green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.7 score
“of course, the business judgment rule is inapplicable ... when the directors' judgment ... is the product of self-dealing....”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Anderson v. Brokers, Inc. (In Re Brokers, Inc.)
of course, the business judgment rule is inapplicable ... when the directors' judgment ... is the product of self-dealing....
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kaplan v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
See also Weiss v. Temporary Investment Fund, Inc., 516 F.Supp. 665 , 667 n. 4 (D.Del.1981) (citing Shlensky, supra), aff'd, 692 F.2d 928 (3d Cir.1982), vacated on other grounds, 465 U.S. 1001 , 104 S.Ct. 989 , 79 L.Ed.2d 224 (1984); Recchion v. Westinghouse Electrical Corp., 606 F.Supp. 889, 896 (W.D.Pa.1985) (same). 4 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Van Dissel
v.
Jersey Central Power & Light Co.
v.
Jersey Central Power & Light Co.
No. 81-2065.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 23, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: M.D. North Carolina (1)
Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 464 U. S. 238 (1984).