green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.2 score
“kirkland lieutenants”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Earl Billish, John Carasotti, Martin Dunne, Richard A. Graf, John Herling, Edward Jaquszewski, Dennis R. Smith, Henry Scavone and John Schmidt v. City of Chicago and Louis T. Galante, Individually and Officially, Chicago Fire Fighters Union, Local No. 2, John M. Craven and Larry W. Anoman v. Richard M. Daley, Louis T. Galante and Jesse Hoskins, Nos. 90-1650, 90-2182
But see Kirkland v. New York State Dep't of Correctional Servs., 711 F.2d 1117 , 1131 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 997 , 79 L.Ed.2d 230 (1984). 12 In his letters to Commissioner Galante, Personnel Commissioner Hoskins followed his recitation of the underrepresentation statistics with an explanation of the litigation history.
cited
Cited "but see"
Billish v. City of Chicago
But see Kirkland v. New York State Dep’t of Correctional Servs., 711 F.2d 1117 , 1131 (2d Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 997 , 79 L.Ed.2d 230 (1984). .
discussed
Cited "but see"
1010 Potomac Associates v. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.
But see Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 711 F.2d 1117, 1126 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 997 , 79 L.Ed.2d 230 (1984). 23 In these circumstances, it was well within the trial court’s equitable discretion to pierce the triangulated relationships among the parties and order relief directly for Seymour’s benefit in one step rather than two.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bushey v. New York State Civil Service Commission
kirkland lieutenants
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Reid
However, “the sum of rights possessed by an intervenor, even if granted unconditional intervention, is not necessarily equivalent to that of a party in a case and depends upon the nature of the intervenor’s interest.” Kirkland v. New York State Dep’t of Correctional Servs., 711 F.2d 1117 , 1126 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 5.Ct. 997, 79 L.Ed.2d 230 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Miller
See United States v. Stockwell, 743 F.2d 123, 125-26 (2d Cir.1984) (citing United States v. Halbert, 712 F.2d 388, 389-90 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 997 , 79 L.Ed.2d 230 (1984); United States v. Madrid, 673 F.2d 1114, 1119-21 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 843 , 103 S.Ct. 96 , 74 L.Ed.2d 88 (1982); United States v. Leonard, 609 F.2d 1163, 1165-66 (5th Cir.1980)). (“Rule 12.2(c) protects the defendant’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination to the extent compatible with the government’s right to respond to an insanity defense, by limiting the u…
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas J. Donaghy v. City of Omaha, a Municipal Corporation, James Skinner, Chief of Police and P.J. Morgan, Mayor of Omaha
See Kirkland v. New York State Dep’t. of Correctional Servs., 711 F.2d 1117 , 1131 n. 16 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 997 , 79 L.Ed.2d 230 (1984); United States v. City of Alexandria, 614 F.2d 1358 , 1365 n. 15 (5th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Susana Sanchez-Robles
See United States v. Halbert, 712 F.2d 388, 390-91 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 997 , 79 L.Ed.2d 230 (1984); see also United States v. Green, 648 F.2d 587, 596 (9th Cir.1981) (per curiam) (evidence that would be improper impeachment of credibility by extrinsic evidence may be properly admitted for another purpose). “[T]here is no rule of evidence which provides that testimony admissible for one purpose and inadmissible for another purpose is thereby rendered inadmissible; quite the contrary is the case.” United States v. Abel, 469 U.S. 45, 56 , 105 S.Ct. 465 , 83…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry Oren
See United States v. Halbert, 712 F.2d 388, 390 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 997 , 79 L.Ed.2d 230 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sherman Wayne Swearingen
Accord United States v. Halbert, 712 F.2d 388, 390 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 [ 104 S.Ct. 997 , 79 L.Ed.2d 230 ] (1984) (mail fraud); Bonnette, 663 F.2d at 498 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilder v. Bernstein
See Kirkland v. New York State Dep’t of Correctional Servs., 711 F.2d 1117 , 1126 (2d Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 997 , 79 L.Ed.2d 230 (1984); Vulcan Soc’y of Westchester County, Inc. v. Fire Dep’t of White Plains, 505 F.Supp. 955, 967-68 (S.D.N.Y.1981) (certain of intervenor unions’ objections to consent judgments presented in consolidated employment discrimination cases were reasonable but would not prevent approval).
cited
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hiram Walker & Sons, Inc.
Accord Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 711 F.2d 1117, 1129 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 997 , 79 L.Ed.2d 230 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
38 Fair empl.prac.cas. 820, 38 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,561 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Delores Agee, Madeline Aiello, Edna Braten, Laura Bury, Neva Buttell, Helen Claver, Charolette Dickerson, Leslie Drummer, Gladys Dwyer, Mary Ebell, Margaret Evans, Pearl Fice, Nora Flynn, Rose Genusa, Annie Gibbons, Freda Goldsmith, Agnes Hall, Rose Harvey, Virgil Hayes, Doris Hornung, Harriet Hutton, Clara Jenkens, Mary Kaufmann, Mary Lafferty, Clara Maricle, Eleanor Marinich, Amelia Monroe, Emma Lou Moore, Ruth Osborn, Ann Pitcher, Julia Ross, Lavon Schuster, Margaret Thompson, Millie Wageman, Josephine Walker, Ann Williams, Grace Wort, Jessie Wright, and Geneva Wytcherly, Intervenors-Appellants v. Hiram Walker & Sons, Inc., and Distillery Workers of America, Local 55
Accord Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 711 F.2d 1117, 1129 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 997 , 79 L.Ed.2d 230 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vanguards of Cleveland v. City of Cleveland, and Local Number 93, I.A.F.F., Afl-Cio, Intervenor-Appellant
(2×)
See Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 711 F.2d 1117, 1126 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 997 , 79 L.Ed.2d 230 (1984); Stotts, 679 F.2d at 558-59 .
discussed
Cited "see"
James Bushey v. New York State Civil Service Commission
See NLRB v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago, 440 U.S. 490, 500-501 , 99 S.Ct. 1313, 1318-1319 , 59 L.Ed.2d 533 (1979). 12 I think this Court should grant certiorari in this case to decide the question left open in Weber, and to address the other difficult questions presented by the decision of the Court of Appeals. 1 See Kirkland v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Services, 711 F.2d 1117 (CA2 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 997 , 79 L.Ed.2d 230 (1984); Kirkland v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Services, 520 F.2d 420 (CA2 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 5…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael C. Stockwell
See United States v. Halbert, 712 F.2d 388, 389-90 (9th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 997 , 79 L.Ed.2d 230 (1984); United States v. Madrid, 673 F.2d 1114, 1119-21 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 843 , 103 S.Ct. 96 , 74 L.Ed.2d 88 (1982); United States v. Leonard, 609 F.2d 1163, 1165-66 (5th Cir. 1980). 4 Although this rule is simply stated, *126 applying it in the circumstances of this case is not an entirely straight-forward proposition, because of the difficulty of drawing a bright line between rebuttal of an insanity defense, on the one hand, and a general attack on cre…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
League of United Latin American Citizens, Council No. 4434 v. Clements
But these participatory rights remain subject to the intervenor's threshold dependency on the original parties' claims, for it is equally well-settled that ”[a]n existing suit within the court’s jurisdiction is a prerequisite of an intervention, which is an ancillary proceeding in an already instituted suit.” Harris v. Amoco Production Co., 768 F.2d 669, 675 (5th Cir.1985) (emphasis added) (internal citations omitted), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1186 , 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986); see also Kirkland v. New York State Dep't of Correctional Servs., 711 F.2d 1117 , 1126 (2d Cir.1983) …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
League of United Latin American Citizens, Council No. 4434 v. Clements
But these participatory rights remain subject to the intervenor's threshold dependency on the original parties' claims, for it is equally well-settled that "[a]n existing suit within the court's jurisdiction is a prerequisite of an intervention, which is an ancillary proceeding in an already instituted suit." Harris v. Amoco Production Co., 768 F.2d 669, 675 (5th Cir.1985) (emphasis added) (internal citations omitted), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1186 , 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986); see also Kirkland v. New York State Dep't of Correctional Servs., 711 F.2d 1117 , 1126 (2d Cir.1983) ("[T]h…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bridgeport Guardians, Inc. v. City of Bridgeport
See Castaneda v. Partida, 430 U.S. 482 , 497 n. 12, 97 S.Ct. 1272 , 1281 n. 12, 51 L.Ed.2d 498 (1977) (noting general rule that standard deviations greater than two or three necessarily exclude chance as a cause of underrepresentation); see also Kirkland v. New York State Dept, of Correctional Services, 711 F.2d 1117 , 1131 n. 17 (2d Cir.1983) (noting that the "likelihood that *1132 the actual results will fall more than one standard deviation beyond the expected results is about 32% ... [while] [f]or more than two standard deviations, it is about 4.6% and for more than three standard deviatio…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. State of La.
See also Livingston Parish School Board v. Lofton, 422 So.2d 1357, 1359 (La.App. 1st Cir.1982) (citing State v. Pettifield, 210 La. 609 , 27 So.2d 424, 426 (1946)). [74] See Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 213 , 92 S.Ct. 1526, 1532 , 32 L.Ed.2d 15 (1972) (citing Pierce v. Society of Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary, 268 U.S. 510, 534 , 45 S.Ct. 571, 573 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1070 (1925)); see id., 406 U.S. at 239 , 92 S.Ct. at 1545 (White, J., concurring) ("reemphasiz[ing] the legitimacy of the State's concern for enforcing minimal educational standards"). [75] Id. at 221, 92 S.Ct. at 1536…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Louisiana
Id. at 221, 92 S.Ct. at 1536; id. at 240, 92 S.Ct. at 1545 (White, J., concurring); see Brown I, 347 U.S. at 493 , 74 S.Ct. at 691 ; see also Duro v. District Attorney, 712 F.2d 96, 97 , 99 & n. 3 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1006 , 104 S.Ct. 998 , 79 L.Ed.2d 230 (1984); id. at 99-100 & n. 1 (Sprouse, J., concurring). .Of course, there could be some freedom of choice, without the State maintaining separate but equal facilities, by providing a difference in support in faculty, facilities, and programs at the various state institutions along with open admissions policies.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Medallion TV Enterprises, Inc. v. SelecTV of California, Inc.
United States v. Ballard, 663 F.2d 534, 541-42 (5th Cir.1981); see also United States v. Halbert, 712 F.2d 388, 390 (9th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 997 , 79 L.Ed.2d 230 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert T. Deveraux v. William J. Geary, and Plaintiff-Class in Culbreath v. Dukakis, Intervenors-Appellees
See also Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 711 F.2d 1117 (2d Cir.1983) (applying Weber), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 997 , 79 L.Ed.2d 230 (1984); Bratton v. City of Detroit, 704 F.2d 878 , 884 n. 18 (6th Cir.1983) (applying Weber), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984); Local Union No. 35 v. City of Hartford, 625 F.2d 416 , 435 (2d Cir.1980) (applying Weber), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 3148 , 69 L.Ed.2d 997 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Halbert
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-658.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 23, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.