green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
10.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1987 ·
…dismissal of an indictment is therefore warranted on constitutional grounds if prosecutorial misconduct has undermined the grand jury's ability to make an informed and objective evaluation of the evidence presented to it.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings
t is well settled law ... that evidence may be used even if obtained in violation of the exclusionary rule
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mccarthy v. Mayo
dismissal of an indictment is therefore warranted on constitutional grounds if prosecutorial misconduct has undermined the grand jury's ability to make an informed and objective evaluation of the evidence presented to it.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
McCarthy v. Mayo
dismissal of an indictment is therefore warranted on constitutional grounds if prosecutorial misconduct has undermined the grand jury's ability to make an informed and objective evaluation of the evidence presented to it.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Darrel Simpson Robert Anderson James Freeman
(2×)
See United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 719 F.2d 1386, 1391 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1079 , 104 S.Ct. 1441 , 79 L.Ed.2d 762 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Delaune v. Saint Marine Transportation Co.
See generally Ryals v. Estelle, 661 F.2d 904, 906 (5th Cir. Nov. 1981) (per curiam). 43 . 419 F.2d 230, 236 (5th Cir.), reh'g en banc denied, 419 F.2d 238 (5th Cir.1969) (per curiam) (7-6), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 989 , 90 S.Ct. 1120 , 25 L.Ed.2d 396 (1970), overruled on other grounds in Crown Zellerbach Corp. v. Ingram Industries, Inc., 783 F.2d 1296 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 821 , 107 S.Ct. 87 , 93 L.Ed.2d 40 (1986). 44 . 433 So.2d 281, 288 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 440 So.2d 731 (La.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1079 , 104 S.Ct. 1442 , 79 L.Ed.2d 762 (1984). 45 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William A. Kilpatrick, Declan J. O'donnell, Sheila C. Lerner, the Bank of Nova Scotia, Michael Alberga, C.S. Gill, and C.M. Smith
See United States v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 719 F.2d 1386 , 1391 n. 7 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1079 , 104 S.Ct. 1441 , 79 L.Ed.2d 762 (1984) 7 The first consideration is necessitated by the Supreme Court's opinions in Mechanik, 475 U.S. 66 , 106 S.Ct. 938 , 89 L.Ed.2d 50 (1986) and United States v. Hasting, 461 U.S. 499 , 103 S.Ct. 1974 , 76 L.Ed.2d 96 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Darrel Paterson Simpson, Robert MacRiner Anderson, and James Roy Freeman
See United States v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 719 F.2d 1386 , 1395 n. 2 (9th Cir.1983) (Norris, J., dissenting in part), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1079 , 104 S.Ct. 1441 , 79 L.Ed.2d 762 (1984); cf. In re Kiefaber, 774 F.2d 969, 974 (9th Cir.1985) (exercise of supervisory power to quash grand jury subpoena reviewed for abuse of discretion).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sammy Herrera Venegas and Eddie Adrian Vindiola
See United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 719 F.2d 1386, 1393 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1079 , 104 S.Ct. 1441 , 79 L.Ed.2d 762 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, Inc.
See United States v. Sears, 719 F.2d 1386, 1388 (9th Cir.1983) (in a previous appeal, this court noted that a possible motive for Sears’ alleged false statements was “to avoid dumping duties____”), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1079 , 104 S.Ct. 1441 , 79 L.Ed.2d 762 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Roy Griffith (82-1485), Gerald L. McKay (82-1495), Frank Ross Reynolds, III (82-1496)
See United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc., 719 F.2d 1386, 1394 (9th Cir.1983) (Norris, J., dissenting in part), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1441 , 79 L.Ed.2d 762 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Ali v. Offshore Co.
See Symeonides v. Cosmar Compañía Naviera, S.A., 433 So.2d 281, 284-5 (La.Ct.App. 1983), cert. denied, — U.S.—, 104 S.Ct. 1442 , 79 L.Ed.2d 762 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Maureen Ali, Personal Representative of the Estate of Amin Ali, Deceased v. The Offshore Company, Theodora Fraser, Personal Representative of the Estate of Agustus Daniel Fraser, Deceased v. The Offshore Company
See Symeonides v. Cosmar Compania Naviera, S.A., 433 So.2d 281, 284-5 (La.Ct.App.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 1442 , 79 L.Ed.2d 762 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Zielezinski
See United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 719 F.2d 1386, 1391-92 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 1441 , 79 L.Ed.2d 762 (1984); United States v. Al Mudarris, 695 F.2d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 932 , 103 S.Ct. 2097 , 77 L.Ed.2d 305 (1983); United States v. Kennedy, 564 F.2d 1329, 1338 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 944 , 98 S.Ct. 1526 , 55 L.Ed.2d 541 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rafael Guzman-Solis
Danielson, 325 F.3d at 1069 (clarifying there is no Sixth Amendment violation unless there is “substantial prejudice”); see also United States v. Rogers, 751 F.2d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1985) (citing United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc., 719 F.2d 1386, 1391-92 (9th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1079 , 104 S.Ct. 1441 , 79 L.Ed.2d 762 (1984); United States v. Owen, 580 F.2d 365, 367 (9th Cir. 1978)) (stating “an indictment may not be dismissed for governmental misconduct absent prejudice to the defendant”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coleman v. Robicheaux Air Boats, Inc.
See also Symeonides v. Cosmar Companía Naviera, S.A., 433 So.2d 281, 288 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 440 So.2d 731 (La.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1079 , 104 S.Ct. 1442 , 79 L.Ed.2d 762 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph Isgro Raymond Anderson Jeffrey S. Monka
See also United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 719 F.2d 1386, 1394 (9th Cir.1983) (“[W]e disagree with [the district court] that the grand jury could not have returned an informed indictment because the prosecutor failed to introduce ... allegedly exculpatory evidence.”), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1079 , 104 S.Ct. 1441 , 79 L.Ed.2d 762 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eugene Leslie
(2×)
These goals are separate from the goal of protecting a defendant’s constitutional right to a fair trial.” Note, The Exercise of Supervisory Powers to Dismiss a Grand Jury Indictment — A Basis for Curbing Prosecutorial Misconduct, 45 Ohio St.L.J. 1077, 1084 (1984); see also United States v. Sears, Roebuck Co., 719 F.2d 1386, 1394 (9th Cir.1983) (Norris, J. dissenting in part), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1079 , 104 S.Ct. 1441 , 79 L.Ed.2d 762 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Disbarment of Armentrout
No. D-398.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2) · D. Hawaii (1)
It is ordered that Eugene Lee Armentrout, of West Dundee, Ill., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.