green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
11.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1991 ·
…a persistent, unreasonable demand for dismissal of counsel and appointment of new counsel ... is the functional equivalent of a knowing and voluntary waiver of counsel
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Russell A. Tinsley v. Bob Borg
E.g., Leonard v. United States, 378 U.S. 544, 544-45 , 84 S.Ct. 1696 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1964) (per curiam); Willie v. Maggio, 737 F.2d 1372, 1379-81 (5th Cir.) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1002 , 105 S.Ct. 415 , 83 L.Ed.2d 342 (1984); but see United States v. Jones, 707 F.2d 1169, 1173 (10th Cir.) (refusing to find a sixth amendment violation where a jury foreman knew defendant as child and allegedly made false accusations against him), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 859 , 104 S.Ct. 184 , 78 L.Ed.2d 163 (1983).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Eddie Milton Garey, Jr., A.K.A. Miles Garey, A.K.A. Milton Garey, A.K.A. Eddie Garey
(2×)
a persistent, unreasonable demand for dismissal of counsel and appointment of new counsel . . . is the functional equivalent of a knowing and voluntary waiver of counsel.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State of Tennessee v. Tony v. Carruthers And James Montgomery
a persistent, unreasonable demand for dismissal of counsel and appointment of new counsel . . . is the functional equivalent of a knowing and voluntary waiver of cou nsel
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Frank Lee Marshall v. Richard L. Dugger
(2×)
a persistent, unreasonable demand for dismissal of counsel and appointment of new counsel ... is the functional equivalent of a knowing and voluntary waiver of counsel
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Brown
United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117 (1st Cir.1978); United States v. Lee, 916 F.2d 814 (2d Cir.1990); United States v. Rickus, 351 F.Supp. 1379 (E.D.Pa.1972); United States v. Washington, 677 F.2d 394 (4th Cir.1982); United States v. Berd, 634 F.2d 979 (5th Cir.1981); United States v. Rem, 984 F.2d 806, 810-811 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 300 , 126 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993); United States v. Morales, 737 F.2d 761 (8th Cir.1984); United States v. Veatch, 674 F.2d 1217 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 946 , 102 S.Ct. 2013 , 72 L.Ed.2d 469 (1982); United States v. Jones, 707…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edwards
See Segars, 31 F.3d at 658 (quoting United States v. Jones, 707 F.2d 1169, 1172 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 859 , 104 S.Ct. 184 , 78 L.Ed.2d 163 (1983)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dimick
See United States v. Jones, 707 F.2d 1169, 1172 (10th Cir.), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 859 , 104 S.Ct. 184 , 78 L.Ed.2d 163 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Browne v. Robb
See United States v. Jones, 707 F.2d 1169 (10th Cir.) cert. denied [ 464 U.S. 859 ], 104 S.Ct. 184 [ 78 L.Ed.2d 163 ] (1983). (10) In this case, the trial court’s finding that Vick relinquished any reasonable expectation of privacy in his shoulder bag when he left it in the car and fled is supported by the record.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Castillo
See United States v. Moore, 706 F.2d 538 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 859 , 104 S.Ct. 183 , 78 L.Ed.2d 163 (1983); McKee v. Harris.
cited
Cited "see"
James Harding v. Leoneal Davis
See United States v. Moore, 706 F.2d 538, 540 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 859 , 104 S.Ct. 183 , 78 L.Ed.2d 163 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carrasquillo
See United States v. Jones, 707 F.2d 1169, 1172-73 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 859 , 104 S.Ct. 184 , 78 L.Ed.2d 163 (1983) (Repeated disavowals of any knowledge of the satchel indicate a clear intent to relinquish an expectation of privacy and abandon the satchel.).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerena
See United States v. Jones, 707 F.2d 1169, 1172 (10th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 859 , 104 S.Ct. 184 , 78 L.Ed.2d 163 (1983) ("[w]hen individuals voluntarily abandon property, they forfeit any expectation of privacy in it they may have had”); United States v. Compton, 704 F.2d 739, 741 (5th Cir.1983) (defendant found to lack "standing to contest the seizure of the drugs from the trash, having abandoned the bag”); United States v. Burnette, 698 F.2d 1038, 1047 (9th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 461 U.S. 936 , 103 S.Ct. 2106 , 77 L.Ed.2d 312 (1983) ("[o]ne who has voluntarily abandoned p…
cited
Cited "see"
Wayne E. Ritter v. Fred Smith, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections and J.D. White, Warden, Holman Unit
See Hall v. Alabama, 700 F.2d 1333 (11th Cir.) (entertaining a state’s Rule 60(b)(6) motion in a habeas corpus proceeding), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 859 , 104 S.Ct. 183 , 78 L.Ed.2d 163 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wiser v. People
(2×)
See United States v. Jones, 707 F.2d 1169 (10th Cir.) (something more than unverified conjecture is necessary to justify a new trial on the ground of juror misconduct where only potentially suspicious circumstances are shown), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 859 , 104 S.Ct. 184 , 78 L.Ed.2d 163 (1983); United States v. Mares, 383 F.2d 811 (10th Cir.1967) (mere showing of possibility of prejudice is insufficient to warrant a new trial), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 961 , 88 S.Ct. 1060 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1157 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lloyd Ray Bradshaw
See United States v. McKinney, 429 F.2d 1019, 1031 (5th Cir.1970) (Godbold, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 922 , 91 S.Ct. 910 , 27 L.Ed.2d 825 (1971). [Footnote omitted.] We cited Hendrix with approval in United States v. Jones, 707 F.2d 1169 (10th Cir,), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 859 , 104 S.Ct. 184 , 78 L.Ed.2d 163 (1983): A trial court has a great responsibility and wide discretion in dealing with a motion for a new trial based on allegations of juror misconduct.
discussed
Cited "see"
Daniel Morris Thomas v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Dept. Of Corrections, Respondent
See United States v. Moore, 706 F.2d 538, 540 (5th Cir.1983) (finding “a persistent, unreasonable demand for dismissal of counsel [to be] the functional equivalent of a knowing and voluntary waiver of counsel”), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 183 , 78 L.Ed.2d 163 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Raymond H. McDonald A/K/A Play, A/K/A Randolph Smith
See, e.g., United States v. Jones, 707 F.2d 1169, 1172 (10th Cir.) (“When individuals voluntarily abandon property, they forfeit any expectation of privacy in it that they might have had.”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 859 , 104 S.Ct. 184 , 78 L.Ed.2d 163 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Maria L. Sayan
See, e.g., United States v. Moore, 706 F.2d 538, 540 (5th Cir.) (persistent, unreasonable demand for dismissal of counsel and appointment of new counsel is functional equivalent of knowing and voluntary waiver of counsel), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 859 , 104 S.Ct. 183 , 78 L.Ed.2d 163 (1983). 16 H.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patrick M. Reilley
See, e.g., United States v. Moore, 706 F.2d 538, 540 (5th Cir.) (“sixth amendment right to counsel [is] echoed in Rule 44”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 859 , 104 S.Ct. 183 , 78 L.Ed.2d 163 (1983); United States v. Posey, 665 F.Supp. 848, 851 (C.D.Cal.1987) (Rule 44(a) “restates the defendant’s constitutional right of counsel in criminal proceedings as defined by judicial interpretations of the sixth amendment”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rodney Lee Morgan
(2×)
See also United States v. Jones, 707 F.2d 1169, 1172 (10th Cir.) ("[A] warrantless search or seizure of abandoned property is not unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment."), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 859 , 104 S.Ct. 184 , 78 L.Ed.2d 163 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Blount v. State
See also Hall v. Alabama , 700 F.2d 1333 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 859 , 104 S.Ct. 183 , 78 L.Ed.2d 163 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lawrence Sarsoun
(2×)
See also United States v. Moore, 706 F.2d 538 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 859 , 104 S.Ct. 183 , 78 L.Ed.2d 163 (1983) (persistent, unreasonable demand for appointment of new counsel is functional equivalent of knowing and voluntary waiver of counsel); United States v. Gipson, 693 F.2d 109 (10th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1216 , 103 S.Ct. 1218 , 75 L.Ed.2d 455 (1983) (defendant’s delaying tactics of unreasonably refusing competent counsel could constitute waiver of counsel); United States v. Romero, 640 F.2d 1014 (9th Cir.1981) (defendant tax protestor attempted to create error…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. DiNorscio
United States v. Armstrong, 654 F.2d 1328, 1332-33 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1157 , 102 S.Ct. 1032 , 71 L.Ed.2d 315 (1982); see also United States v. Jones, 707 F.2d 1169, 1173 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 859 , 104 S.Ct. 184 , 78 L.Ed.2d 163 (1983); United States v. Hendrix, 549 F.2d 1225, 1227-28 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 818 , 98 S.Ct. 58 , 54 L.Ed.2d 74 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Mabry, Debra Mabry, and Roger Sanders
(2×)
Compare, United States v. Jones, 707 F.2d 1169 (10th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 859 , 104 S.Ct. 184 , 78 L.Ed.2d 163 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hall
v.
Alabama
v.
Alabama
No. 83-5167.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (4) · Court of Criminal Appeals of T… (1)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari
denied.