green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.7 score
“it is essential ... that damages reflect only the losses directly attributable to unlawful competition”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 42 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States Football League v. National Football League
it is essential ... that damages reflect only the losses directly attributable to unlawful competition
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Southern Pacific Communications Company v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company
the mci case
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
TARABISHI v. McALESTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL
Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 1132-33 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 [ 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 ] (1983), the court held that to establish liability under the doctrine, the plaintiff must show: "(1) control of the essential facility by a monopolist; (2) a competitor's inability practically or reasonably to duplicate the facility; (3) the denial of the use of the essential facility to a competitor; and (4) the feasibility of providing the facility." Id. at 369 (citations omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Tarabishi v. McAlester Regional Hospital
Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 1132-33 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 [ 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 ] (1983), the court held that to establish liability under the doctrine, the plaintiff must show: “(1) control of the essential facility by a monopolist; (2) a competitor’s inability practically or reasonably to duplicate the facility; (3) the denial of the use of the essential facility to a competitor; and (4) the feasibility of providing the facility.” Id. at 369 (citations omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
Moore v. U.S. Postal Service
See MCI Communications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 1166 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983); Brom v. Bozell, Jacobs, Kenyon & Eckhardt, Inc., 867 F. Supp. 686, 689 (N.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Spirit Airlines, Inc. v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
See MCI Communications Corp. v. AT & T Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 1114 (7th Cir.) (holding that imposing a profit-maximization rule as the standard for liability “would tend to freeze the prices of dominant firms at their monopoly levels and would prevent many pro-competitive price cuts beneficial to consumers”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Spirit Airlines, Inc. v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
See MCI Communications Corp. v. AT & T Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 1114 (7th Cir.) (holding that imposing a profit-maximization rule as the standard for liability "would tend to freeze the prices of dominant firms at their monopoly levels and would prevent many pro-competitive price cuts beneficial to consumers"), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Telecomm Technical Services, Inc. v. Siemens Rolm Communications, Inc.
See MCI Communications Corp. v. AT & T Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 1161 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County v. United States
See MCI Communications v. AT & T, 708 F.2d 1081, 1111 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983); Miller v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 352 , 620 F.2d 812, 837 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.
See, MCI Communications v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 1155 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983) (footnote omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
Laurel Sand & Gravel, Inc. Maryland Midland Railway, Inc. v. Csx Transportation, Inc.
See MCI Communications v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 1132-33 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Illinois Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.
See, MCI Communications Corp. v. AT & T Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 1106 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Air Crash Disaster at Stapleton International Airport
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See MCI Communications v. American Telephone & Telegraph, 708 F.2d 1081, 1173 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Laurel Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
See MCI Communications v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 1132-33 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Duffitt v. State
(2×)
See U.S. v. Walker (4th Cir.1982), 696 F.2d 277 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Oahu Gas Service, Inc. v. Pacific Resources Inc., Gasco, Inc.
See MCI Communications Corp. v.AT & T Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 1132 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983) (plaintiff must show control of the essential facility by a monopolist).
discussed
Cited "see"
G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See MCI Communications v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, 708 F.2d 1081, 1155 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983). 25 81.
discussed
Cited "see"
Oahu Gas Service, Inc. v. Pacific Resources Inc., Gasco, Inc.
See MCI Communications Corp. v. AT&T Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 1132 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983) (plaintiff must show control of the essential facility by a monopolist).
discussed
Cited "see"
Consol. Gas Co. of Fla. v. City Gas Co. of Fla.
However, “[r]eliance on statistical market share is a questionable approach in cases involving regulated industries____ A predominant market share may merely be the result of regulation, and regulatory control may preclude the exercise of monopoly power.” Southern Pacific Communications Co. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 740 F.2d 980, 1000 (D.C.Cir.1984), cer t. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 380 (1985); see MCI Communications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 1106-07 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d …
discussed
Cited "see"
Valley Liquors, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Renfield Importers, Ltd.
“Bad faith” is defined as “generally implying or involving actual or constructive fraud, or a design to mislead or deceive another, or a neglect or refusal to fulfill some duty or some contractual obligation, not prompted by an honest mistake as to one’s rights or duties, but by some interested or sinister motive.” Black’s Law Dictionary 127 (5th ed. 1979); see MCI Communications Corp. v. American Telegraph & Telephone Co., 708 F.2d 1081 , 1159 n. 116 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marvin L. Fishman and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz, and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz
(2×)
See MCI Communications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 1113 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Isaksen v. Vermont Castings, Inc.
See, generally, MCI Communications v. AT & T, 708 F.2d 1081, 1160-69 (7th Cir.1983), cert. den., 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ball Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Mutual Hospital Insurance, Inc.
See MCI Communications Corp. v. AT&T, 708 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983), which holds that a dominant firm may slash prices to marginal cost in an effort to capture patronage.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ball Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Mutual Hospital Insurance
See MCI Communications Corp. v. AT&T, 708 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983), which holds that a dominant firm may slash prices to marginal cost in an effort to capture patronage.
discussed
Cited "see"
American Trucking Association, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission
(2×)
See MCI Communications v. AT & T, 708 F.2d 1081, 1111 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983).
examined
Cited "see"
Southern Pacific Communications Co. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co.
(6×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See MCI Communications Corp. v. AT & T, 708 F.2d 1081, 1106-07 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983); Watson & Brunner, Monopolization by Regulated “Monopolies”: The Search for Substantive Standards, 22 Antitrust Bull. 559, 565-68 (1977). *1001 The District Court’s analysis of monopoly power in the present case is consistent with the above principles.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Reserve Realty, LLC v. Windemere Reserve, LLC
See, e.g., MCI Communications Corp. v. Ameri- can Telephone & Telegraph Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 1132 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S. Ct. 234 , 78 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Reserve Realty, LLC v. Windemere Reserve, LLC
See, e.g., MCI Communications Corp. v. Ameri- can Telephone & Telegraph Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 1132 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S. Ct. 234 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anserphone, Inc. v. Bell Atlantic Corp.
See also Advanced, Health-Care Services v. Radford Community Hospital, 910 F.2d 139 , 150 (4th Cir.1990) (citing MCI Communications v. American Telephone & Telegraph, 708 F.2d 1081, 1132-33 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tabas v. Tabas
At bottom, Duquesne Light reaffirms that “the litigants in a particular case do not own the court.” Id; see also MCI Communications Corp. v. AT & T, 708 F.2d 1081, 1171 (7th Cir.) (“Litigants are not entitled to burden the court with an unending stream of cumulative evidence.”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Aluminum Phosphide Antitrust Litigation
See, e.g., Amerinet, 972 F.2d at 1494 (once causation of damages established amount of damages may be determined by just and reasonable estimate) (quoting MCI Communications Corp. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 1161 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Amerinet, Inc. v. Xerox Corp.
See also MCI Communications Corp. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 1161 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983); Rosebrough, 666 F.2d at 1146 ; R.S.E., Inc. v. Pennsy Supply, Inc., 523 F.Supp. 954, 963 (M.D.Pa.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Amerinet, Inc. v. Xerox Corporation
See also MCI Communications Corp. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 1161 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983); Rosebrough, 666 F.2d at 1146 ; R.S.E., Inc. v. Pennsy Supply, Inc., 523 F.Supp. 954, 963 (M.D.Pa.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Warner Communications Securities Litigation
Pfizer, 314 F.Supp. at 743-44 ; see, e.g., MCI Communications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 1166-69 (7th Cir.) ($1.8 billion antitrust judgment was remanded for a new trial and the second trial produced a dramatically smaller award), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983); Telex Corp. v. International Business Machines Corp., 510 F.2d 894, 933 (10th Cir.) (per curiam) (reversed a $259.5 million judgment for plaintiff and awarded an $18.5 million counterclaim judgment for defendant), cert. dismissed, 423 U.S. 802 , 96 S.Ct. 8 , 46 L.Ed.2…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Monfort of Colorado, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc. And Excel Corporation
See, e.g., MCI Communications v. AT & T, 708 F.2d 1081, 1112-13 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983) (recognizing potential violation based on predatory pricing but finding insufficient evidence in case under consideration); William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. ITT Continental Baking Co., 668 F.2d 1014, 1031-38 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 825 , 103 S.Ct. 58 , 74 L.Ed.2d 61 (1982) (establishing rules for predatory pricing cases).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shannon v. State
See also Jones v. State, 429 So.2d 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), review denied, — U.S.—, 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983); Allen v. State, 424 So.2d 101 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), rev. denied, 436 So.2d 97 (Fla.1983); Holley v. State, 423 So.2d 562 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Racetrac Petroleum, Inc. v. Prince George's County
Compare MCI v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 1159-60 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (defendant’s FCC filings protected by Noerr-Pennington but other activities not aimed at influencing governmental action not protected) with Scott v. City of Sioux City, Trade Cas.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jack Faucett Associates, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co.
Phonetele, Inc. v. AT & T, 664 F.2d 716 , 737-38 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1145 , 103 S.Ct. 785 , 74 L.Ed.2d 992 (1983); see also MCI Communications v. AT & T, 708 F.2d 1081, 1109-10 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aspen Highlands Skiing Corporation v. Aspen Skiing Company
(2×)
"There exist two conceptually similar lines of cases which impose a duty to deal upon a monopolist." Id. at 855 ; see also MCI Communications v. AT & T, 708 F.2d 1081, 1148 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983). 12 First, there is the so-called essential facilities or bottleneck doctrine.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. v. Aspen Skiing Co.
(2×)
“There exist two conceptually similar lines of cases which impose a duty to deal upon a monopolist.” Id. at 855 ; see also MCI Communications v. AT & T, 708 F.2d 1081, 1148 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983). 12 First, there is the so-called essential facilities or bottleneck doctrine.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Manglitz
See, e.g., United States v. Walker, 696 F.2d 277, 280-81 (4th Cir. 1982), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983); United States v. Murphy, 696 F.2d 282, 283-84 (4th Cir. 1982), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 2124 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983); United States v. Garner, 574 F.2d 1141, 1143-44 (4th Cir.), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 333 , 58 L.Ed.2d 333 (1978); United States v. West, 574 F.2d 1131, 1134-38 (4th Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Cleveland v. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company
(2×)
See also, e.g., MCI Communications v. AT & T, 708 F.2d 1081, 1103 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983); IT & T v. Gen.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Holloway
v.
Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
v.
Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
No. 82-6749.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (1) · S.D. New York (1)
Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.