green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.6 score
“he fairness of the trial and not the culpability of the prosecutor is the standard for analyzing the constitutional due process claims of criminal defendants alleging prosecutorial misconduct”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Burton
he fairness of the trial and not the culpability of the prosecutor is the standard for analyzing the constitutional due process claims of criminal defendants alleging prosecutorial misconduct
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Williams
See State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 563 , 462 A.2d 1001 (‘‘[w]e have often held that a prompt cautionary instruction to the jury regarding improper prosecutorial remarks obviates any possible harm to the defendant’’), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Santiago
(2×)
See State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 575 , 462 A.2d 1001 (“[w]here a prosecutor in argument interjects remarks deliberately intended to undermine the rulings of the trial court to the prejudice of the defendant, his conduct is so offensive to the sound administration of justice that only a new trial can effectively prevent such assaults on the integrity of the tribunal”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Payne
See State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 567-68 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Tok
See State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 567-68 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Warholic
See State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 563 , 462 A.2d 1001 (“a prompt cautionary instruction to the jury regarding improper prosecutorial remarks obviates any possible harm to the defendant”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Dews
See State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559 , 566-57 & n.5, 462 A.2d 1001 , cert, denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jarrett
See State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 563 , 462 A.2d 1001 (“prompt cautionary instruction to the jury regarding improper prosecutorial remarks obviates any possible harm to the defendant”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Northington Partners v. Executive Risk, No. X03 Cv99 0506449s (Oct. 3, 2002)
There are occasions when there is no possibility that any instruction will be curative; see State v. Ubaldi , 190 Conn. 559 , 575 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1001 , 104 S.Ct. 280 , 78 L.Ed.2d 259 (1983); and in such exceptional cases, the verdict should be set aside and a new trial ordered, regardless of whether the opposing party took exception to the remarks.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Thompson
See State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 570 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Downing
See State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 567-68 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Clark
See State v. Ubaldi, [ 190 Conn. 559, 563 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Satchwell
The defendant made no claim at trial, and he makes no claim on appeal, that the cautionary instruction given to the jury was incomplete or otherwise defective. “[W]e have previously recognized that a prompt cautionary instruction to the jury regarding improper prosecutorial remarks or questions can obviate any possible harm to the defendant.” St ate v. Cruz, 212 Conn. 351, 365 , 562 A.2d 1071 (1989); see State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 563 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Richardson
Further, in addressing the jury “ ‘[c]ounsel must be allowed a generous latitude in argument, as the limits of legitimate argument and fair comment cannot be determined precisely by rule and line, and something must be allowed for the zeal of counsel in the heat of argument.’ State v. Laudano, 74 Conn. 638, 646 , 51 A. 860 (1902); see State v. Greenberg, 92 Conn. 657, 663 , 103 A. 897 (1918).” State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 575 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Greene
Second, in the present case, the court did not issue a limiting evidentiary ruling; see id., 564 ; on,the scope of the reopening.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hancich
Ed. 2d 642 (1980); see Practice Book § 887.’ State v. Binet, 192 Conn. 618, 628 , 473 A.2d 1200 (1984), quoting State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 562 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 462 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Gaston
Ed. 2d 642 (1980); see Practice Book § 887.” State v. Binet, 192 Conn. 618, 628 , 473 A.2d 1200 (1984), quoting State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 562 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 462 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Independent Electric Supply, Inc. v. Commissioner
See Reid Brothers Logging Co. v. Ketchikan Pulp Co., 699 F.2d 1292, 1307 (9th Cir.) (no showing that trial court gave “determinative weight” to challenged evidence), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S.Ct. 279 , 280, 78 L.Ed.2d 259 (1983); Pursche v. Atlas Scraper & Engineering Co., 300 F.2d 467, 487-88 (9th Cir.1961) (in nonjury trial, admission of incompetent evidence not grounds for reversal where there is competent evidence to support the findings), ce rt. denied, 371 U.S. 911 , 83 S.Ct. 251 , 9 L.Ed.2d 170 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see"
Independent Electric Supply, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Frank Prestipino and Leana Prestipino, Hildegard K. Marks, and Jean D. Littlefield v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Reid Brothers Logging Co. v. Ketchikan Pulp Co., 699 F.2d 1292, 1307 (9th Cir.) (no showing that trial court gave "determinative weight" to challenged evidence), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S.Ct. 279 , 280, 78 L.Ed.2d 259 (1983); Pursche v. Atlas Scraper & Engineering Co., 300 F.2d 467, 487-88 (9th Cir.1961) (in nonjury trial, admission of incompetent evidence not grounds for reversal where there is competent evidence to support the findings), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 911 , 83 S.Ct. 251 , 9 L.Ed.2d 170 (1962). 23 We conclude that the Tax Court's finding that the trusts and partnerships …
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Kimbro
See generally State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 575 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1001 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Triangle Mining Co., Inc., and Terteling Land Company v. Stauffer Chemical Company
See Reid Brothers Logging Co. v. Ketchikan Pulp Co., 699 F.2d 1292, 1307 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.—-—, 104 S.Ct. 279 -80, 78 L.Ed.2d 259 (1983); Fed.R.Civ.P. 61; see also Burgess v. Premier Corp., 727 F.2d 826, 833, 836 (9th Cir.1984). *744 For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Stauffer.
cited
Cited "see"
Yeske v. Avon Old Farms School, Inc.
There are occasions when there is no possibility that any instruction will be curative; see State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 575 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1001 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Elson
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 572, 575 , 462 A.2d 1001 (supervisoiy power invoked to reverse judgment of conviction on basis of prosecutorial impropriety), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Reynolds
See, e.g., State v. Ubaldi, [ 190 Conn. 559, 575 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Payne
See, e.g., State v. Ubaldi, [ 190 Conn. 559, 575 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Munoz
Rule 804 (a) lists five situations in which the declarant witness may be considered unavailable: (1) the court has determined that the witness has a testimonial privilege; (2) the witness persists in refusing to testify despite a court order to do so; (3) the witness has a lack of memory; (4) the witness is unable to be present or testify because of death or existing physical or mental illness or infirmity; and (5) the witness is ‘absent from the hearing and the proponent of his statement has been unable to procure his attendance ... [or testimony] by process or other reasonable means.’ �…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Herring
In argument before the jury, “trial counsel should not state or suggest an inference from facts that are not in evidence.” State v. Manley, 195 Conn. 567, 580 , 489 A.2d 1024 (1985); see also State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 575 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alaska Lumber & Pulp Co., Inc.
v.
Reid Brothers Logging Co. and Ketchikan Pulp Co. v. Reid Brothers Logging Co.
v.
Reid Brothers Logging Co. and Ketchikan Pulp Co. v. Reid Brothers Logging Co.
No. 83-301; No. 83-307.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 17, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 699 F. 2d 1292.