Filco v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc., 464 U.S. 956 (1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Filco v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc., 464 U.S. 956 (1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
57 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Lewis v. State (fladistctapp, 1997-05-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Lewis v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1997 · signal: accord · confidence high
The judge decided to give the instruction. [1] Discussion Jury instructions requested by the State "must relate to issues concerning evidence received at trial." Butler v. State, 493 So.2d 451, 452 (Fla.1986); accord Buford v. Wainwright, 428 So.2d 1389, 1390-91 (Fla.) ("Only instructions which have support in the record should be given to the jury."), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 956 , 104 S.Ct. 372 , 78 L.Ed.2d 331 (1983); Griffin v. State, 370 So.2d 860, 861 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)(a charge requires an "appropriate factual basis in the record").
discussed Cited "see" Halverson v. Skagit County
9th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Paulson v. County of Pierce, 99 Wash.2d 645 , 664 P.2d 1202, 1207 (en banc) (holding that Washington state law "implicitly creates a class of landowners whose property might be damaged as a result of a county's flood control activities [but] precludes recovery by all those within the designated class."), appeal dismissed, 464 U.S. 957 , 104 S.Ct. 386 , 78 L.Ed.2d 331 (1983) 5 Article 1, Sec. 16 of the Washington Constitution prohibits the taking or damaging of private property without just compensation.
discussed Cited "see" Halverson v. Skagit County
9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Paulson v. County of Pierce, 99 Wash.2d 645 , 664 P.2d 1202, 1207 (en banc) (holding that Washington state law “implicitly creates a class of landowners whose property might be damaged as a result of a county's flood control activities [but] precludes recovery by all those within the designated class."), appeal dismissed, 464 U.S. 957 , 104 S.Ct. 386 , 78 L.Ed.2d 331 (1983). .
discussed Cited "see" Rawls v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Buford v. Wainwright, 428 So.2d 1389, 1390 (Fla.) (objection to erroneous instruction properly preserved where counsel objected during charge conference), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 956 , 104 S.Ct. 372 , 78 L.Ed.2d 331 (1983).
cited Cited "see" C & W Construction Co. v. Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, Local 745
D. Haw. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Filco v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc., 709 F.2d 1257, 1266 (9th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 464 U.S. 956 , 104 S.Ct. 385 , 78 L.Ed.2d 331 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" The Jeanery, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, and Rock Bottom Jean Co., Inc., an Oregon Corporation v. James Jeans, Inc., a Washington Corporation (2×)
9th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Filco v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc., 709 F.2d 1257, 1265 (9th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 464 U.S. 956 , 104 S.Ct. 385 , 78 L.Ed.2d 331 (1983); Sweeney, 637 F.2d at 115-16 .
discussed Cited "see" Moffat v. Lane Co., Inc.
D. Mass. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Filco v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc., 709 F.2d 1257 (9th Cir.), cert. dismissed, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 385 , 78 L.Ed.2d 331 (1983); Bruce Drug, Inc. v. Hollister, Inc., 688 F.2d 853 (1st Cir.1982); Davis-Watkins Co. v. Service Merchandise, 686 F.2d 1190 (6th Cir.1982); H.L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." James Earle v. Robert Benoit
1st Cir. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Filco v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc., 709 F.2d 1257, 1267 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 956 , 104 S.Ct. 385 , 78 L.Ed.2d 331 (1983); Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 639 F.2d 75, 80-81 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981); SEC v. Tome, 638 F.Supp. 629, 633 (S.D.N.Y.1986).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Securities & Exchange Commission v. Tome
S.D.N.Y. · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Rule 1101(b), Fed.R.Evid.; see e.g., Filco v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc., 709 F.2d 1257, 1267 (9th Cir.) (discussing coconspirator exclusion in a civil case), cert. dismissed, 464 U.S. 956 , 104 S.Ct. 385 , 78 L.Ed.2d 331 (1983); Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 639 F.2d 75, 80-81 (2d Cir.1980) (same), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Richards v. Nielsen Freight Lines
E.D. Cal. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Filco v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc., 709 F.2d 1257, 1266 (9th Cir.) (vertical price fixing), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 104 S.Ct. 385 , 78 L.Ed.2d 331 (1983); Esco Corp. v. United States, 340 F.2d 1000, 1008 (9th Cir.1965) (citing United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., 334 U.S. 131 , 68 S.Ct. 915 , 92 L.Ed. 1260 (1948)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Filco
v.
Amana Refrigeration, Inc.
No. 83-389.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 4, 1983.
464 U.S. 956
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 53.