual examination of the anal and genital areas of the person searched.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
O'Dillon
v.
Zant, Warden
v.
Zant, Warden
No. 82-6756.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1983.
Published
Super. Ct. Ga., Butts County. Certiorari denied.