green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.2 score
“a principle of contract interpretation is that the contract must be interpreted in accordance with the parties' understanding as shown by their conduct before the controversy.”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
National Federation of Blind, Inc. v. Loompanics Enterprises, Inc.
But see National Conference of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc., 692 F.2d 478, 488 (7th Cir.1982) (“[I]f the components of a trade name are common descriptive [generic] terms, a combination of such terms retains that quality.”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Manuel Bros. v. United States
a principle of contract interpretation is that the contract must be interpreted in accordance with the parties' understanding as shown by their conduct before the controversy.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
College Entrance Examination Board v. Pataki
we agree with the register of copyrights that the would probably be classified as an unpublished work under 17 u.s.c. 101 ...
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Regan
a description is sufficiently particular when it enables the searcher to reasonably ascertain and identify the things authorized to be seized
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Mil-Mar Shoe Company, Incorporated v. Shonac Corporation
Technical Publishing Co. v. Lebhar-Friedman, Inc., 729 F.2d 1136, 1139 (7th Cir.1984); National Conference of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc., 692 F.2d 478, 488 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 5.Ct. 69, 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cochran v. State
See United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343 , 1350 n. 6 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983) (concluding that an affidavit can be used to cure lack of particularity in a warrant if the affidavit is either incorporated into or attached to the warrant).
discussed
Cited "see"
Savoy v. United States
“However, the person seeking return of *933 property must show that they are lawfully entitled to possess it.” United States v. Headley, 50 Fed.Appx. 266, 267 (6th Cir. 2002) (unpublished order); accord Sovereign News Co. v. United States, 690 F.2d 569, 577 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); United States v. Francis, 646 F.2d 251, 262 (6th Cir.) (holding that Rule 41 places the burden on the claimant), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 637 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Somerstein
See United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983) (affirming conviction for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 664 based, in part, on loans made in furtherance of a fraudulent scheme).
discussed
Cited "see"
Villa v. United States
See Julius Goldman’s Egg City v. United States, 697 F.2d 1051, 1058 (Fed.Cir.) (“A principle of contract interpretation is that the contract must be interpreted in accordance with the parties’ understanding as shown by their conduct before the controversy.”), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 68 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Ross v. Runyon
See Lawson v. Truck Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers, 698 F.2d 250, 255-56 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Wag-Aero, Inc. v. United States
See United States v. Waugneux, 683 F.2d 1343, 1348 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bianco
See United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343, 1351, n. 6 (11th Cir.1982) (looking to underlying affidavit even where unattached to warrant, where searchers were adequately informed of limitations on search), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); United States v. Zanche, 541 F.Supp. 207, 213 (W.D.N.Y.1982) (“[i]t was also proper to examine the affidavit in deciding the degree of specificity required in the warrant”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bianco
See United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343, 1351, n. 6 (11th Cir.1982) (looking to underlying affidavit even where unattached to warrant, where searchers were adequately informed of limitations on search), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); United States v. Zanche, 541 F.Supp. 207, 213 (W.D.N.Y.1982) ("[i]t was also proper to examine the affidavit in deciding the degree of specificity required in the warrant").
cited
Cited "see"
Granite Construction Company v. The United States
See Julius Goldman’s Egg City v. United States, 697 F.2d 1051, 1058 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 68 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Town of Fallsburg v. United States
See Julius Goldman’s Egg City v. United States, 697 F.2d 1051, 1055 (Fed.Cir.), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 68 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trans Pacific Insurance v. Trans-Pacific Insurance
See National Conference of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc., 692 F.2d 478, 488 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); American Diabetes Ass’n v. National Diabetes Ass’n, 533 F.Supp. 16, 19 (E.D.Pa.1981), aff'd, 681 F.2d 804 (3d Cir. 1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Birtcher Electro Medical Systems, Inc. v. Beacon Laboratories, Inc.
See National Conference of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc., 692 F.2d 478 , 488 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 *425 U.S. 814, 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wright v. United States
See Julius Goldman’s Egg City v. United States, 697 F.2d 1051 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 68 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983) (cited as Egg City II). 5 This court finds, therefore, that the combination of: 1) the congressional intent to encourage those injured by government destruction to assist the government in its greater effort to eradicate the disease by fair compensation, 2) the consistent findings of courts that fair market value, notwithstanding the fact that it has a settled legal meaning, cannot mean a value that fails to provide adequate compensation, and 3) the Secre…
discussed
Cited "see"
American International Group, Inc. v. American International Airways, Inc.
See National Conference of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, 692 F.2d 478 , 488 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); American Diabetes Association v. National Diabetes Association, 533 F.Supp. 16, 19 (E.D.Pa.1981), aff'd, 681 F.2d 804 (3d Cir.1982). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Murphy Door Bed Co. v. Interior Sleep Systems, Inc.
See National Conference v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc., 692 F.2d 478 , 488 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); Reese Publishing Co., Inc. v. Hampton International Communications, Inc., 620 F.2d 7, 11 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch Inc.
(2×)
See National Conference of Bar *1467 Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc., 692 F.2d 478, 487 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed. 2d 83 (1983). 18.
cited
Cited "see"
Laurel C. Thomas v. Walter Shipka, in His Capacity as Clerk of the Parma Municipal Court
See Lawson v. Truck Drivers, 698 F.2d 250 , 254 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilfried Van Cauwenberghe
See Sovereign News Co. v. United States, 690 F.2d 569, 577 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); United States v. Hubbard, 650 F.2d 293 , 303 (D.C.Cir.1980); Fed.R.Crim.P. advisory committee note; 3 C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilfried Van Cauwenberghe
See Sovereign News Co. v. United States, 690 F.2d 569, 577 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); United States v. Hubbard, 650 F.2d 293 , 303 (D.C.Cir.1980); Fed.R.Crim.P. advisory committee note; 3 C.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Caporale
See United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir.1982), cert denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Caporale, Alfred Pilotto, Seymour A. Gopman, Bernard Rubin, George Wuagneux, Salvatore Tricario, Louis C. Ostrer, and John Giardiello, Defendants- United States of America v. Seymour Gopman, Salvatore Tricario, George Wuagneux, Louis C. Ostrer, John Giardiello, James Caporale, Alfred Pilotto and Bernard Rubin, Defendants
See United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
John J. Adkins, (83-3392, 83-3416), Cross v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio-Clc Local 801, International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio-Clc, General Motors Corporation, Cross-Appellant. Association of Frigidaire Model Makers, (83-3754, 83-3793), Plaintiffs- Cross-Appellees v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio-Clc Local 801, International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio-Clc, General Motors Corporation, Cross-Appellant. Former Frigidaire Employees Association, (83-3820), Plaintiffs v. Local 801, International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio- Clc
See Lawson v. Truck Drivers, Local Union 100, 698 F.2d 250, 255-56 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); Estes v. Kentucky Utilities Co., 636 F.2d 1131 (6th Cir.1980); Hayden v. Ford Motor Co., 497 F.2d 1292 (6th Cir.1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Darrell D. McNair v. United States Postal Service
See Lawson v. Truck Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers, 698 F.2d 250, 255-56 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ricks v. Glen
See Lawson v. Truck Drivers, Chauffers & Helpers, Local Union 100, 698 F.2d 250, 254 (6th Cir.) cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 69, 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); Chevron Oil v. Huson, 404 U.S. 97, 106-07 , 92 S.Ct. 349, 355-56 , 30 L.Ed.2d 296 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Adkins v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers
See Lawson v. Truck Drivers, Local Union 100, 698 F.2d 250, 255-56 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); Estes v. Kentucky Utilities Co., 636 F.2d 1131 (6th Cir.1980); Hayden v. Ford Motor Co., 497 F.2d 1292 (6th Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Systems Exploration, Inc. v. United States
See Julius Goldman’s Egg City v. United States, 697 F.2d 1051 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 68 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); A & K Plumbing & Mechanical, Inc. v. United States, 1 Cl.Ct. 716 (1983).
examined
Cited "see"
United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Anthony Accardo, Cross-Appellants
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Thus, at least with respect to Pinckard, the magistrate who issued these warrants might have had reason to authorize the seizure of “all corporate records.” See, e.g., United States v. Brien, 617 F.2d 299, 305-09 (1st Cir.) (approving warrant authorizing seizure of materials that made up "most of the business records” of investment firm), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 919 , 100 S.Ct. 1854 , 64 L.Ed.2d 273 (1980); see generally United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343, 1348-51 (11th Cir.1982) (collecting cases on warrants in context of complex, fraudulent business schemes), cert. denied, — U.S…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roy L. Williams, Thomas F. O'malley, Andrew G. Massa, Joseph Lombardo
See United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343, 1355 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); United States v. Lefkowitz, 618 F.2d 1313, 1317 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 824 , 101 S.Ct. 86 , 66 L.Ed.2d 27 (1980); United States v. Cruz, 594 F.2d 268, 272 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 898 , 100 S.Ct. 205 , 62 L.Ed.2d 133 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Alabama v. Kala Blakely and Bartley Evan Blakely
See also United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983) and United States v. Rettig, 589 F.2d 418, 423 (9th Cir. 1978) ('The question is whether or not the search that was conducted was confined to the authorization given by the magistrate.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Interstate Net Bank v. NetB@ Nk, Inc.
See e.g., Nat’l Conference of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc., 692 F.2d 478 , 488 (7th Cir.1982) (holding that “Mul-tistate Bar Examination” is not protected and use of “MBE” to designate test “is of no consequence”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983). *524 Defendants correctly point out that there is no dictionary definition of the exact term “netbank,” and argue that the Court must examine the mark as a whole and not consider its component elements separately.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. State
See also United States v. Wuagneux , 683 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983) and United States v. Rettig , 589 F.2d 418 , 423 (9th Cir. 1978) ("The question is whether or not the search that was conducted was confined to the authorization given by the magistrate.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Suh v. Yang
See, e.g., National Conf. of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, 692 F.2d 478 , 487 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); Abercrombie & Fitch, 537 F.2d at 9 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Columbia Pictures Television v. Krypton Broadcasting of Birmingham, Inc.
See, e.g., National Conference of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc., 692 F.2d 478 , 488 & n. 12 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Columbia Pictures Television v. Krypton Broadcasting Of Birmingham, Inc.
See, e.g., National Conference of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc., 692 F.2d 478 , 488 & n. 12 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sego
Super. 280, 284-85 , 601 A. 2d 757 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 127 N.J. 564 , 606 A. 2d 374 (1992); see also United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F. 2d 1343, 1357-58 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed. 2d 83 (1983); Henderson v. State, 765 S.W. 2d 336, 338 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989); State v. Kline, 11 Ohio App. 3d 208, 210-213 , 11 OBR 330, 333-336, 464 N.E. 2d 159, 162-65 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re of the Search of 4330 North 35th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
See Mr. Lucky Messenger Service, 587 F.2d at 18 ; Interstate Cigar, 928 F.2d at 224 ; see also, Sovereign News Co. v. United States, 690 F.2d 569 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McLeod v. State
See also United States v. Wuagneux , 683 F.2d 1343 , 1355-56 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983) (in view of the fact that a trial court "may limit the number of defense witnesses without depriving a defendant of due process, particularly when there is no offer of proof as to the substance of the proposed witness' testimony and its materiality, or when the testimony would be cumulative or irrelevant . . . a request for continuance in order to procure additional witnesses is a matter within the sound discretion of the [trial] court, and when the re…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
White Fabricating Company, Diversified Industries, Inc. v. United States
(2×)
Compare the cases cited by the government on this question, although neither are obscenity cases, United States v. Spilotro, 800 F.2d 959 (9th Cir.1986) (a decision by Judge Kennedy holding the warrant too broad and general), with United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983). 30 In this respect, we hold that the district court was in error in not conducting a hearing to consider carefully the ramifications and circumstances involved in the issuance of the warrant.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blinded Veterans Association v. Blinded American Veterans Foundation
See, e.g., National Conf. of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, 692 F.2d 478 , 487 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); Abercrombie & Fitch, 537 F.2d at 9 . 6 Descriptive terms, which compose the second category, directly describe a partic *70 ular quality, function, or characteristic of a product or service. 7 Because descriptive terms are thus not inherently distinctive, they acquire trademark protection only upon proof of secondary meaning — ie., upon proof that the public recognizes only one source of the product or service.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blinded Veterans Ass'n v. Blinded American Veterans Foundation
See, e.g., National Conf. of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, 692 F.2d 478 , 487 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); Abercrombie & Fitch, 537 F.2d at 9 . 6 Descriptive terms, which compose the second category, directly describe a partic ular quality, function, or characteristic of a product or service. 7 Because descriptive terms are thus not inherently distinctive, they acquire trademark protection only upon proof of secondary meaning — i.e., upon proof that the public recognizes only one source of the product or service.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hadley
Compare id. (court described conduct as a deliberate deception, when an internal revenue agent intentionally led defendant to believe that evidence would be used only in a civil investigation when, in fact, the agent was conducting a criminal investigation) with United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983) (internal revenue agent need not expressly advise taxpayer that a civil audit may lead to criminal proceedings).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas H. Greene
See, e.g., United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343, 1360 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Henri's Food Products Co., Inc. v. Tasty Snacks, Inc.
See also National Conference of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc., 692 F.2d 478 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 *1306 (1983), ("multistate bar examination" held to be unprotectable).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David L. Ladd, Register of Copyrights, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellee v. Law & Technology Press, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant
See Washingtonian Publishing Co. v. Pearson, 306 U.S. 30, 41 , 59 S.Ct. 397, 402 , 83 L.Ed. 470 (1939) (delay in copyright deposit and registration does not invalidate copyright); see also National Conference of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc., 692 F.2d 478, 485-86 (7th Cir.1982) (copyright regulation allowing deposit of excised portion of testing materials valid), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Edward Andrews
See also United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Julius Goldman's Egg City
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-1645.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1983.
Published
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.