green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Robert G. Penrod v. State of California
Moss v. Craven, 427 F.2d 139, 140 (9th Cir.1970); but see United States v. Freed, 703 F.2d 394, 395 (9th Cir.) ("This circuit has applied Boykin retroactively.") (citing United States v. Goodheim, 651 F.2d 1294 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 839 (1983)).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Blann
See United States v. Anderson, 704 F.2d 117, 119 (3d Cir.) (declining to establish a supervisory rule), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 838 , 104 S.Ct. 129 , 78 L.Ed.2d 125 (1983); United States v. Lilly, 536 F. 3d 190, 198 (3d Cir.2008) (entrusting to district judges the determination to fashion waiver colloquies in the way they see fit).
cited
Cited "see"
Prophet v. United States
See Reed v. United States, 452 A.2d 1173, 1180-81 (D.C.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 839 , 104 S.Ct. 132 , 78 L.Ed.2d 127 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Kane v. Ryan
See Reed v. United States, 452 A.2d 1173, 1176 (D.C.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 839 , 104 S.Ct. 132 , 78 L,Ed.2d 127 (1983); Jackson v. District of Columbia, 200 A.2d 199, 201 (D.C.1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
Deneal v. United States
(2×)
See Reed v. United States, 452 A.2d 1173, 1178 (D.C.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 839 , 104 S.Ct. 132 , 78 L.Ed.2d 127 (1983); Mitchell v. United States, 408 A.2d 1213, 1215 (D.C.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mercer v. United States
See, e.g., Reed v. United States, 452 A.2d 1173, 1179 (D.C.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 839 , 104 S.Ct. 132 , 78 L.Ed.2d 127 (1983); United States v. Mobile Materials, Inc., 881 F.2d 866, 875-76 (10th Cir.1989); United States v. Koppers Co., 652 F.2d 290, 299 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 617 (1981); United States v. Hasenstab, 575 F.2d 1035, 1040 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 827 , 99 S.Ct. 100 , 58 L.Ed.2d 120 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Calvin L. Robinson
See, e.g., United States v. Freed, 703 F.2d 394, 395 (9th Cir) cert. denied 464 U.S. 839 (1983) (testimony of district attorney and defense counsel that trial judge "consistently followed a practice of painstakingly probing a defendant's understanding of the consequences and meaning of a guilty plea" was sufficient); United States v. Goodheim, 686 F.2d 776, 777-78 (9th Cir.1982) (evidence of both the trial court and former defense attorney's practice with regard to guilty pleas and signed jury waiver sufficient).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Curl v. Superior Court
(2×)
NOTES [1] Evidence Code section 1105 provides: "Any otherwise admissible evidence of habit or custom is admissible to prove conduct on a specified occasion in conformity with the habit or custom." (Cf. In re Tucker (1966) 64 Cal.2d 15, 18 [ 48 Cal. Rptr. 697 , 409 P.2d 921 ] [clerk's affidavit concerning custom and practice of deceased judge relevant and admissible to establish that defendant had been advised of his right to court-appointed counsel prior to entry of guilty plea]; In re Luce (1966) 64 Cal.2d 11, 13-14 [ 48 Cal. Rptr. 694 , 409 P.2d 918 ] [trial judge's affidavit of his "univers…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Erwin Darrell Newman
See, e.g., United States v. Freed, 703 F.2d 394, 395 (9th Cir.) (considering evidence of the trial court's plea-taking practice and of counsel’s practice in advising clients), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 839 , 104 S.Ct. 131 , 78 L.Ed.2d 126 (1983); Goodheim, 686 F.2d at 777-78 (evidence of trial judge’s practice). 3 Finally, we must decide what quantum of proof should be used for factual determinations.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lee
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-6873.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1983.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.