green
Positive treatment
12.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 43 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Mouktabis v. Faber
See Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Com., Inc., 705 F2d 1515, 1523 (9th Cir 1983) cert den 465 US 1081 (1984) (granting injunction against reliti- gating an action against 253 defendants in over 30 districts that had twice before been dismissed); D’Amico ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
Perry v. Salem Health
See Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, 705 F.2d 1515, 1523 (9th Cir. 1983), 4 cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. LINDA RAY GARDNER, —
In general, “the government may comment on the failure of the defense, as opposed to - the defendant, to counter or explain the evidence [unless] the jury would naturally and necessarily take it to be a comment on the failure of the accused to testify.” United States v. Guzman, 781 F.2d 428, 432 (5th Cir.) (quotation omitted), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S.Ct. 1798 , 90 L.Ed.2d 343 (1986); see United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633, 651 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1447 , 79 L.Ed.2d 766 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Linda Ray Gardner
In general, “the government may comment on the failure of the defense, as opposed to the defendant, to counter or explain the evidence [unless] the jury would naturally and necessarily take it to be a comment on the failure of the accused to testify.” United States v. Guzman, 781 F.2d 428, 432 (5th Cir.) (quotation omitted), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 (1986); see United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633, 651 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 (1984).
examined
Cited "see"
FS Photo, Inc. v. PictureVision, Inc.
(3×)
See Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 705 F.2d 1515, 1523 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1446 , 79 L.Ed.2d 765 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boyce v. Woodruff
See Sullivan v. American Casualty, 605 N.E.2d 134, 139 (Ind.1992) (“[W]e determine what the first judgement decided and then examine how that determination bears on the second case.”) (citing Webb v. State, 453 N.E.2d 180, 183 (Ind.1983), cert, denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1449 , 79 L.Ed.2d 767 (1984)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel M. Paradies, the Paradies Shops, Inc., Paradies Midfield Corporation, Ira Jackson
See United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633, 652-53 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1447 , 79 L.Ed.2d 766 (1984). 37 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paradies
See United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633, 652-53 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1447 , 79 L.Ed.2d 766 (1984). though the evidence may be weak, insufficient, inconsistent, or of doubtful credibility." United States v. Opdahl, 930 F.2d 1530, 1535 (11th Cir.1991) (quoting United States v. Lively, 803 F.2d 1124, 1126 (11th Cir.1986)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brian S. Faile v. Michael Hope Michael Surrick John Does I Through III
See Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 705 F.2d 1515, 1520 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 (1984). 5 Each party to bear its own costs on appeal. 6 AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.
cited
Cited "see"
Rash B. Ghosh v. California Department of Health Services California State Personnel Board Howard Hatayama
See Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, 705 F.2d 1515, 1519 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 (1984)
discussed
Cited "see"
Meeks v. PRN, Inc.
See Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, 705 F.2d 1515, 1519 (9th Cir.1983) (affirming the striking of a late affidavit because the court "acted within its discretion"), cert denied, 465 U.S. 1081 (1984) 2 Appellees argue that the assets of PRNSS were acquired pursuant to a valid security interest; however, they also argue that PRNSS was insolvent at the time of the transaction with Appellant, just before the execution of the Franchise Agreement.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark A. Barquera
See United States v. Principato, 717 F.2d 1313, 1314 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied 465 U.S. 1081 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
John R. Eppel, Jr. v. John Doe
See Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, 705 F.2d 1515 , 1523-24 n. 7 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 (1984). 2 AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.
examined
Cited "see"
Kregos v. Associated Press
(3×)
See Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 705 F.2d 1515 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1446 , 79 L.Ed.2d 765 (1984).
examined
Cited "see"
King v. Russell
(3×)
See Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 705 F.2d 1515, 1523 (9th Cir.1983) ("Justice would not have been served by transferring Wood's claims back to a jurisdiction that he purposefully sought to avoid through blatant forum shopping."), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1446 , 79 L.Ed.2d 765 (1984).
examined
Cited "see"
King v. Russell
(3×)
See Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 705 F.2d 1515, 1523 (9th Cir.1983) (“Justice would not have been served by transferring Wood’s claims back to a jurisdiction that he purposefully sought to avoid through blatant forum shopping.”), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1446 , 79 L.Ed.2d 765 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Church, Carl Louis Coppola
See United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633 , 643 n. 9 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1447 , 79 L.Ed.2d 766 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633, 651 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1447 , 79 L.Ed.2d 766 (1984); United States v. Hager, 505 F.2d 737, 740 (8th Cir.1974); United States v. Gotchis, 803 F.2d 74, 81 (2nd Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bell v. City of Kellogg
See Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 699 F.2d 484, 485-86 (9th Cir.1983) (awarding fees against a pro se plaintiff), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1080 , 104 S.Ct. 1445 , 79 L.Ed.2d 765 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bell v. City of Kellogg
See Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 699 F.2d 484, 485-86 (9th Cir.1983) (awarding fees against a pro se plaintiff), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1080 , 104 S.Ct. 1445 , 79 L.Ed.2d 765 (1984).
examined
Cited "see"
Moy v. United States
(3×)
See Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 705 F.2d 1515, 1524 (9th Cir.1983) ("district courts do have the power to reinforce the effects of [collateral estoppel and res judicata] by issuing an injunction against repetitive litigation"), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1446 , 79 L.Ed.2d 765 (1984); In re Hartford Textile Corp., 681 F.2d 895 , 897 (2d Cir.1982) ("[t]he equity power of a court to give injunctive relief against vexatious litigation is an ancient one which has been codified in the All Writs Statute, 28 U.S.C.
examined
Cited "see"
Moy v. United States
(3×)
See Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 705 F.2d 1515, 1524 (9th Cir.1983) (“district courts do have the power to reinforce the effects of [collateral estoppel and res judicata] by issuing an injunction against repetitive litigation”), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1446 , 79 L.Ed.2d 765 (1984); In re Hartford Textile Corp., 681 F.2d 895 , 897 (2d Cir.1982) (“[t]he equity power of a court to give injunctive relief against vexatious litigation is an ancient one which has been codified in the All Writs Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (a)”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1206 , …
examined
Cited "see"
In re Williams
(3×)
Trust, 615 F.2d 1068 (5th Cir.1980); Accord, Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, 705 F.2d 1515 (9th Cir.1983), cert. den. 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1446 , 79 L.Ed.2d 765 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Timothy Jones, Charles Wayne Norman, Perry Cecil Patronelli, and Richard Keith Hagler
See United States v. Holcomb, 797 F.2d 1320, 1325 (5th Cir.1986) (quoting United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633, 640 (11th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1447 , 79 L.Ed.2d 766 (1984)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Erwin
United States v. Bolts, 558 F.2d 316, 325 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 898 , 99 S.Ct. 262 , 58 L.Ed.2d 246 (1978) (citations omitted); accord United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633, 646 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1447 , 79 L.Ed.2d 766 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Erwin
United States v. Bolts, 558 F.2d 316, 325 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 898 , 99 S.Ct. 262 , 58 L.Ed.2d 246 (1978) (citations omitted); accord United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633, 646 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1447 , 79 L.Ed.2d 766 (1984).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Yair Holtzman
(4×)
See Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 705 F.2d 1515, 1525 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 1446 , 79 L.Ed.2d 765 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dan Caputo Co. v. Russian River County Sanitation District
(2×)
See Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 705 F.2d 1515, 1520 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 1446 , 79 L.Ed.2d 765 (1984).CONCLUSION 28 There is no merit to any of Caputo/Wagner's contentions.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dan Caputo Co. v. Russian River County Sanitation District
(2×)
See Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 705 F.2d 1515, 1520 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 1446 , 79 L.Ed.2d 765 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
William S. Sires, Jr. v. Harold Gabriel
(2×)
See Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 705 F.2d 1515, 1523-1526 (9th Cir.1983) cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 1446 , 79 L.Ed.2d 765 (1984) (district court’s injunction upheld preventing Wood, who had filed over 35 similar complaints, from filing new actions paralleling the issues being litigated in a ease and preventing him from relitigating issues decided in two cases); In re Oliver, 682 F.2d 443 (3rd Cir.1982) (injunction of district court, based upon finding that Oliver had filed over fifty frivolous cases, would be upheld unless Oliver made a sufficient showing on re…
discussed
Cited "see"
Schroeder v. Fuller
(2×)
See Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 705 F.2d 1515, 1519 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1446 , 79 L.Ed.2d 765 (1984); McLaughlin v. City of LaGrange, 662 F.2d 1385, 1387-88 (11th Cir.1981); Farina v. Mission Investment Trust, 615 F.2d 1068, 1076 (5th Cir.1980); Woods v. Allied Concord Financial Corp., 373 F.2d 733, 734 (5th Cir.1967); Beaufort Concrete Co. v. Atlantic States Construction Co., 352 F.2d 460, 462-63 (5th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 1004 , 86 S.Ct. 1908 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1018 (1966).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Paciulan v. George
(3×)
See also Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 705 F.2d 1515, 1524 (9th Cir.1983) (“district courts do have the power to reinforce the effects of [collateral estop-pel and res judicata] by issuing an injunction against repetitive litigation”), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1446 , 79 L.Ed.2d 765 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kalama v. United States
See, e.g., Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 705 F.2d 1515, 1524 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 (1984).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Abacus Broadcasting Corp.
(3×)
See, e.g., Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 705 F.2d 1515, 1523 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1446 , 79 L.Ed.2d 765 (1984); Intern.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re March
(3×)
See, e.g., Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 705 F.2d 1515, 1523-24 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1446 , 79 L.Ed.2d 765 (1984); In re Mahurkar Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Patent Litig., 140 B.R. 969, 973-974 (N.D.Ill.1992); In re Ocean Ranger Sinking off Newfoundland, 617 F.Supp. 435, 436, 439 (E.D.La.1985).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Farmers Bank v. Kittay
(3×)
See, e.g., Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 705 F.2d 1515, 1523-24 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1446 , 79 L.Ed.2d 765 (1984); In re Mahurkar Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Patent Litig., 140 B.R. 969, 973-974 (N.D.Ill.1992); In re Ocean Ranger Sinking off Newfoundland, 617 F.Supp. 435, 436, 439 (E.D.La.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marshall v. Gates
(2×)
See also Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 705 F.2d 1515, 1519 (9th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104S.Ct. 1446, 79 L.Ed.2d 765 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sassower v. Field
See, e.g., Woods v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 699 F.2d 484, 485-86 (9th Cir.1983) (cert. denied), 465 U.S. 1080 , 104 S.Ct. 1445 , 79 L.Ed.2d 765 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mervyn Harold Cross A/K/A Eric Cross, and Robert Carter Lodge
See also United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633, 641 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1447 , 79 L.Ed.2d 766 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wages v. Internal Revenue Service
See, e.g., Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 699 F.2d 484, 485-86 (9th Cir.1983) (cert. denied), 465 U.S. 1080 , 104 S.Ct. 1445 , 79 L.Ed.2d 765 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Buttrum v. Black
While it is improper for the prosecution to comment on the defendant’s failure to testify, “it is not error ‘to comment on the failure of the defense, as opposed to the defendant, to counter or explain the evidence.’ ” Id. at 1321 , quoting United States v. Bright, 630 F.2d 804, 825 (5th Cir.1980) (emphasis added by Bright court); see also United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633, 650-51 (11th Cir.1983) (where defendants chose not to testify at trial but records available to the defense might have existed which would have contradicted the government’s theory of the case, prosecu-tori…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wallace v. State
See also United States v. Johnson , 713 F.2d 633 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied , 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1447 , 79 L.Ed.2d 766 (1984) (applying this test, the Johnson court determined that the appellant's motions were deficient and little more than bare conclusory allegations providing little clear indication of specific and exonerative facts about which the appellant's co-defendant would testify; the court further determined that the motions lacked credibility because the alleged testimony did not contravene the codefendant's penal interest).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alvin Gerson Levitt
See, e.g., United States v. Principato, 717 F.2d 1313, 1314 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1448 , 79 L.Ed.2d 767 (1984); Nicholas v. United States, 527 F.2d 1160, 1161 (9th Cir.1976); United States v. Kohlberg, 472 F.2d 1189 (9th Cir.1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wood
v.
Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc.
v.
Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc.
No. 83-5310.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 5, 1984.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.