green
Positive treatment
7.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Islamic Center of Mississippi, Inc. v. City of Starkville, Mississippi
But see Lakewood Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses, Inc. v. City of Lakewood, 699 F.2d 303, 307 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 815 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983). 7 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Foster v. United States
(2×)
Also, when the court thereafter referred to what Gonzalez describes as a two-prong exception, the court refers to “the Bruton tests”, id. at 1059 (emphasis added), which, given the court’s previous discussion, can only be first, is there a Confrontation Clause violation, and second, if so, is there reversible error because limiting instructions will not suffice to protect the defendant’s constitutional rights. 4 Later in United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983), the court reaffirmed that Bruton was inapplicable if t…
discussed
Cited "see"
Timberline Baptist Church v. Washington County
See Lakewood, Ohio Cong. of Jehovah's Witnesses, Inc. v. City of Lakewood, Ohio, 699 F.2d 303, 306 (6th Cir.), cert. den., 464 U.S. 815 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983) (holding that "[i]nconvenient economic burdens on religious freedom do not rise to a constitutionally impermissible infringement of free exercise"); see also Episcopal Student Foundation v. City of Ann Arbor, 341 F.Supp.2d 691, 706 (E.D.Mich.2004) (quoting Lakewood, 699 F.2d at 307 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hively
See United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 77 (2nd Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983)(refusing to draw a distinction between civil and criminal cases when considering a reporter’s interest in confidentiality); United States v. Cuthbertson, 630 F.2d 139, 147 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981)(considering subpoena for documentary materials).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Muyet
See United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 83 (2d Cir.) (“The burden is upon the moving defendant to show facts demonstrating that he will be so severely prejudiced by a joint trial that it would in effect deny him a fair trial.” (quoting United States v. Rucker, 586 F.2d 899, 902 (2d Cir. 1978))), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
City Of Cleveland, Ohio v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Workers, 367 U.S. 396, 409 , 81 S.Ct. 1529, 1535 , 6 L.Ed.2d 924 (1961) (noting "peculiar responsibility and place of the Joint Committee" in developing statutory scheme); accord Alabama Power Co. v. NRC, 692 F.2d 1362, 1368 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Cleveland v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Workers, 367 U.S. 396, 409 , 81 S.Ct. 1529, 1535 , 6 L.Ed.2d 924 (1961) (noting “peculiar responsibility and place of the Joint Committee” in developing statutory scheme); accord Alabama Power Co. v. NRC, 692 F.2d 1362, 1368 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
City of Cleveland v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
See Alabama Power Co. v. NRC, 692 F.2d 1362 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
City of Cleveland, Ohio v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, Ohio Edison Company, Toledo Edison Company, City of Brook Park, Ohio, Intervenors. Ohio Edison Company v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America, City of Cleveland, Ohio, Intervenor. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and the Toledo Edison Company v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America, City of Cleveland, Ohio, Intervenor. City of Cleveland, Ohio v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
See Alabama Power Co. v. NRC, 692 F.2d 1362 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
PPM America, Inc. v. Marriott Corp.
See United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76-77 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); In re Petroleum Prods.
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Sanusi
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70 , 78 n. 9 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983) (courts are encouraged to inspect sensitive documents, including media workproduct, to determine if they contain probative evidence); United States v. Gambino, 741 F.Supp. 412, 414 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (“in camera inspections *152 provide a useful intermediate step between full disclosure and total nondisclosure”).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Letellier
See United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 77 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); LaRouche v. National Broadcasting Co., 780 F.2d 1134 , 1139 *726 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 818 , 107 S.Ct. 79 , 93 L.Ed.2d 34 (1986); Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d at 712 .
cited
Cited "see"
Burke v. United States
See United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wiley
See United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 83 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983) (trial judge ruling on Rule 14 motion has broad discretion in determining whether joint prosecution will unfairly prejudice defendant); United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224, 241 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981) (amount of evidence unrelated to a defendant is insufficient reason to reverse trial judge's decision to try cases jointly).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wiley
See United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 83 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983) (trial judge ruling on Rule 14 motion has broad discretion in determining whether joint prosecution will unfairly prejudice defendant); United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224, 241 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981) (amount of evidence unrelated to a defendant is insufficient reason to reverse trial judge’s decision to try cases jointly).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fred B. Black, Jr., (Two Cases)
See United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 78-81 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); see also United States v. Gordon, 817 F.2d 1538, 1542-43 (11th Cir.1987) (request to jury to continue deliberating on remaining charges after jury returned a partial verdict is not coercive); Ross, 626 F.2d at 81 (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Driscoll v. Morris
See United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76-77 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); Baker v. F & F Investments, 470 F.2d 778, 783 (2d Cir.1972), cert, denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973); Garland v. Torre, 259 F.2d 545, 548 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 910 , 79 S.Ct. 237 , 3 L.Ed.2d 231 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Pedroza, Francisco C. Pelaes, Jose Perez, and Enrique Jesus Osorno
It is well established that “[a] criminal defendant is entitled to have instructions presented relating to any theory of defense for which there is any foundation in the evidence, no matter how weak or incredible that evidence may be.” United States v. O’Connor, 237 F.2d 466 , 474 n. 8 (2d Cir.1956); see United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 81 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); Barnes v. Jones, 665 F.2d 427, 435 (2d Cir.1981), rev’d on other grounds, 463 U.S. 745 , 103 S.Ct. 3308 , 77 L.Ed.2d 987 (1983); United States v. Alfonso-Perez, 535 F.2d 1362…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Albert Mast
See United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 84 (2d Cir.), cert. denied,U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cambodian Buddhist Society of Connecticut, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Ed. 2d 262 (2004), for example, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit concluded that, under existing first amendment jurisprudence, the zoning ordinances under review did not impose a substantial burden on local religious institutions because “they [did] not render impracticable the use of real property in [the jurisdiction] for religious exercise, much less discourage churches from locating or attempting to locate [there].” 16 Id., 761; see also Episcopal Student Foundation v. Ann Arbor, supra, 341 F. Sup. 2d 704 (religious exercise was not substantially burdened by denial of permi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Natural Gas Commodity Litigation
In re Application of Behar, 779 F.Supp. 273, 275 (S.D.N.Y.1991); see also, e.g., United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 78 (2d Cir.) (affirming the district court’s finding that party failed to overcome the privilege because the evidence sought would be cumulative of other impeachment evidence), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goodall v. Stafford County School Board
See Regan v. Taxation with Representation of Wash., 461 U.S. 540, 546 , 103 S.Ct. 1997, 2001 , 76 L.Ed.2d 129 (1983) (“We again reject the ‘notion that First Amendment rights are somehow not fully realized unless they are subsidized by the State.’ ” (quoting Cammarano v. United States, 358 U.S. 498, 515 , 79 S.Ct. 524, 535 , 3 L.Ed.2d 462 (1959), Douglas, J., concurring)); Rust v. Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173, 193 , 111 S.Ct. 1759, 1772 , 114 L.Ed.2d 233 (1991) (finding that a right is not infringed simply because the government chooses not to fund it); Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297, 317-18 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goodall v. Stafford County School Board
See Regan v. Taxation with Representation of Wash., 461 U.S. 540, 546 , 103 S.Ct. 1997, 2001 , 76 L.Ed.2d 129 (1983) ("We again reject the 'notion that First Amendment rights are somehow not fully realized unless they are subsidized by the State.' " (quoting Cammarano v. United States, 358 U.S. 498, 515 , 79 S.Ct. 524, 535 , 3 L.Ed.2d 462 (1959), Douglas, J., concurring)); Rust v. Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173, 193 , 111 S.Ct. 1759, 1772 , 114 L.Ed.2d 233 (1991) (finding that a right is not infringed simply because the government chooses not to fund it); Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297, 317-18 , 100 S.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Angelo Ruggiero, Gene Gotti and John Carneglia
See, e.g., United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 80 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); United States v. Valencia, 645 F.2d 1158, 1167 (2d Cir.1980); United States v. Brown, 582 F.2d 197, 202 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 289 , 58 L.Ed.2d 262 (1978); Robinson, 560 F.2d at 517 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pearson v. City of Grand Blanc
See also Lakewood, Ohio Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses, Inc. v. City of Lakewood, 699 F.2d 303 (6th Cir.) (citing Village of Euclid, supra) cert. denied 464 U.S. 815 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); Shelton v. City of College Station, 780 F.2d 475, 483 (5th Cir.) (“The key inquiry is whether the question is ‘at least debatable.’ ...
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State Ex Rel. Hudok v. Henry
See also United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); United States v. Cuthbertson, 630 F.2d 139 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1056 , 102 5.Ct. 604, 70 L.Ed.2d 594 (1981); LaRouche v. National Broadcasting Co., 780 F.2d 1134 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 818 , 107 S.Ct. 79 , 93 L.Ed.2d 34 (1986); Miller v. Transamerican Press, Inc., 621 F.2d 721 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1041 , 101 S.Ct. 1759 , 68 L.Ed.2d 238 (1981); CBS, Inc. v. Superior Court, 85 Cal.App.3d 241 , 149 Cal.Rptr. 421 (1978); Morgan v. …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Noel Alvarado and Mayra Sanabria
Id. at 1135 (emphasis added); see also United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 85 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Tobacco Company v. American Tobacco Company
Squibb & Sons, Inc., 740 F.2d at 559 (quotingEEOC v. University of Notre Dame du Lac, 715 F.2d 331, 338 (7th Cir.1983)) (brackets in Deitchman ); see also United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 77 (2d Cir.) (discussing balancing test to be applied where discovery requests implicate the reporters' qualified privilege), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mount Sinai School of Medicine v. American Tobacco Co.
Squibb & Sons, Inc., 740 F.2d at 559 (quoting EEOC v. University of Notre Dame du Lac, 715 F.2d 331, 338 (7th Cir.1983)) (brackets in Deitchman); see also United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 77 (2d Cir.) (discussing balancing test to be applied where discovery requests implicate the reporters’ qualified privilege), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Finley
See, e.g., United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); United States v. Serubo, 604 F.2d 807, 816 (3d Cir.1979); United States v. Waldbaum, Inc., 593 F.Supp. 967, 970 (E.D.N.Y.1984); United States v. Gold, 470 F.Supp. 1336, 1345 (N.D.Ill.1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Aillon
Id., 403 ; see also United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S. Ct. 72 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Golemis v. Kirby
See, e.g., Citadel Corporation v. Puerto Rico Highway Authority, 695 F.2d 31, 33 (1st Cir.1982) (“damage actions against governmental entities stemming from land use policies [are] not cognizable in a federal court”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 815 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Matter, Antoni Gronowicz
(2×)
See also United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70 (2d Cir.) (privilege extends to magazine’s “work papers”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Cameron
(2×)
See, e.g., Lakewood, Ohio Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses, Inc. v. City of Lakewood, 699 F.2d 303, 307 (6th Cir.1983), cert. den. 464 U.S. 815 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983) (ordinance banning church buildings from residential neighborhood expressly recognized to allow congregation to worship in the home of its members).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hatteras, Inc.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-1767.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1983.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.