green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Amigo Gift Ass'n v. Executive Properties, Ltd.
See Board of Regents v. N.C.A.A., 546 F.Supp. 1276, 1326 (W.D.Okla.1982), modified, 707 F.2d 1147 (10th Cir.1983), cert. granted, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 272 , 78 L.Ed.2d 253 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League, an Unincorporated Association, Defendants/cross-Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees, and New England Patriots Football Club, Inc., Highwood Service, Inc., Empire Sports, Inc., Houston Oilers, Inc., New York Jets Football Club, Inc., and Chargers Football Company, Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc., and Miami Dolphins, Ltd., Defendants/cross-Defendants-Appellants, and Los Angeles Rams Football Co., Defendant/cross-Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee, and Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum, Inc., Intervenor/defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Oakland Raiders, Ltd., Cross-Claimant-Appellee/cross-Appellant
See Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma v. N.C.A.A., 707 F.2d 1147 (10th Cir.1983) cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 272 , 78 L.Ed.2d 253 (1983). 150 To elevate formal corporate characteristics of ongoing economic entities above the substance of what purpose and function the structure serves, and what product(s) emerge from the process would not only destroy the N.F.L., professional sports leagues, and the goodwill that results from continuity in national allocation of the sport throughout the country, but would create a rule of law casting all franchise/wholesale distribution…
cited
Cited "see"
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League
See Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma v. N.C.A.A., 707 F.2d 1147 (10th Cir.1983) cert, granted, - U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 272 , 78 L.Ed.2d 253 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Justice v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n
See Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma v. NCAA, 546 F.Supp. 1276, 1291-92 (W.D.Okl.1982), aff'd in part, 707 F.2d 1147 (10th Cir.1983), cert, granted, — U.S.—, 104 S.Ct. 272 , 78 L.Ed.2d 253 (1983). c.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Evanston Ins. Co., Inc. v. Merin
See, e.g., Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. Oregon-Washington Carpenters Employees Pension Trust Fund, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 271 , 78 L.Ed.2d 253 (1984) (statute requiring employers who had withdrawn from Multiemployer Pension Fund in past to pay withdrawal liability fee).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Washington Star Company v. International Typographical Union Negotiated Pension Plan
Compare Shelter Framing Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 705 F.2d 1502, 1511 (9th Cir.) ("The law here operates to the severe detriment of the employers, and we believe their reliance on the prior law to be the most relevant reliance interest to be considered."), prob. juris. noted, - U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 271 , 78 L.Ed.2d 253 (1983), with Republic Industries, Inc. v. Teamsters Joint Council No. 83 of Virginia Pension Fund, 718 F.2d 628, 638 (4th Cir.1983) ("We have no doubt of the heavy weight to be given to employees’ reliance on ultimate realization of their vested benefits.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kirby Forest Industries, Inc.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-1994.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 17, 1983.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.