green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.2 score
“t is only the right of redemption, rather than the property itself, which passes into the bankruptcy estate if the redemption period has not expired at the time of the bankruptcy petition is filed.”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Duprey v. Eagle Lake Water & Sewer District
t is only the right of redemption, rather than the property itself, which passes into the bankruptcy estate if the redemption period has not expired at the time of the bankruptcy petition is filed.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Childress v. Middleton Arms, Ltd. Partnership (In Re Middleton Arms, Ltd. Partnership)
although a bankruptcy court is essentially a court of equity, its broad equitable powers may only be exercised in a manner which is consistent with the provisions of the code.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Howards Appliance Corp.
In Johnson v. First Nat’l Bank, 719 F.2d 270 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984), the Eighth Circuit analyzed the limitation on bankruptcy courts’ equitable powers and held that, “[although a bankruptcy court is essentially a court of equity ... its broad equitable powers may only be exercised in a manner which is consistent with the provisions of the [Bankruptcy] Code.” Id. at 273; see also, In re J.M.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rosenberg v. DVI Receivables, XIV, LLC (In Re Rosenberg)
See Johnson v. First Nat’l Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); In re Texas Consumer Finance Corp., 480 F.2d 1261, 1265 (5th Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hakeem v. Beyer
See O'Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365 , 402 n. 9 (5th Cir.1983) (Buchmeyer, D.J., dissenting), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); Wright v. North Carolina, 483 F.2d 405, 408 (4th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 1452 , 39 L.Ed.2d 494 (1974). 74 Here, in rejecting the findings of the state appellate court, the district court appears to have relied on subsections (1) and (8) without further analysis.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hakeem v. Beyer
See O’Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365 , 402 n. 9 (5th Cir.1983) (Buchmeyer, D.J., dissenting), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); Wright v. North Carolina, 483 F.2d 405, 408 (4th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 1452 , 39 L.Ed.2d 494 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Insurance Co. v. Sheldon
See Johnson v. First Nat’l Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 278 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Diversified Washes of Vandalia, Inc.
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270 , 273 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 [ 79 L.Ed.2d 245 ], (1984) [additional citations omitted].
discussed
Cited "see"
Derick Lynn Peterson v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Accord O’Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365, 388-89 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); cf. Boyde v. California, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 1190, 1196 , 108 L.Ed.2d 316 (1990) (“states are free to structure and shape consideration of mitigating evidence”).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Tudor Motor Lodge Associates, Ltd. Partnership
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Leon Rutherford King v. James A. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent
(2×)
See O'Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365, 388-89 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Whispering Bay Campground, Inc. v. Fagan
See Johnson v. First Nat’l Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 278 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Whispering Bay Campground, Inc.
See Johnson v. First Nat'l Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 278 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984). 12 Accordingly, the lower courts' decision to lift the bankruptcy code's automatic stay is affirmed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hood v. Williams (In Re Hood)
See, Johnson v. First Nat’l Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); Fisher v. First Union Mortgage Corp. (In re Fisher) 80 B.R. 58, 62 (Bankr.M.D.N.C.1987).
cited
Cited "see"
McColley v. Rosenberg (In Re Candor Diamond Corp.)
See Johnson v. First National Bank, 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Flying \S\" Land & Cattle Co. v. Beaumont (In Re Flying \"S\" Land & Cattle Co.)"
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270 (8th Cir.1983) cert. denied 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (appealed on other grounds), citing In re Interstate Restaurant Systems, Inc., 26 B.R. 298, 301 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1982) and In re Santa Fe Development, 16 B.R. 165, 167 (Bankr. 9th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert B. Sutton and Sutton Investments, Inc.
See Johnson v. First Bank of Montevideo, Minn., 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); In re Texas Consumer Finance Corp., 480 F.2d 1261, 1265 (5th Cir.1973). 19 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Lavender v. Wood Law Firm
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984). 3 Here, appellant clearly failed to comply with the notice and application requirements of the Bankruptcy Code and Rules.
discussed
Cited "see"
J.L. Lavender and Mary Lavender, Individually, and J.L. Lavender D/B/A Lavender Construction Company v. Wood Law Firm
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Monte *249 video, 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984). 3 Here, appellant clearly failed to comply with the notice and application requirements of the Bankruptcy Code and Rules.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re G-N Partners
See Martinson v. First National Bank of Oakes (In re Martinson), 731 F.2d 543 (8th Cir.1984), Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270 (8th Cir.1983), cert. den., — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lindquist v. First Northtown National Bank ( in Re Lakeland Development Corp.)
(2×)
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Edward Pirsig Farms, Inc. v. John Deere Co. (In Re Pirsig Farms, Inc.)
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 274 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); In re Wood, 33 B.R. 320, 322 (Bankr.D.Id.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Ronald S. Monroe v. Frank Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Angola, Respondent
See O’Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365, 372 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Players' Pub, Inc.
See Johnson v. First National Bank, 719 F.2d 270 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); In re Lauderdale Motorcar Corp., 35 B.R. 544 , 11 B.C.D. 517 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1983); In re Intermet Realty Partnership, 26 B.R. 383 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1983); and In re Darwin, 22 B.R. 259 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1982) Cf. Butner v. United States, 440 U.S. 48 , 99 S.Ct. 914 , 59 L.Ed.2d 136 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Miller and Co. v. United States
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, Minnesota, 719 F.2d 270, 277 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Moore v. Maggio
See O'Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365, 377-78 (discussing rehabilitation of veniremen challenged on Witherspoon grounds), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Moore v. Maggio
See O’Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365, 377-78 (discussing rehabilitation of veniremen challenged on Witherspoon grounds), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gerald W. Moody, and Jermoo's Incorporated, Debtors-In-Possession, Plaintiffs v. Amoco Oil Company
(2×)
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
First Constitution Bank v. Flanders, No. Cv 910310164s (Mar. 22, 1995)
Although the majority of courts have concluded that the stay imposed pursuant to § 362(a) does not toll the running of a redemption period; see, e.g., Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, Minn., 719 F.2d 270 (8th Cir. 1983), cert. denied 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); Tabor Enterprises, Inc. v. People of the State of Ill., 65 B.R. 42 (N.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
USM Workers' Committee v. Decker (In Re USM Technology Corp.)
In re B & W Enter., Inc., 713 F.2d 534 (1983); In re Pacific Express, Inc., 69 B.R. 112, 115 (Bankr. 9th Cir.1986); see also Johnson v. First Natl Bank, 719 F.2d 270 , 273 (8th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zeoli v. RIHT Mortgage Corp.
See, e.g., Johnson v. First Nat'l Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 274 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984) (Bankruptcy Code may not be invoked to toll or suspend the running of a statutory period of redemption created by state law absent fraud, mistake, accident or erroneous conduct by the foreclosing officer. 11 U.S.C. 105(a)). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Heron, Burchette, Ruckert & Rothwell
See also Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, Minnesota, 719 F.2d 270, 273-75 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984). .In Butner , the Court struck down a uniform federal rule of law that altered the property rights of a mortgagee as they existed at state law.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Illinois Service Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Academy of St. James College Preparatory
See also Johnson v. First National Bank (8th Cir. 1983), 719 F.2d 270 , 276, cert, denied (1984), 465 U.S. 1012 , 79 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Sabec
If a debtor desires to retain an interest in real property sold at a valid foreclosure sale, the plan must provide for the payment of the entire redemption amount within the later of (1) the redemption period fixed by state law, 11 U.S.C. § 108 (b)(1), or (2) sixty days after the debtor files the bankruptcy petition (assuming the redemption period has not already expired). 11 U.S.C. § 108 (b)(2); see also, Johnson v. First Natl Bank, 719 F.2d 270 , 278 (8th Cir.1983), cert, denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984) (cited approvingly, Glenn, 760 F.2d at 1440). 21 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lauti v. State
(2×)
See also O'Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365, 383-385 (5th Cir.1983), cert, denied 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Plaza De Diego Shopping Center, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of Robert L. Coley, Esquire. In Re Petition of Robert L. Coley, Etc
See, e.g., Johnson v. First Nat’l Bank of Montevideo, Minn., 719 F.2d 270, 273-75 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1983) (bankruptcy court lacked authority under general equitable power section, 11 U.S.C. § 105 (a) to stay indefinitely expiration of statutory redemption period created by state law in connection with real estate mortgage foreclosure).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Nejberger v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (In Re Nejberger)
See also Johnson v. First National Bank, 719 F.2d 270, 278 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gina Antoinette Browner
See, e.g., United States v. Eagle Elk, 711 F.2d 80, 81 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); United States v. Skinner, 667 F.2d 1306 , 1309 n. 1 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1229 , 103 S.Ct. 3569 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1410 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Memphis-Friday's Associates
Id.; see also ftn. 15, at p. 1215, where the Moody court observed that application of Section 108(b) would “cause irreconcilable conflict between the two sections,” citing Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984). 8 Additionally, Congress clearly was aware of the existence of Section 108(b) when the 1984 Amendments were enacted; therefore, the omission of any reference to Section 108(b) is significant.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rogers v. Lynaugh
Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637, 643 , 94 S.Ct. 1868, 1871 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974); see also O’Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365, 387 (5th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); Branch v. Estelle, 631 F.2d 1229, 1233 (5th Cir. Unit A 1980); Cobb v. Wainwright, 609 F.2d 754, 755-56 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 857 (1980); see Kirkpatrick v. Blackburn, 777 F.2d 272, 278, 280 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1178 , 106 S.Ct. 2907 , 90 L.Ed.2d 993 (1986). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zackary Rogers v. James A. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent
Conclusion 24 For the reasons assigned, the judgment of the district court is 25 AFFIRMED. * Circuit Judge of the Second Circuit, sitting by designation 1 Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637, 643 , 94 S.Ct. 1868, 1871 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974); see also O'Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365, 387 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); Branch v. Estelle, 631 F.2d 1229, 1233 (5th Cir. Unit A 1980); Cobb v. Wainwright, 609 F.2d 754, 755-56 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 857 (1980); see Kirkpatrick v. Blackburn, 777 F…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin v. State
See also O'Bryan v. Estelle , 714 F.2d 365 , 388-89 (5th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Leon Rutherford King v. James A. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent
See, e.g., Munroe v. State, 637 S.W.2d 475, 476-77 (Tex.Crim.App.1982) (en banc). . 714 F.2d 365, 388-89 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lois E. Hilton Ford
(2×)
See, e.g., O’Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984). . 469 U.S. 412 , 105 S.Ct. 844 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841 (1985). "[T]he Witkerspoon-Witt standard is rooted in the constitutional right to an impartial jury_" Gray v. Mississippi, — U.S. at -, 107 S.Ct. at 2056. .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Merrill v. Abbott (In Re Independent Clearing House Co.)
See also Johnson v. First Nat’l Bank of Montevideo, Minn., 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984), and cases cited therein.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Friarton Estates Corp. v. City of New York (In Re Friarton Estates Corp.)
See also, Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 274 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ross v. State
See also Stafford v. State, 665 P.2d 1205 (Okl.Cr.1983), vacated, 467 U.S. 1212 , 104 S.Ct. 2651 , 81 L.Ed.2d 359 (1984), aff'd., 700 P.2d 223 (1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 188 , 88 L.Ed.2d 157 (1985) and O’Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Stern
In re Player’s Pub, Inc., 3 Bankr.L.Rep., (CCH) para. 70,200 at 86,321 (Bkrtcy.D.Mass.1985); In re Physique Forum Gym, Inc., 27 B.R. 691 (Bkrtcy.D.Md.1982); See also Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); In re G-N Partners, 48 B.R. 462 , 12 B.C.D. 1258 (D.Minn.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re McCallen
See e.g., Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, Minn, (hereinafter “Johnson ”), 719 F.2d 270 (8th Cir.1983) cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); In re Cucumber Creek Development, Inc., 33 B.R. 820 (D.Colo.1983); In re Petersen, 42 B.R. 39 (Bankr.D.Or.1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Howze
v.
Marshall, Superintendent, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
v.
Marshall, Superintendent, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
No. 83-5678.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 23, 1984.
C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Justice Marshall would grant certiorari.