green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.5 score
“subjeet to certain exceptions, pre-trial discovery in a criminal case is within the sound discretion of the trial court”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Evans v. Mutual Mining
subject to certain exceptions, pre-trial discovery in a criminal case is within the sound discretion of the trial court
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State ex rel. Melanie Kaye P. v. MacQueen
subjeet to certain exceptions, pre-trial discovery in a criminal case is within the sound discretion of the trial court
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Douglas Dale Kienenberger, United States of America v. Douglas Dale Kienenberger
See Locks v. Sumner, 703 F.2d 403, 407-08 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 933 , 104 S.Ct. 338 , 78 L.Ed.2d 307 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Neri v. Hornbeak
See Gordon v. Duran, 895 F.2d 610, 613-14 (9th Cir.1990); see also Locks v. Sumner, 703 F.2d 403, 408 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 933 , 104 S.Ct. 338 , 78 L.Ed.2d 307 (1983); Mack v. Cupp, 564 F.2d 898, 901 (9th Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wisdom v. State
(2×)
See also Reed v. State, 657 P.2d 662, 665 (Okl.Cr.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 933 , 104 S.Ct. 337 , 78 L.Ed.2d 307 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Larry A. Turnbull
Id; see also Locks v. Sumner, 703 F.2d 403, 407-08 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 933 , 104 S.Ct. 338 , 78 L.Ed.2d 307 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Darrell Martin v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary, and Mark v. Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South Dakota
(2×)
Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509 , 102 S.Ct. 1198 , 71 L.Ed.2d 379 (1982); see, e.g., Hall v. Iowa, 705 F.2d 283, 286-87 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 934 , 104 S.Ct. 339 , 78 L.Ed.2d 307 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marvin Arnesto Crews, Jr.
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Dysart, 705 F.2d 1247, 1256 (10th Cir.) (threatening letters mailed to President), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 934 , 104 S.Ct. 339 , 78 L.Ed.2d 307 (1983); United States v. Smith, 670 F.2d 921 , 923 & n. 4 (10th Cir.1982) (threatening letter mailed to President); United States v. Hart, 457 F.2d 1087, 1090 (10th Cir.) (threatening call made to FBI), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 861 , 93 S.Ct. 150 , 34 L.Ed.2d 108 (1972). 49 I agree that this approach is consistent with the purposes of the statute.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
R.B. Williams v. Al C. Parke, Warden
(2×)
See, e.g., Locks v. Sumner, 703 F.2d 403, 406-07 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 338 , 78 L.Ed.2d 307 (1983); Ellis v. Reed, 596 F.2d 1195, 1199-1200 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 973 , 100 S.Ct. 468 , 62 L.Ed.2d 388 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hall
v.
Iowa
v.
Iowa
No. 82-6902.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 31, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: West Virginia Supreme Court (2)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certio-rari denied.