green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
11.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1996 ·
…when confronted with a demand for an offer of proof," questioner must "provide some good faith basis for questioning that alleges adverse facts
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hynes v. Coughlin
when confronted with a demand for an offer of proof," questioner must "provide some good faith basis for questioning that alleges adverse facts
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hynes v. Coughlin
when confronted with a demand for an offer of proof," questioner must "provide some good faith basis for questioning that alleges adverse facts
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Whitfield v. Cohen
courts have also recognized that in enacting erisa congress made more exacting the requirements of the common law of trusts relating to employee benefit trust funds.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Persico
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
The district court allowed the testimony on the ground that Cardinale’s testimony as to her statements was nonhearsay under Fed.R.Evid. 801, as it was offered simply for “the fact that she made these accusations” and was admissible because “[t]he rest of the testimony doesn’t make any particular sense unless you have the chronology [of] how it occurred that Mr. DeRoss became aware of it” (Tr. 280; see id. at 281).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. James Payton, AKA James Perkins, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See generally United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 778-79 (2d Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Newton
People v. Moore, supra; see United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769 (2d Cir.1983), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shillinger v. Haworth
See Briggs v. Goodwin, 698 F.2d 486 , 493 n. 22 (D.C.Cir.) (noting that "[a] deliberate attempt by the government to obtain defense strategy information or to otherwise interfere with the attorney-defendant relationship through the use of an undercover agent may constitute a per se violation of the Sixth Amendment"), reh'g granted, opinion vacated, and on reh'g, 712 F.2d 1444 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984); United States v. Morales, 635 F.2d 177, 179 (2d Cir.1980) ("[B]ecause the ... evidence ... does not disclose an intentional, governmenta…
discussed
Cited "see"
Shillinger v. Haworth
See Briggs v. Goodwin, 698 F.2d 486 , 493 n. 22 (D.C.Cir.) (noting that “[a] deliberate attempt by the government to obtain defense strategy information or to otherwise interfere with the attorney-defendant relationship through the use of an undercover agent may constitute a per se violation of the Sixth Amendment”), reh’g granted, opinion vacated, and on reh’g, 712 F.2d 1444 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984); United States v. Morales, 635 F.2d 177, 179 (2d Cir.1980) (“[Bjecause the ... evidence ... does not disclose an intentional, g…
cited
Cited "see"
Hook v. State of Ariz.
See Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226, 1240 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mason Tenders Dist. Council of Greater NY
See Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir.1983) (“reliance on counsel’s advice, without more, cannot be a complete defense to an imprudence charge”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984); Katsaros v. Cody, 568 F.Supp. 360 , 369 n. 12 (E.D.N.Y.1983) (“the retention of counsel ... does not relieve a fiduciary of his duty to investigate”), aff'd, 744 F.2d 270 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Mason
See United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769 (2nd Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Reid v. New Hampshire
See Briggs v. Goodwin, 712 F.2d 1444 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984) (prosecutor who gives peijured testimony is entitled to absolute immunity under Briscoe but not Imbler). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Carson Friend Collene Friend Brad Friend Trav Friend Carson Lighting, Inc. Carson Lighting, Defined Benefit Pension Plan v. Sanwa Bank California
(2×)
See Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984); Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Malaki Shakur Latine, A/K/A Gregory Latine v. Louis F. Mann, Superintendent, Shawangunk Correctional Facility
See United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 775 (2d Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gerald G. Roth Logan M. Ammon v. Sawyer-Cleator Lumber Company, Employee Stock Ownership Plan Charles J. Sawyer Clifford E. Sawyer
See id. (asking whether “ ‘trustees, at the time they engaged in the challenged transactions, employed the appropriate methods to investigate the merits of the investment and to structure the investment’ ”) (quoting Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226, 1232 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling Consultants
In Whittaker Corp. v. Execuair Corp., 953 F.2d 510, 516 (9th Cir.1992), the Ninth Circuit held that civil contempt could be used to coerce defendants into posting a bond because such an order "imposed a duty to post security, not a duty to pay a judgment....” Id.; accord Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226 , 1239 n. 9 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richmark Corp., a California Corporation v. Timber Falling Consultants, an Oregon Corporation, Timber Falling Consultants, an Oregon Corporation, Counterclaim v. Richmark Corp., a California Corporation, Peacock Mfg. Co., a Texas Corporation, Zhu Yuanchang, Eugene Wang, James Yang, and Francis Tong, Counterclaim and Beijing Ever Bright Industrial Co., a Foreign Corporation, Counterclaim
In Whittaker Corp. v. Execuair Corp., 953 F.2d 510, 516 (9th Cir.1992), the Ninth Circuit held that civil contempt could be used to coerce defendants into posting a bond because such an order "imposed a duty to post security, not a duty to pay a judgment...." Id.; accord Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226 , 1239 n. 9 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Aclu Foundation of Southern California v. William P. Barr
See Briggs v. Goodwin, 698 F.2d 486 (D.C.Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 712 F.2d 1444 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Elijah Albert Boone, Dehlia E. Boone, Jerry Boone and Roger Swayze
(3×)
See United States v. Schmidt, 711 F.2d 595, 597 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1041 , 104 S.Ct. 705 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Thomas Cosgrove, Husband, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Matilda June Cosgrove, Wife, on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Circle K Corporation, a Texas Corporation, Circle K Convenience Stores, Inc., a Texas Corporation Fred Hervey, Thomas Cosgrove, Husband, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Matilda June Cosgrove, Wife, on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Circle K Corporation, a Texas Corporation, Circle K Convenience Stores, Inc., a Texas Corporation Fred Hervey, Millard O. Orick, Bill J. Farmer, Robert Hutchinson, Fred Hervey Interests Employees Retirement Plan, Thomas Cosgrove, Husband, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Matilda June Cosgrove, Wife, on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Valley National Bank, and Charles Shoumaker, Karl Eller, H.R. Fenstermacher, W.A. Franke, Dean P. Guerin, John P. Harbin, Carl H. Lindner, Keith E. Lindner, Robert M. Reade, A. Jerry Busby, Jane Doe Shoumaker, Wife, Jane Doe Eller, Wife, Jane Doe Fenstermacher, Wife, Jane Doe, Wife, Jane Doe Guerin, Wife, Jane Doe Harbin, Wife, Jane Doe Lindner, Wife to Keith E. Lindner, Jane Doe Reade, Wife
See Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir.1983) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984) (proposition not stated, but court's discussion appears to assume it).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary Keith Vernor
See United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 775 (2d Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Pension Fund-Mid Jersey Trucking Industry-Local 701 v. Omni Funding Group
See Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 L.Ed.2d 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Casamento
See United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 777 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Casamento
See United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 777 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ellery Queen
See United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769 , 776 n. 7 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3148 (district court has jurisdiction to impose sanctions for violation of a post-conviction release condition); Fed.R.Crim.P. 36 (district court has jurisdiction to correct clerical errors in record).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blackwell v. Transamerica Occidental Life
See Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226, 1233-35 (9th Cir.1983) (trustees breached duty under ERISA by negligently selecting unqualified consultant), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1983); Kaszuk v. Bakery and Confectionary Union, 638 F.Supp. 365, 371 (N.D.Ill.1984) (liability for failure to comply with notice provisions of Fund), aff'd, 791 F.2d 548 (7th Cir.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Behre v. Thomas
See Briggs v. Goodwin, 712 F.2d 1444, 1448-49 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hernandez
While we agree with the defendant that the trial court improperly determined that it must evaluate the credibility of the in-court witness; see United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 777 (2d Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S. Ct. 704 , 79 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Riad Youssef Rahme
See United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 778 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Donovan v. Walton
(2×)
No. 93-1280, 93rd Cong., 2nd Sess., reprinted in 1974 U.S.Code Cong. & Ad.News at 5083; accord Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226, 1231 (9th Cir.1983), cert, denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Mrs. Susie Lite Morrison v. City of Baton Rouge
See Briggs v. Goodwin, 712 F.2d 1444 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ted Katsaros, John Kuebler, Robert Trott, Lawrence Kudla, and Charles Curd, as Participants in the Teamsters Local 282 Pension Trust Fund, Plaintiffs v. John Cody, Robert Sasso, John Dee, William Argento, Ralph Guercia, Herbert Schneider and Louis Nappi, as Trustees of the Teamsters Local 282 Pension Trust Fund, Anthony G. Angelos, C.J. Bassler, Jr., Jonathan T. Howe, Clarence L. Jensen, Lambrose Karkazis, James C. Kirie, James Kokonas, and James Verros, Third Party-Defendants, Local 282 International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehouseman and Helpers of America, Michael Carbone, Michael Bourgal, Joseph Mattarazzo and Edward Silvera, Intervenors. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff v. John Cody, William Argento, John Dee, Ralph Guercia, Louis G. Nappi, Robert Sasso, and Herbert Schneider, and the Teamsters Local 282 Pension Trust Fund, John Cody, William Argento, John Dee, Ralph Guercia, Louis G. Nappi, Robert Sasso, and Herbert Schneider, John Cody, William Argento, John Dee, Ralph Guercia, Louis G. Nappi, Robert Sasso, and Herbert Schneider, Third Party v. Anthony G. Angelos, C.J. Bassler, Jr., Jonathan T. Howe, Clarence L. Jensen, Lambrose Karkazis, James C. Kirie, James Kokonas, Anton A. Smigiel, James Verros and Herbert C. Wenske, Third Party
See Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226, 1237 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 722 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984)(appointment of investment manager to oversee pension fund for 10 years approved on condition that non-investment functions would be performed by trustees). 49 The intervenor Local 282 argues that the asset manager chosen by the district court, Albert Lewis, is not a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 as required by the ERISA statute 11 and that therefore he is not qualified to serve as an asset manager.
discussed
Cited "see"
Donovan v. Schmoutey
See Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226, 1232 (9th Cir.1983) (failure to ascertain the identity and value of the security of a loan is a breach of the fiduciary duties under ERISA), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984); Freund v. Marshall & Ilsley Bank, 485 F.Supp. 629, 636 (W.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Katsaros v. Cody
See Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226, 1237 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 722 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984)(appoinment of investment manager to oversee pension fund for 10 years approved on condition that non-investment functions would be performed by trustees).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Myers v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
See, e.g., Superior Oil Co. v. Pioneer Corp., 706 F.2d 603, 605-06 (5th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1041 , 104 *589 S.Ct. 706, 79 L.Ed.2d 171 (1984); Cox v. International Union of Operating Engineers, 672 F.2d 421 (5th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Erazo, Alex
WIGMORE, WIGMORE ON EVIDENCE § 443, at 528-29 (Tillers rev. 1983); see also United States v. Schmidt, 711 F.2d 595, 598-99 (5th Cir. 1983)(trial court did not err in excluding psycholinguistics expert's testimony offered to prove defendant did not knowingly and willfully utter purportedly false statements to grand jury because evidence would have confused issues and made complex a simple issue easily comprehensible to jury), cenm denied, 464 U.S. 1041 (1984): United States v. Michelena-Orovio, 702 F.2d 496, 499-500 (5th Cir. 1983Xtrial court did not err in denying defendant's request to have …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rivera
State v. Meehan, 260 Conn. 372, 381 , 796 A.2d 1191 (2002); see also United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 777 (2d Cir. 1983) (“to require a preliminary assessment of the in-court witness’ credibility would ... be a usurpation of the jury function”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S. Ct. 704 , 79 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Archambault
Queen, 847 F.2d at 350 ; United States v. Weber, No. 95-00125-03-CR-W-8, 1997 WL 61442 at **1-2 (W.D.Mo.1997); see also United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 776, n. 7 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tyson v. Keane
(2×)
(Id. at 2-3.) United States v. Kupau, 781 F.2d 740, 745 (9th Cir.) (no error to exclude expert discourse analysis where the “expert sought to interpret language in ordinary usage, which the district court found would have confused, not assisted, the jury.”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 823 , 107 S.Ct. 93 , 93 L.Ed.2d 45 (1986); United States v. DeLuna, 763 F.2d 897, 912 (8th Cir.) (district court properly excluded linguistic discourse analysis expert testimony that would confuse jurors rather than assist them), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 980 , 106 S.Ct. 382 , 88 L.Ed.2d 336 (1985); see also United …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Lee Matthews and Robert G. Prater
Compare United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 776 (2d Cir.1983) (suggesting that statements against penal interest may “fall within a ‘firmly rooted hearsay exception’ ”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984), with United States v. Bakhtiar, 994 F.2d at 977-78 (suggesting that more recent cases in the Supreme Court and other Circuits have cast doubt on whether penal-interest exception is firmly rooted).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Millan-Colon
See 836 F.Supp. at 1013 (citing United States v. Concepcion, 983 F.2d 369, 392 (2d Cir.1992) (trial court’s preclusion of defendant’s cross-examination of government witness upheld where proposed cross-examination involved speculation that informant committed a murder), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 163 , 126 L.Ed.2d 124 (1993)); see also United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 778-79 (2d Cir.1983) (trial court properly precluded cross-examination where defense counsel was unable to show a good faith basis for proposed line of questioning), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Graham v. Hoke
Schneble, 405 U.S. at 432 , 92 S.Ct. at 1060 (quoting Harrington, 395 U.S. at 254 , 89 S.Ct. at 1728 ); see also Tamilio v. Fogg, 713 F.2d 18, 21 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1041 , 104 S.Ct. 706 , 79 L.Ed.2d 170 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Graham v. Hoke
Schneble, 405 U.S. at 432 , 92 S.Ct. at 1060 (quoting Harrington, 395 U.S. at 254 , 89 S.Ct. at 1728 ); see also Tamilio v. Fogg, 713 F.2d 18, 21 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1041 , 104 S.Ct. 706 , 79 L.Ed.2d 170 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Franchise Tax Board of California v. Alcan Aluminium Ltd.
See also EMI Ltd. v. Bennett, 738 F. 2d 994, 997 (CA9), cert. denied, 469 U. S. 1073 (1984) (following Graves)', Alcan Aluminum Ltd. v. Franchise Tax Bd., 558 F. Supp. 624, 626-629 (SDNY), aff’d, 742 F. 2d 1430 (CA2 1983), cert. denied, 464 U. S. 1041 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Franchise Tax Board of California v. Alcan Aluminium Ltd.
See also EMI Ltd. v. Bennett, 738 F. 2d 994, 997 (CA9), cert. denied, 469 U. S. 1073 (1984) (following Graves)', Alcan Aluminum Ltd. v. Franchise Tax Bd., 558 F. Supp. 624, 626-629 (SDNY), aff’d, 742 F. 2d 1430 (CA2 1983), cert. denied, 464 U. S. 1041 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Paul C. Schaefer v. Arkansas Medical Society
See, e.g., Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226, 1231-32 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Schaefer v. Arkansas Medical Society
See, e.g., Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226, 1231-32 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richardson (In Re Richardson)
See, e.g., Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226, 1240 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984), to the effect that alleged contemners “b(ear) the burden of demonstrating that they were unable to comply” and that “(t)o satisfy this burden the individual appellants were required to show ‘categorically and in detail’ why they were unable to to comply with the court’s previous order.” Any other rule would defy reason and common sense.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Attorney General of the United States v. Irish People, Inc.
See, e.g., Briggs v. Goodwin, 698 F.2d 486, 491 , vacated on another issue on reh’g, 712 F.2d 1444 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984); Patrick v. LeFevre, 745 F.2d 153, 159 (2d Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fred Oliver, Cross-Appellants v. Trunkline Gas Company, Cross-Appellee
See, e.g., Superior Oil Co. v. Pioneer Corp., 706 F.2d 603, 605-06 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1041 , 104 S.Ct. 706 , 79 L.Ed.2d 171 (1984); Cox v. International Union of Operating Engineers, 672 F.2d 421 (5th Cir.1982). 1 As we pointed out in Superior Oil, the federal statutes imposing “price ceilings do not give the gas producer a federal right to receive a particular price for its gas.” 706 F.2d at 606 (citation omitted) (emphasis in original).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
City of Mission, South Dakota
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-606.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (2) · S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.