green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.7 score
“ear need not be the consequence of a direct or implicit threat by the defendant. ...”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "but see"
United States v. Timothy Cofield
(4×)
also: Cited "see"
See, e.g., United States v. Barsanti, 943 F.2d 428, 434 (4th Cir.1991), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 1474 , 117 L.Ed.2d 618 (1992); United States v. Blecker, 657 F.2d 629, 632 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1016 , 71 L.Ed.2d 304 (1982); United States v. Brakke, 934 F.2d 174, 176-77 (8th Cir.1991); United States v. Ryan, 894 F.2d 355, 360 (10th Cir.1990); United States v. Griffin, 814 F.2d 806, 810 (1st Cir.1987); United States v. Chestnut, 533 F.2d 40, 46-48 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 829 , 97 S.Ct. 88 , 50 L.Ed.2d 93 (1976); but see United States v. B…
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Jerry Williams
(2×)
ear need not be the consequence of a direct or implicit threat by the defendant. ...
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Cedric Hayden, A/K/A Reginald James Wilder, United States of America v. Tomel K. Lucas, A/K/A Angelo Berlin, United States of America v. Reginald Eugene Hayden, A/K/A Bubba
See United States v. Billups, 692 F.2d 320, 330 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 820 , 104 S.Ct. 84 , 78 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983). 23 James argues that the evidence was unreliable as to the letter.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hayden
See United States v. Billups, 692 F.2d 320, 330 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 820 , 104 S.Ct. 84 , 78 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Smith
See Gragg v. State, 429 So.2d 1204 (Fla.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 820 , 104 S.Ct. 83 , 78 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Cardwell v. Sears Roebuck and Co.
See U.S. v. Billups, 692 F.2d 320, 330 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 820 , 104 S.Ct. 84 , 78 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Garcia v. State
See Gragg v. State, 429 So.2d 1204 (Fla.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 820 , 104 S.Ct. 83 , 78 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary Patrick Watford, United States of America v. Austin Carven Gant, A/K/A Joe, United States of America v. David Lee Williams
See United States v. Billups, 692 F.2d 320, 328 (4th Cir.1982) (evidence of other bribes admissible to show common plan or scheme in bribery prosecution), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 820 , 104 S.Ct. 84 , 78 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983); United States v. Powell, 407 F.2d 582, 585 (4th Cir.) (counterfeiting prosecution; evidence of prior instances where defendant passed counterfeit bills admissible to show common plan or scheme), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 966 , 89 S.Ct. 2113 , 23 L.Ed.2d 753 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tsafaroff v. Taylor (In re Taylor)
See Mesirow v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc., 703 F.2d 339, 345 (9th Cir.) (assuming without deciding that a client can appeal from an order imposing sanctions on his attorney), cert. denied 464 U.S. 820 , 104 S.Ct. 83 , 78 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: Ezella M. Taylor, Debtor. Dina Tsafaroff Evelyn Simbas v. Ezella M. Taylor, Ezella M. Taylor v. Dina Tsafaroff Evelyn Simbas William Little, William Little v. Ezella M. Taylor David A. Gill, Trustee in Bankruptcy
See Mesirow v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc., 703 F.2d 339, 345 (9th Cir.) (assuming without deciding that a client can appeal from an order imposing sanctions on his attorney), cert. denied 464 U.S. 820 , 104 S.Ct. 83 , 78 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony J. Bucci, Sr. And Ronald H. Glantz
See United States v. Billups, 692 F.2d 320, 330 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 820 , 104 S.Ct. 84 , 78 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983); see also United States v. Lisinski, 728 F.2d 887, 891 (7th Cir.1984); Hathaway, 534 F.2d at 395 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Alfred Covino, Cross-Appellee
See United States v. Billups, 692 F.2d 320, 330-31 (4th Cir.1982) (fear need not be consequence of direct or implicit threat by defendant, but need only be reasonable under circumstances), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 820 , 104 S.Ct. 84 , 78 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983); United States v. Duhon, 565 F.2d 345, 352 (5th Cir.) (intent to extort may be inferred from ambiguous statements), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 952 , 98 S.Ct. 1580 , 58 L.Ed.2d 802 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Waller
See Kaushiva v. Hutter, 454 A.2d 1373 (D.C.), cert. denied, [ 464 U.S. 820 ], 104 S.Ct. 83 [ 78 L.Ed.2d 93 ] (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Premier Wine & Spirits of South Dakota Inc. v. E. & J. Gallo Winery
See Mesirow v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc., 703 F.2d 339, 344 (9th Cir.1983) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 820 , 104 S.Ct. 83 , 78 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983), [affirming summary judgment for defendant; declarations submitted in opposition to summary judgment motion which contradict prior deposition testimony raise only “sham issues” and “do not create a factual dispute sufficient to avoid summary judgment”]. 17.
discussed
Cited "see"
Eavenson, Auchmuty & Greenwald, a Pennsylvania Professional Corporation v. Michael Holtzman Individually and as Trustee for Gibson, N v. Gibson, n.v.: A Netherlands Antilles Corporation Jacques Trempont, Individually and as Trustee for Gibson, N v. Claude A. Antille, Individually and as a Managing Director of Gibson, N v. John Doe Representing All of the Parties in Interest of Gibson, N v. Christoffer Smeets, Individually and as Director of Curacao Corp. Co. N v. Eugene Bruinendael, Individually and as Director of Curacao Corp. Co. N v. Henricul De Rooid, Individually and as Director of Curacao Corp. Co. N v. Cornelius Lind, Individually and as Director of Curacao Corp. Co. N v. V. Edward H. Greenwald, Sr., Edward H. Greenwald, Jr., William Sumner Scott, and Lebon Walker, Third-Party Appeal of William Sumner Scott
See infra at pp. 541-544 7 The Ninth Circuit has adopted a broad rule under which "[a]n order imposing a sanction upon counsel, a nonparty in the underlying action, is final and appealable by the person sanctioned, when the sanction is imposed." Optyl Eyewear Fashion International Corp. v. Style Companies, 760 F.2d 1045 , 1047 n. 1 (9th Cir.1985) (citing Mesirow v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc., 703 F.2d 339, 345 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 820 , 104 S.Ct. 83 , 78 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Newby Franklin Love, United States of America v. Newby Franklin Love, United States of America v. Robert Edward Lee, United States of America v. Sue Robinson Youngblood, United States of America v. Robert Edward Lee
See U.S. v. Billups, 692 F.2d 320, 327 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 84 , 78 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Love
See U.S. v. Billups, 692 F.2d 320, 327 (4th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 84 , 78 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rappaport
United States v. Opager and United States v. Batts, both supra; see generally, United States v. Billups, 692 F.2d 320 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 84 , 78 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983); United States v. Babbitt, 683 F.2d 21 (1st Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lacey
See, e.g. , Cohn , 160 P.3d at 342-43 (citing, inter alia , People v. Carroll , 140 Cal. App. 3d 135 , 189 Cal.Rptr. 327 , cert. den. , 464 U.S. 820 , 104 S.Ct. 83 , 78 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983) ; United States v. Mack , 362 F.3d 597 (9th Cir. 2004) ; United States v. Pina , 844 F.2d 1 , 15 (1st Cir. 1988) ("Removal of a defendant from the courtroom is more difficult when the defendant is acting pro se .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ryko Manufacturing Co. v. Eden Services, a Maryland Partnership, Fred J. Eden, Jr. And J. Erik Eden, Eden Services, Fred J. Eden, Jr. And J. Erik Eden v. Ryko Manufacturing Co., Ryko Manufacturing Co. v. Eden Services, a Maryland Partnership, Fred J. Eden and J. Erik Eden, Eden Services, Fred J. Eden, Jr. And J. Erik Eden v. Ryko Manufacturing Co.
See also Mesirow v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc., 703 F.2d 339, 342-43 (9th Cir.) (no resale price maintenance where defendant bore "significantly greater risks" in sales of goods through plaintiff distributors), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 820 , 104 S.Ct. 83 , 78 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983). 27 This analysis is limited to examining the distributor's role vis-a-vis transactions allegedly involving an antitrust violation.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ryko Manufacturing Co. v. Eden Services
See also Mesirow v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc., 703 F.2d 339, 342-43 (9th Cir.) (no resale price maintenance where defendant bore “significantly greater risks” in sales of goods through plaintiff distributors), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 820 , 104 S.Ct. 83 , 78 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nacher v. State
We must with realism and rationality ... `examine the record of a prior proceeding, taking into account the pleadings, evidence, charge, and other relevant matter, and conclude whether a rational jury could have grounded its verdict upon an issue other than that which the defendant seeks to foreclose from consideration.' 397 U.S. at 444 , 90 S.Ct. at 1194 (quoting Mayers & Yarbrough, Bis Vexari: New Trials and Successive Prosecutions, 74 Harv.L.Rev. 1, 38-39 (1960)); see also Gragg v. State, 429 So.2d 1204, 1206 (Fla. 1983), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 83 , 78 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983); Alvo…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Florida
v.
Gragg
v.
Gragg
No. 82-1927.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (2)
Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.