green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.4 score
“the determination of whether the admission of the hearsay statements violated haggin's sixth amendment right to confrontation is a question of law, which involves the application of legal principles to historical facts”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Theodore Robert Bundy v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary Department of Corrections, State of Florida
the determination of whether the admission of the hearsay statements violated haggin's sixth amendment right to confrontation is a question of law, which involves the application of legal principles to historical facts
discussed
Cited "see"
Green v. State
See Mishmash v. State, 423 So.2d 446 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), review denied, 434 So.2d 889 (Fla. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 980 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984). [2] See also Harvey v. State, 390 So.2d 484 , 485 n. 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brian T. Ellzey
See Tapia v. Tansy, 926 F.2d 1554, 1557 (10th Cir.1990) (review Confrontation Clause claims de novo, citing Haggins v. Warden, Fort Pillow State Farm, 715 F.2d 1050, 1055 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 980 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. Guenther
“However, the conclusion ... that the hearsay statements are reliable is a mixed question of law and fact, and hence is reviewed de novo.” Myatt v. Hannigan, 910 F.2d 680, 685 (10th Cir.1990); see Haggins v. Warden, Fort Pillow State Farm, 715 F.2d 1050, 1055 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 980 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Elton John Myatt v. Robert Hannigan and the Attorney General of the State of Kansas
See Haggins v. Warden, Fort Pillow State Farm, 715 F.2d 1050, 1055 (6th Cir.1983) (“whether the admission of the child’s statements violated the confrontation clause ... [is a] determination ] of law, subject to collateral review by the federal courts”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 980 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984); cf. Sumner v. Mata II, 455 U.S. 591, 597 , 102 S.Ct. 1303, 1306 , 71 L.Ed.2d 480 (1982) (the ultimate question of the constitutionality of identification procedures is not subject to a presumption of correctness under § 2254); Martinez v. Sullivan, 881 F.2d 921, 925-26…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. One 1987 Ford F-350 4× 4 Pickup
See U.S. v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 708 F.2d 444, 450 (9th Cir.1983) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 981 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984) (court avoids deciding contention that federal seizure was done without a warrant and without due process because the “ ‘mere fact of the illegal seizure, standing alone, does not immunize the goods from forfeiture,’ ” quoting U.S. v. One 1971 Harley-Davidson Motorcycle, 508 F.2d 351 (9th Cir.1974) (per curiam)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. One 1986 Mercedes Benz
See United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 708 F.2d 444, 449-50 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 981 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984). 8 Finally, at oral argument, Parker argued that forfeiture of the Mercedes could not be predicated on the transportation of such a small quantity of marijuana, since under New York law the possession of less than 25 grams of marijuana has been decriminalized.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. One 1986 Mercedes Benz, VIN WDBEA30D2GA143459
See United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 708 F.2d 444, 449-50 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 981 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harry C. Murray v. Commercial Union Insurance Company
Gooding v. Warner-Lambert Co., 744 F.2d 354 , 357 n. 4 (3d Cir.1984); accord United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 708 F.2d 444, 451 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 981 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Murray v. Commercial Union Insurance
Gooding v, Warner-Lambert Co., 744 F.2d 354 , 357 n. 4 (3d Cir.1984); accord United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 708 F.2d 444, 451 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S. Ct. 981 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
McAninch v. Traders National Bank
See United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 708 F.2d 444, 451 (9th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 981 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
John Charles McAninch of the Estate of John W. McAninch George Droege Mrs. Chester Thompson and Jerald A. Thompson, D/B/A Thompson & Sons Don J. Gatens John v. Hansen Kendall Oden Paul Bettin Earl Galloway James R. Miksch Ralph Debruin Ed Crall Frank Dirks Fred Olson Orval L. Miller Frank Rhodenbaugh and Albia Sales Company, Inc. v. Traders National Bank of Kansas City, John Charles McAninch of the Estate of John W. McAninch George Droege Mrs. Chester Thompson and Jerald A. Thompson, D/B/A Thompson & Sons Don J. Gatens John v. Hansen Kendall Oden Paul Bettin Earl Galloway James R. Miksch Ralph Debruin Ed Crall Frank Dirks Fred Olson Orval L. Miller Frank Rhodenbaugh and Albia Sales Company, Inc. v. John H. Kreamer William L. Turner Gage & Tucker Wayne H. Hoecker George Coughlin Thomas J. Guilfoil and General Bancshares Corporation
See United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 708 F.2d 444, 451 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 981 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mark Creekmore v. District Court of the Eighth Judicial District of the State of Montana, in and for the County of Cascade
See Haggins v. Warden, Fort Pillow State Farm, 715 F.2d 1050 (6th Cir.1983) (failure to exhaust frivolous claim does not bar consideration of petitioner’s other claims and court treated claim as stricken), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 980 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thirteen Thousand Dollars in United States Currency
See United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 708 F.2d 444, 447 (9th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 981 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984); United States v. $83,320 In United States Currency, 682 F.2d 573, 576-77 (6th Cir.1982); United States v. $364,960.00 In United States Currency, 661 F.2d 319, 323-25 (5th Cir. 1981); United States v. One 1972 Toyota Mark II VIN RT 63016188, 505 F.2d 1162, 1164 (8th Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Troy P.
(2×)
See, e.g., Haggins v. Warden, Fort Pillow State Farm, 715 F.2d 1050, 1057-58 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 980 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984); United States v. Iron Shell, 633 F.2d 77, 85-86 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1001 , 101 S.Ct. 1709 , 68 L.Ed.2d 203 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nelson v. Ferrey
See also Haggins v. Warden, Fort Pillow State Farm, 715 F.2d 1050 (6th Cir.1983) (excited utterances of four-year-old victim admitted even though she was ruled incompetent to testify by state trial judge), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 980 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph A. Puleio v. George A. Vose, Jr., Etc.
See also Haggins v. Warden, Fort Pillow State Farm, 715 F.2d 1050, 1057 (6th Cir.1983) (the issue on federal habeas review is not “whether the statements are admissible under the state evidentiary rules”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 980 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984); Olson v. Green, 668 F.2d 421 , 428 n. 12 (8th Cir.1982) (“state court’s interpretation of its own rules of evidence is binding” upon federal court).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Caputo, Fiore, A/K/A \Curly\". Appeal of Fiore Caputo"
(2×)
See, e.g., Haggins v. Warden, 715 F.2d 1050, 1055 (6th Cir.1983) (excited utterance), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 980 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984); Hutchins v. Wainwright, 715 F.2d 512, 516 (11th Cir.1983) (statement of anonymous informant to police), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 1427 , 79 L.Ed.2d 751 (1984); United States v. Washington, 688 F.2d 953, 959 (5th Cir.1982) (business records); Lenza v. Wyrick, 665 F.2d 804, 810-11 (8th Cir.1981) ("state of mind" exception); Williams v. Melton, 733 F.2d 1492, 1496 (11th Cir.) ("res gestae" exception), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 10…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gold Mountain Coffee, Ltd.
See also United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 708 F.2d 444, 450 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 981 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984); Interbartolo v. United States, 303 F.2d 34, 38-39 (1st Cir.1962); Fraser, Actions In Rem, 34 CORNELL L.Q. 29, 38 (1948).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mishmash
v.
Florida
v.
Florida
No. 83-5541.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 16, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1)
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.