green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.0 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Francke v. United States Department of Treasury
stewart held that ... no bfoq was necessary to justify the maximum age entry requirements for federal law enforcement officers.
cited
Cited "see"
Zeller v. Consolini
See Litton Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 700 F.2d 785, 809-12 (2d Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S. Ct. 984 , 79 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dutton v. Johnson County Board of County Commissioners
(2×)
See E.E.O.C. v. Los Angeles County, 531 F.Supp. 122 (C.D.Cal.1982) (denying stay pending appeal in age discrimination case), aff'd, 706 F.2d 1039 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Link v. City of Lewistown
See E.E.O.C. v. County of Los Angeles (9th Cir.1983), 706 F.2d 1039, 1043 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 .
cited
Cited "see"
The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Federal Communications Commission, American Telephone and Telegraph Co., Intervenors
See Litton Sys. v. AT & T, 700 F.2d 785 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sylvia Evans v. City of Chicago, Bertha Balark v. City of Chicago, Curtis Collum, Cross-Appellants v. City of Chicago, Cross-Appellees
See Litton Systems v. AT & T, 746 F.2d 168 , 175 (2d Cir.) (new rate not retroactive and it does not apply to cases pending at that date on direct review), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984); United States v. Dollar Rent A Car Systems, Inc., 712 F.2d 938 , 940 n. 5 (4th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Weber v. State
See Nerison v. Solem, 715 F.2d 415, 416-17 (8th Cir.1983) (trial before judge who had accepted guilty plea that had been subsequently vacated), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1072 , 104 S.Ct. 983 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984); State v. Walker, 166 A.2d 567, 573 (N.J. 1960) (trial before judge who had accepted non vult plea and denied writ of habeas corpus).
discussed
Cited "see"
Disenos Artisticos E Industriales, S.A. v. Work
See California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited, 404 U.S. 508 , 92 S.Ct. 609 , 30 L.Ed.2d 642 (1972); United Mineworkers of America v. Pennington, 381 U.S. 657 , 85 S.Ct. 1585 , 14 L.Ed.2d 626 (1965); Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc., 365 U.S. 127 , 81 S.Ct. 523 , 5 L.Ed.2d 464 (1961); see generally Litton Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 700 F.2d 785, 806-09 (2d Cir.1983) (discussing doctrine), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Ball Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Mutual Hospital Insurance, Inc.
See Litton Systems, Inc. v. AT&T, 700 F.2d 785 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Ball Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Mutual Hospital Insurance
See Litton Systems, Inc. v. AT&T, 700 F.2d 785 (2d Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jose E. MUNIZ RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. PUERTO RICO FIRE SERVICES, Et Al., Defendants, Appellants
Accord EEOC v. County of Los Angeles, 706 F.2d 1039, 1042 (9th Cir.1983) (“Courts cannot assume, in the absence of any evidence as to its effects on safe performance, that age, per se, constitutes a BFOQ” (quoting EEOC v. County of Santa Barbara, 666 F.2d 373 , 376 (9th Cir.1982))), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Revlon, Inc. v. Carson Products Co.
Even if Mr. Eiermann could be considered a quasi-judicial officer — a conclusion we find very doubtful — it is well-settled by law that whether “the [investigatory] proceedings could also be labeled a ‘quasi-judicial hearing’ is of no consequence in this regard.” United States v. School District of Ferndale, 577 F.2d 1339, 1354 (6th Cir.1978) (findings of an HEW Hearing Examiner in prior proceeding admissible); see Litton Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 700 F.2d 785, 818 (2d Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, _ U.S. _, 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984) (various FC…
cited
Cited "see"
Bonjorno, Joseph A. v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation
See Litton Systems v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 700 F.2d 785, 822-23 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Bonjorno v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
See Litton Systems v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 700 F.2d 785, 822-23 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Capital Telephone Company, Inc. v. New York Telephone Company
See Litton Systems, Inc. v. AT & T, 487 F.Supp. 942 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd on other grounds, 700 F.2d 785 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984) (district court discussed compulsion, but based decision on alternative grounds as well; this Court never reached issue); New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. F.E.R.C., 638 F.2d 388 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Capital Telephone Co. v. New York Telephone Co.
See Litton Systems, Inc. v. AT & T, 487 F.Supp. 942 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd on other grounds, 700 F.2d 785 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984) (district court discussed compulsion, but based decision on alternative grounds as well; this Court never reached issue); New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. F.E.R.C., 638 F.2d 388 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cresta
In the second place, the federal wiretap statute contains a specific exception to the general prohibition against electronic interception where a party to a communication has given “prior consent” to such interception. 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (2)(c); see United States v. Miller, 720 F.2d 227, 228 (1st Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984); United States v. Sanford, 673 F.2d 1070, 1072 (9th Cir.1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jack Faucett Associates, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co.
(2×)
See Litton Systems, Inc. v. AT & T, 700 F.2d 785, 791 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
International Wood Processors v. Power Dry, Inc.
See Litton Systems Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 700 F.2d 785 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United States
See Litton Systems, Inc. v. AT & T, 91 F.R.D. 574, 578 (S.D.N.Y.1981), aff'd, 700 F.2d 785 , 827-28 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984) (upholding denial under Rule 37 of costs and attorneys’ fees of over $10 million to which plaintiff otherwise entitled as a matter of law).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Parmalat Securities Litigation
Fed.R.Evid. 602; see also Thomas v. Stone Container Corp., 922 F.Supp. 950, 957 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (citing Litton Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 700 F.2d 785, 816-17 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984)). 156 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sonya Evette Singleton
See United States v. Cervantes-Pacheco, 826 F.2d 310, 315 (5th Cir.1987) (“It is difficult to imagine a greater motivation to lie than the inducement of a reduced sentence ____”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026 , 108 S.Ct. 749 , 98 L.Ed.2d 762 (1988); Schwartz, 785 F.2d at 680 (“A violation of trust which is influenced by the offer of an intangible service is no less damaging ... than if the influence was in the form of a cash kickback.”); United States v. Meinster, 619 F.2d 1041, 1045 (4th Cir.1980) (“We think it obvious that promises of immunity or leniency premised on cooperation in …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lewis v. Velez
Gentile v. County of Suffolk, 926 F.2d 142, 148 (2d Cir.1991); Perrin v. Anderson, 784 F.2d 1040, 1046-47 (10th Cir.1986); see also Litton Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 700 F.2d 785, 818-19 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984); Anderson v. City of New York, 657 F.Supp. 1571, 1578 (S.D.N.Y.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Peter Noone
Turner v. Fair, 617 F.2d 7, 10 (1st Cir.1980) (quoting United States v. Rogers, 475 F.2d 821, 827 (7th Cir.1973)) (emphasis added); see also United States v. Kimble, 719 F.2d 1253, 1257 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984); United States v. Seifert, 648 F.2d 557, 562 (9th Cir.1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch Inc.
See, e.g., Litton Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, 700 F.2d 785, 813-14 (2d Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984). 26 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Burlington Northern, Inc., Burlington Northern Railroad Co., Union Pacific Corp., Union Pacific Railroad Co., Missouri Pacific Railroad Co., Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc., Kansas City Southern Railway Co. & Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.
See Clipper Exxpress, 690 F.2d at 1255 ; see also Litton Systems, Inc. v. AT & T, 700 F.2d 785, 810 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984); Grip-Pak, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc., 694 F.2d 466, 472 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2430 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1983); City of Gainesville v. Florida Power & Light Co., 488 F.Supp. 1258, 1265-66 (S.D.Fla.1980); P. Areeda & H.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Burlington Northern, Inc.
See Clipper Exxpress, 690 F.2d at 1255 ; see also Litton Systems, Inc. v. AT & T, 700 F.2d 785, 810 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984); Grip-Pak, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc., 694 F.2d 466, 472 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2430 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1983); City of Gainesville v. Florida Power & Light Co., 488 F.Supp. 1258, 1265-66 (S.D.Fla.1980); P. Areeda & H.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony Viera
(2×)
See also United States v. Kimble, 719 F.2d 1253, 1257 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984), quoting Fountain v. United States, 384 F.2d 624, 628 (5th Cir.1967) ("[T]he relevant question on review is 'whether defendant's inability to make the inquiry created a substantial danger of prejudice by depriving him of the ability to test the truth of the witness' direct testimony.' "). 16 In this case, appellant was able to disclose to the jury by various means all the information he had wanted to present through cross-examination of King. 1 King's incons…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Anderson Davis, Jr., Leo Glen Nash and William A. Tyer
This Court will uphold a jury verdict in a criminal case so long as “there is substantial evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the Government, to uphold the jury’s decision.” United States v. Malatesta, 590 F.2d 1379, 1382 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979) (quoting Burks v. United States, 437 U.S. 1, 17 , 98 S.Ct. 2141, 2150 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1 (1978)); see also United States v. Kimble, 719 F.2d 1253, 1256 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph A. Iervolino v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
(2×)
Compare EEOC v. County of Los Angeles, 706 F.2d 1039, 1042 (9th Cir.1983) (economic considerations cannot be considered in BFOQ defense), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984); Orzel v. City of Wauwatosa Fire Dept., 697 F.2d 743, 755 (7th Cir.) (economic factors such as "the need to have a definite and financially feasible age upon which a retirement benefit formula could be based” cannot be the basis for BFOQ defense), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 992 , 104 S.Ct. 484 , 78 L.Ed.2d 680 (1983); Smallwood v. United Air Lines, 661 F.2d 303 , 308 (4th Cir.1981) (airline ca…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rosenthal
See also the case of United States v. Kimble, 719 F.2d 1253 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984), in which the court held that the specifics of the agreement went to the weight of the testimony and not its admissibility.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harold Joseph Rosenthal, Philip Anthony Bonadonna, Robert Edward Dunleavy, Jr., George Lombardi, Garland Hubert Watson, Larry Roger Stewart, Joseph Vincent Junker, United States of America v. Rose Marie Junker, United States of America v. Dennis Wayne Wilson
See also the case of United States v. Kimble, 719 F.2d 1253 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984), in which the court held that the specifics of the agreement went to the weight of the testimony and not its admissibility.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James D. Baresh
See also United States v. Kimble, 719 F.2d 1253 (5th Cir.1983) ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984); United States v. Merida, 765 F.2d 1205, 1216 , reh. denied 770 F.2d 164 (5th Cir.1985) (Limitations on scope of cross examination reviewable for abuse of discretion).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Suzanne M. Hahn, and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee v. The City of Buffalo, a Municipal Corporation
Compare EEOC v. County of Los Angeles, 706 F.2d 1039, 1042-44 (9th Cir.1983) (age 35 not a BFOQ for deputy sheriffs), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984), and EEOC v. County of Allegheny, 705 F.2d 679, 680-81 (3d Cir.1983) (age 35 not a BFOQ for county police officers), with EEOC v. Missouri State Highway Patrol, 555 F.Supp. 97, 106 (W.D.Mo.1982) (age 32 a BFOQ for highway patrol officers).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
St. Joseph's Hospital, Inc. v. Hospital Authority of America
Compare Litton Systems v. AT & T, 487 F.Supp. 942 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd, 700 F.2d *830 785, 809-12 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984) (Defendant’s allegedly misleading tariffs filed for some seven years with federal and state agencies, thus delaying FCC’s ultimate rejection of same, constituted an antitrust offense).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nerison
v.
Solem, Warden
v.
Solem, Warden
No. 83-5804.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 16, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.