green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
10.1 score
“if any connection had with the commission of the tort occurred without the forum state ... under sound due process principles, the nexus ... is too tenuous to support jurisdiction”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Tasz, Inc. v. Industrial Thermo Polymers, Ltd.
f an officer does not personally participate in a corporation's tort, general corporate law does not subject him to liability simply by virtue of his office.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Fox v. Southern Railway Co.
he rla has made any grievance arising out of the collective bargaining agreement subject to the exclusive arbitral remedies contained in that act_
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Wilson v. Wilson-Cook Medical, Inc.
if corporation a from state x sends employee b into state y to , injuring resident c in state y, then jurisdiction over both a and b exists in state y.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hanline v. Sinclair Global Brokerage Corp.
if any connection had with the commission of the tort occurred without the forum state ... under sound due process principles, the nexus ... is too tenuous to support jurisdiction
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Sheppard v. Jacksonville Marine Supply, Inc.
Id. at 312-313 (citations omitted) (quoting Kulko v. California Superior Court, 436 U.S. 84, 91 , 98 S.Ct. 1690, 1696-97 , 56 L.Ed.2d 132 (1978) and citing Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235, 253 , 78 S.Ct. 1228, 1239-40 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1283 (1958)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Kelly Rollins and Dan Slaughter
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Id. at 267. 6 .
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
James W. Leu, Individually and as Representative of a Class v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company
Ct. 1000, 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
GRISSAM v. State
See Plunkett v. Estelle, 709 F.2d 1004, 1009 (5th Cir.1983), cert, denied, McKaskle v. Plunkett, 465 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 1000 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984); see, e.g., Cook v. State, 884 S.W.2d 485, 491 (Tex.Crim.App. 1994) ("It is error for a trial judge to not limit the definitions of the culpable mental states as they relate to the conduct elements involved in the particular offense.”). 13 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Susan H. McDougal
See United States v. Shively, 715 F.2d 260, 268-69 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied 465 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 1001 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984); United States v. Stembridge, 477 F.2d 874, 876 (5th Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Advanced Environmental Recycling Technologies, Inc.
Accord Columbia Briargate Co. v. First Nat’l Bank, 713 F.2d 1052, 1057 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 1001 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1983) (the fiduciary shield doctrine should not be adopted where the long-arm statute is designed to provide personal jurisdiction to the maximum permissible under the Constitution).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Douglas D. Crabtree and Patrick H. Cray
See United States v. Shively, 715 F.2d 260, 269 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 1001 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
William Calvert Patti Jo Calvert v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. Carl C. Icahn
See id.
discussed
Cited "see"
R. Paul Beard and Scarlett Beard v. Carrollton Railroad and Csx Transportation, Inc., (88-5910) the Travelers and the Travelers Companies, (88-6280)
(2×)
See Jackson v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 717 F.2d 1045, 1052 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 1000 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, (88-5195), (88-5484) v. Billy York Walker, (88-5195), (88-5484)
See United States v. Shively, 715 F.2d 260, 265 (7th Cir.1983) (“it has been held to be misapplication per se for a bank officer or employee to funnel funds to himself by making a loan to a third party ... ”), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 1001 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984); United States v. Krepps, 605 F.2d 101, 106 (3rd Cir.1979); United States v. Twiford, 600 F.2d 1339, 1341 (10th Cir.1979) (“misapplication occurs when an officer of a bank knowingly lends money to a fictitious borrower or causes the loan to be made for his own benefit, concealing his interest from the bank”); Un…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Norman B. Smith and Robert A. Bailey
See, United States v. Shively, 715 F.2d 260, 264 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 2001 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984) (dictum).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dibble v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad
See Jackson v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 717 F.2d 1045, 1057 (7th Cir.1983) (Posner, J. dissenting) (only a minimal factual overlap between an FELA claim and a claim for retaliation), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 1000 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Bruun and Ronald Berkovitz
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Shively, 715 F.2d 260, 265 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 1001 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984) (citing United States v. Gallagher, 576 F.2d 1028, 1045-46 (3d Cir.1978) and United States v. Gens, 493 F.2d 216, 222 (1st Cir.1974)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Harvey Washburn
Accord United States v. Shively, 715 F.2d 260, 265 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 1001 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984); United States v. Ford, 642 F.2d 77, 78 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 17 , 101 S.Ct. 1996 , 68 L.Ed.2d 310 (1981); see also United States v. Stuart-Caballero, 686 F.2d 890, 893 (11th Cir.1982) (applying Platenburg and Maner to federal registration of vessel); cf. United States v. Rowan, 518 F.2d 685, 693 (6th Cir.) (sufficient evidence of federal insurance was found by jury in special verdict), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 949 , 96 S.Ct. 368 , 46 L.Ed.2d 284 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sager v. District Court for the Second Judicial District
(2×)
See Kroog v. Mait, 712 F.2d 1148 (7th Cir.1983), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1001 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sager v. DIST. COURT FOR SECOND JUD. DIST.
(2×)
See Kroog v. Mait, 712 F.2d 1148 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 1001 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Francis Olinger
See United States v. Muelbl, 739 F.2d 1175 , 1181-1182 and n. 4 (7th Cir.1984) (harmonizing Kramer and United States v. Shively, 715 F.2d 260 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 1001 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984), and following Kramer).
cited
Cited "see"
Surman v. Merrill Lynch
See Kroog v. Mait, 712 F.2d 1148 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 1001 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984)
cited
Cited "see"
Surman v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
See Kroog v. Mait, 712 F.2d 1148 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, —— U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1001 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Plant Genetic Systems, N v. v. Ciba Seeds
See, e.g., Columbia Briargate Co. v. First Nat’l Bank, 713 F.2d 1052 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 1001 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bradley W. Rothhammer, United States of America v. Gary L. Miles
See also United States v. Shively, 715 F.2d 260, 264 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 1001 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984) (defendant made untrue statement in note regarding purpose of loan).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Foliety v. Cervantes
See also Jackson v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 717 F.2d 1045, 1055 (7th Cir.1983) (“The general rule is that subject matter jurisdiction may be ... raised sua sponte by the court at any point in the proceedings.”), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 1000 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donald U. Austin
See also United States v. Shively, 715 F.2d 260, 265-66 (7th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 405 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 1001 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984). 3.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc. v. Cellular Communications Corp.
See also Columbia Briargate Co. v. First National Bank in Dallas, 713 F.2d 1052 , 1063 n. 22 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 1001 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984) ("In all of these Illinois cases, ... the real basis of the decisions, is not the bare language of the doctrine but the absence of any contacts of the individual agent in Illinois with the alleged [wrongdoings].”); Chancellor v. Lawrence, 501 F.Supp. 997, 1005 (N.D.Ill.1986); First National Bank of Chicago v. Boelcskevy, 126 Ill.App.3d 271, 275-76 , 81 Ill.Dec. 380, 384 , 466 N.E.2d 1182, 1186 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Winston B. Lewy v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company
Because it relates to whether the district court could exercise subject-matter jurisdiction over Lewy’s claim, see Crusos v. United Transportation Union, Local 1201, 786 F.2d 970, 972-73 (9th Cir.1986); see also Jackson v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 717 F.2d 1045, 1054-55 (7th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 1000 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984); de la Rosa Sanchez v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., 574 F.2d 29, 32 (1st Cir.1978), we raised the issue sua sponte and directed the parties to file supplemental memoranda on the question prior to oral argument.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pikop v. Burlington Northern Railroad
(2×)
See also, Jackson v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 717 F.2d 1045 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 1000 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984) (railway employee’s claim of retaliatory discharge preempted by RLA); Choate v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., 715 F.2d 369 (7th Cir.1983) (railway employee’s claim that railroad wrongfully discharged him and failed to reinstate him is a minor dispute under the RLA); Magnuson v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 576 F.2d 1367 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 930 , 99 S.Ct. 318 , 58 L.Ed.2d 323 (1978) (wrongful discharge claim of railway emplo…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jim Buell v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a Corporation
See also Jackson v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 717 F.2d 1045 (7th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, — U.S. ---, 104 S.Ct. 1000 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984); Landfried v. Terminal Railroad Association, 721 F.2d 254 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. ---, 104 S.Ct. 1712 , 80 L.Ed.2d 185 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Armando Gonzalez v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company
See, e.g., Martin v. Kilgore First Bancorp, Inc., 747 F.2d 1024, 1027 (5th Cir.1984) (“Regardless of the age of the ambiguity, our duty is to interpret the words of the statute to further the purpose Congress sought to accomplish by its enactment.”). . 717 F.2d 1045 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 1000 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984). . 721 F.2d 254 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 1712 , 80 L.Ed.2d 185 (1984). . 609 F.2d at 1153 . .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
James McNeill Bailey v. Raymond K. Procunier, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
See also Plunkett v. Estelle, 709 F.2d 1004, 1009 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1000 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE v. Melamed
See also Kroog v. Mait, 712 F.2d 1148 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 1001 , 79 L.Ed.2d 233 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McKaskle, Acting Director, Texas Department of Corrections
v.
Plunkett
v.
Plunkett
No. 83-884.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 23, 1984.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
Citer courts: N.D. Georgia (1) · W.D. Missouri (1) · M.D. North Carolina (1) · W.D. North Carolina (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.