green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.2 score
“the trial court may properly deny leave to amend where the amendment would not withstand a motion to dismiss”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 42 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Thomas v. Ford Motor Co.
the trial court may properly deny leave to amend where the amendment would not withstand a motion to dismiss
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Weiss v. Parker Hannifan Corp.
the nature of the required showing depends on the circumstances of the case
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Mason v. Association for Independent Growth
Ct. 349, 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983). 6 While it is true that Mason’s argument depends on counterfactual speculation as to whether she similarly would have gotten into an accident had she been promoted to Assistant Residential Director, back pay award determinations inevitably involve recreating the conditions that would have existed absent the unlawful discrimination, and “[t]his process of recreating the past will necessarily involve a degree of approximation and imprecision.” International Bhd. of Teamsters v. United States, 431 U.S. 324, 372 , 97 S.Ct. 1843, 1873 , 52 L.Ed.2d 396 (1977); s…
discussed
Cited "see"
Kyer v. Commonwealth
See Taylor v. Alabama, 457 U.S. 687, 691 , 102 S.Ct. 2664, 2667 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1982) (six hours between illegal arrest and confession); Brown, 422 U.S. at 604 , 95 S.Ct. at 2262 (two hours between arrest and confession).
discussed
Cited "see"
Quality Botanical Ingredients, Inc. v. Triarco Industries, Inc. (In Re Quality Botanical Ingredients, Inc.)
See, Harrison Beverage Co. v. Dribeck Importers, Inc., 133 F.R.D. 463, 468 (D.N.J. 1990) (quoting Massarsky v. General Mo *630 tors Corp., 706 F.2d 111, 125 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Murray v. Newark Housing Authority
See gen., Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111, 117 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983). 5 Plaintiff in this matter has chosen to proceed on a theory of disparate treatment.
cited
Cited "see"
Glosser v. S & T Bank (In Re Ambulatory Medical & Surgical Health Care, Inc.)
See Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111, 125 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Glaziers & Glass Workers Union Local No. 252 Annuity Fund v. Janney Montgomery Scott, Inc.
See Massarsky v. GM Corp., 706 F.2d 111 , 125 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Dibiase v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.
See Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111, 120 (3d Cir.) (internal quotation omitted), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Raber v. Eastern Associated Coal Corp.
See Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983); Whitten v. Farmland Industries, Inc., 759 F.Supp. 1522 (D.Kan.1991); Franci v. Avco Corp., 538 F.Supp. 250 (D.Conn.1982). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ali DAEMI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHURCH’S FRIED CHICKEN, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Cariddi v. Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc., 568 F.2d 87, 88 (8th Cir.1977); see Whatley v. Skaggs Companies, 707 F.2d 1129 , 1139 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 938 , 104 S.Ct. 349 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation
(2×)
See Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111, 118 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Union Fire Insurance Co. Of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Circle, Inc., Grillot Co., Inc., and Cirlot Co., Inc.
(2×)
See id. at 427 n. 18.
discussed
Cited "see"
Irvin Bailey, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Louis W. Sullivan 1 , M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States of America, Irvin Bailey, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Louis W. Sullivan 1 , M.D. Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States of America
See Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111, 125 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983) (leave to amend need not be granted where the amendment would not withstand a motion to dismiss).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lutz v. Chromatex, Inc.
See Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111 , 125 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983); Polay v. West Co., 629 F.Supp. 899, 901 (E.D.Pa.1986); see also Coupland v. Commercial Credit Union Insurance Co., No. 88-1112 (M.D.Pa.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bailey v. Sullivan
See Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111, 125 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983) (leave to amend need not be granted where the amendment would not withstand a motion to dismiss).
cited
Cited "see"
Shieh v. Lyng
See Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111, 118 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Centifanti v. Nix
See Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111, 125 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983). 44 The district court determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Centifanti's complaint under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine.
cited
Cited "see"
Centifanti v. Nix
See Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111, 125 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.
See Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111, 125 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983); see also Outboard Marine Corp. v. Pezetel, 535 F.Supp. 248, 252 (D.Del.1982). 7 The six defenses fit into two general categories, those that challenge the validity of the construction and safety standards and one that alleges selective enforcement of the Act.
cited
Cited "see"
Roebuck, Dr. James R. v. Drexel University
See Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111 , 118 n. 13 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alvin W. MEADE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERCHANTS FAST MOTORLINE, INC., Defendant-Appellee
See Whatley v. Skaggs Companies, Inc., 707 F.2d 1129 , 1139 & 1139 n. 9 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 938 , 104 S.Ct. 349 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983); see also Brown, 425 U.S. at 833 , 96 S.Ct. at 1968 ; Lowe v. City of Monrovia, 775 F.2d 998, 1010 (9th Cir.1985), amended, 784 F.2d 1407 (1986); Day v. Wayne County Board of Auditors, 749 F.2d 1199, 1203 (6th Cir.1984); Gooding v. Warner-Lambert Co., 744 F.2d 354, 359 (3d Cir.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Denton v. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers
See Whatley v. Skaggs Companies, 508 F.Supp. 302 (D.Colo.1981), affirmed in pertinent part, 707 F.2d 1129 , 1137 (10th Cir.), *1163 cert. denied, 464 U.S. 938 , 104 S.Ct. 349 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Kronfeld v. First Jersey National Bank
See Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111, 125 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
See Massarsky v. General Motors, 706 F.2d 111 , 118 n. 13 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Balliet v. Whitmire
See Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morgan v. Humboldt County School District
See Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111 (3rd Cir.1983) cert. denied 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983) (trial court may deny leave to amend where amendment would not withstand a motion to dismiss); Jafree v. Barber, 689 F.2d 640 (7th Cir.1982) (denial of leave to amend was not abuse of discretion where amendment failed to disclose that official actions were prompted by racial animus); Rauch v. United Instruments, Inc., 405 F.Supp. 435 (E.D.Pa.1975) rev’d on other grounds 548 F.2d 452 (3rd Cir.1976) (court must avoid useless acts by measuring proposed amendments …
discussed
Cited "see"
Grandison v. Cuyler
(2×)
See Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111, 125 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.
See Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111 (3d Cir.), cert. denied — U.S. — , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983); cf. Geller v. Markham, 635 F.2d 1027 (3d Cir.1980) (disparate impact theory recognized under the ADEA), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 945 , 101 S.Ct. 2028 , 68 L.Ed.2d 332 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hopkins v. First NLC Financial Services, LLC (In Re Hopkins)
Inc., 103 F.R.D. 385 (N.D.Ill.1984); see also Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111, 125 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983); Sarfaty v. Nowak, 369 F.2d 256 , 259 (7th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 909 , 87 S.Ct. 1691 , 18 L.Ed.2d 627 (1967) (“Rule 15(a) does not require a court to do a futile thing.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Total Containment, Inc.
See e.g., Alston v. Parker, 363 F.3d 229, 235 (3d Cir.2004) (“We have held that even when a plaintiff does not seek leave to amend, if a complaint is vulnerable to 12(b)(6) dismissal, a District Court must permit a curative amendment, unless an amendment would be inequitable or futile.”); Peterson v. Philadelphia Stock Exchange, 717 F.Supp. 332, 337 (E.D.Pa. 1989); see generally Mosler v. M/K Ventures Inti Inc., 103 F.R.D. 385 (N.D.Ill. 1984); see also Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111, 125 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983); Sarfaty…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frank L. SPULAK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. K MART CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant
See EEOC v. Sandia Corp., 639 F.2d 600, 627 (10th Cir.1980) (citing United States v. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc., 625 F.2d 918 (10th Cir.1979)); see also Whatley v. Skaggs Companies, Inc., 707 F.2d 1129, 1138 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 938 , 104 S.Ct. 349 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Adeline M. Bruno v. W.B. Saunders Company and Cbs Educational and Professional Publishing, a Division of Cbs, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Massarsky v. General Motors, 706 F.2d 111 , 118 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983) (to make out prima facie case, plaintiff “need only show that he is a member of the protected class and that he was laid off from a job for which he was qualified while others not in the protected class were treated more favorably”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Texarkana National Bank
(2×)
See also, Austin v. Decker Coal Co., 701 F.2d 420, 425 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 938 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Monroe v. Williams
See, e.g., Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111, 125 (3rd Cir.1983), cert. den., 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baker v. McDonald's Corp.
See, also, Lewis v. University of Pittsburgh, 725 F.2d 910 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 892 , 105 S.Ct. 266 , 83 L.Ed.2d 802 (1984) and Whatley v. Skaggs Companies, Inc., 707 F.2d 1129 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 938 , 104 S.Ct. 349 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.
See, e.g., Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111, 117 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983). 23 The instant action presents a disparate treatment claim in which plaintiffs allege they were adversely affected by a pattern or practice of discriminatory treatment. 24 In a disparate treatment Title VII class action such as Teamsters, plaintiffs have the initial burden to “establish by a preponderance of the evidence that [the prohibited] discrimination was the company’s standard operating procedure—the regular rather than the unusual practice…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Denton v. Boilermakers Local 29
See also Whatley v. Skaggs Co., 707 F.2d 1129 , 1139 n. 10 (10th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 938 , 104 S.Ct. 349 , 78 L.Ed. 2d 314 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dorothy E. Dreyer and Naomi D. Strayer v. Arco Chemical Company, a Division of Atlantic Richfield Company
See Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 129 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982); see also Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111 , 118 n. 13 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983) (nature of plaintiffs showing depends on circumstances of the case); Thompson, Houserman & Jordan, Age Discrimination in Reduction-in-Force: The Metamorphosis of McDonnell Douglas Continues, 8 Indus.Rel.L.Rev. 47, 57-58 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Randy A. Foreman v. Exxon Corporation, Third-Party Cross-Appellant v. Diamond M Company, Offshore Casing Crews, Inc., Third-Party Cross-Appellee
Id.; see also City of Austin v. Decker Coal Co., 701 F.2d 420, 425 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983); Matador Drilling Co. v. Post, 662 F.2d 1190, 1195 (5th Cir.1981). 752 F.2d at 955-56 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tommy Lynn Weathersby v. Conoco Oil Company, Conoco Oil Company v. Global Marine, and National Supply Company
Id.; see also City of Austin v. Decker Coal Co., 701 F.2d 420, 425 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983); Matador Drilling Co. v. Post, 662 F.2d 1190, 1195 (5th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
North Shore Laboratories Corp. v. Harris C. Cohen, Leonard Lyons, Richard Wolf, the Wonder Seal Co., Intervenor-Appellee
See also City of Austin, Texas v. Decker Coal Co., 701 F.2d 420, 425-26 (1983) cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983); In re Stratford of Texas, Inc., 635 F.2d 365, 368 (5th Cir.1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ruiz
v.
Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary
v.
Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary
No. 83-392.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 31, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: D. New Jersey (2)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.