green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.0 score
“employees of the banks can identify bank statements, cancelled checks and deposit slips which are prepared by or processed through the banks and can testify to their accuracy by comparing them to bank records.”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States of America and Keith R. Mueller, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Richard D. Clark, Cpa, and Joseph H. Thibodeau
employees of the banks can identify bank statements, cancelled checks and deposit slips which are prepared by or processed through the banks and can testify to their accuracy by comparing them to bank records.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Deloney
(2×)
It distinguished Bullington and Ramsey stating that “[a]t no point during the [defendants’] first capital sentencing hearing and appeal did either the sentencer or the reviewing court hold that the prosecution had ‘failed to prove its case’ that [defendants] deserved the death penalty.” Id. at 154.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Property, Parcel of Francisco Aguilar, Claimant-Appellant
See United States v. $2,500 in United States Currency, 689 F.2d 10 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied sub. nom., Aponte v. United States, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at 194 Quaker Farms Road
See United States v. $2,500 in United States Currency, 689 F.2d 10 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied sub. nom., Aponte v. United States, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at 194 Quaker Farms Road, Oxford, Connecticut
See United States v. $2,500 in United States Currency, 689 F.2d 10 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied sub. nom., Aponte v. United States, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Parcels of Real Property With the Building, Appurtenances, & Improvements Located at 255 Broadway, Hanover
See United States v. $2,500 in U.S. Currency, 689 F.2d 10, 16 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984) (in assessing probable cause for forfeiture, trial court properly considered $2,500 in cash as “substantially greater than is commonly kept in residential premises by law abiding wage earners”).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Spooner
See United States v. $2,500.00 in U.S. Currency, 689 F.2d 10 (2d Cir.1982), cert, denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 , reh’g denied, 466 U.S. 994 , 104 S.Ct. 2376 , 80 L.Ed.2d 848 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Premises Known as 2639 Meetinghouse
See United States v. $2,500.00 in U.S. Currency, 689 F.2d 10 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 , reh’g denied, 466 U.S. 994 , 104 S.Ct. 2376 , 80 L.Ed.2d 848 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Butcher
See United States v. Schlansky, 709 F.2d 1079 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984) (Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination does not excuse taxpayer’s production of accountant’s work papers because taxpayer is not compelled to repeat, restate, or affirm truth of contents of documents).
cited
Cited "see"
Hoffman v. Connecticut (In Re Willington Convalescent Home, Inc.)
See — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 1590 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984). 9 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kelly v. Sabretech Inc.
See, e.g., Jones v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, 681 F.2d 1376 (1982), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Erinkitola v. United States
See also United States v. $2,500 in U.S. Currency, 689 F.2d 10, 13 (2d Cir.1982) (stating in dicta that forfeiture of vehicles and money used in drug trafficking has a number of remedial, non-punitive purposes, including “impeding the success of the criminal enterprise by eliminating its resources and instrumentalities ... and helping to finance the government’s efforts to combat trafficking.”), cert. denied, Aponte v. U.S., 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bechtel Construction Co. v. Secretary of Labor
See, e.g., Jones v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Auth., 681 F.2d 1376, 1380 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated May 9, 1990
See also United States v. Schlansky, 709 F.2d 1079, 1083 (6th Cir.1983) (Boyd may still protect private diary), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984); In Re Grand Jury Proceedings (Johanson), 632 F.2d 1033, 1042-44 (3rd Cir.1980) (staunchly defending the vitality of Boyd , the history of the right against self-incrimination and holding that Fisher "in no way contradicts the proposition to which we today adhere: that the Fifth Amendment protects an accused from government-compelled disclosure of self-incriminating private papers, such as purely personal date books…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas F. Santoro Catherine Marie Santoro Thomas F. Santoro, as Guardian Ad Litem for Christopher Jason Ashley Santoro Claimants-Appellants, North Carolina Civil Liberties Union Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae, and 26.075 Acres, More or Less, Located in Swift Creek Township, Wake County, North Carolina, a Parcel of Real Property and All Improvements, Buildings, Structures, Fixtures, Furnishings, and Appurtenances Situated Thereon, Said Property Being Titled in the Name of Rosemarie D. Santoro and Any and All Proceeds From the Sale of Said Property, United States of America v. Rosemarie Santoro, Claimant-Appellant, North Carolina Civil Liberties Union Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae, and 26.075 Acres, More or Less, Located in Swift Creek Township, Wake County, North Carolina a Parcel of Real Property and All Improvements, Buildings, Structures, Fixtures, Furnishings, and Appurtenances Situated Thereon, Said Property Being Titled in the Name of Rosemarie D. Santoro and Any and All Proceeds From the Sale of Said Property, Thomas F. Santoro Catherine Marie Santoro Thomas F. Santoro, as Guardian Ad Litem for Christopher Jason Ashley Santoro
Sec. 881 (a)(6)); see also United States v. $2,500 in U.S. Currency, 689 F.2d 10, 13-14 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Santoro
United States v. Premises Known As 2639 Meetinghouse, 633 F.Supp. 979, 993-94 (E.D.Pa.1986) (construing 21 U.S.C. § 881 (a)(6)); see also United States v. $2,500 in U.S. Currency, 689 F.2d 10, 13-14 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Dennis v. United States
Compare, United States v. Schlansky, 709 F.2d 1079, 1082 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brogie v. State
See, e.g., Ake v. State, 663 P.2d 1 (Okl.Cr.1983) cert. den., — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 ; Cox v. State, 644 P.2d 1077 (Okl.Cr.1982); Goforth v. State, 644 P.2d 114 (Okl.Cr.1982); Maghe v. State, 620 P.2d 433 (Okl.Cr.1980); and Irvin v. State, 617 P.2d 588 (Okl.Cr.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
See, e.g., Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida, 719 F.2d 525, 538-39 (2d Cir.1983), cert. granted, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 1590 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984). (3) Circuit Court Jurisdiction EPA’s last jurisdictional defense is that the Court of Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction of test rule review.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Schlansky
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-227.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 19, 1984.
Cited by 19 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.