green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State of Tex. v. American Tobacco Co.
See Thompson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 714 F.2d 581, 583 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1102 , 104 S.Ct. 1598 , 80 L.Ed.2d 129 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Resolution Trust Corp. v. International Insurance
See Thompson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 714 F.2d 581, 583 (5th Cir.1983) (“departures [from earlier state law] are for the Louisiana courts, not for us”), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1102 , 104 S.Ct. 1598 , 80 L.Ed.2d 129 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
University System of New Hampshire v. United States Gypsum Co.
See Thompson v. Johns-Manville, 714 F.2d 581 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1102 , 104 S.Ct. 1598 , 80 L.Ed.2d 129 (1984); Dawson v. Bristol Labs, 658 F.Supp. 1036 (W.D.Ky.1876); Marshall v. Celotex, 651 F.Supp. 389 (E.D.Mich.1987); Griffin v. Tenneco Resins, 648 F.Supp. 964 (W.D.N.C.1986); Vigiolto v. Johns-Manville, supra; Morton v. Abbott Labs, 538 F.Supp. 593 (M.D.Fla.1982); Starling v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R., supra, 533 F.Supp. 183 ; Ryan v. Eli Lilly & Co., 514 F.Supp. 1004 (D.S.C.1981); Gray v. United States, 445 F.Supp. 337 (S.D.Tex.1978); Farmer v. Newport, 748 S.W.2d 162 (K…
discussed
Cited "see"
Case v. Fibreboard Corp.
See Thompson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 714 F.2d 581 (5th Cir.1983) cert. den. 465 U.S. 1102 , 104 S.Ct. 1598 , 80 L.Ed.2d 129 ; Hannon v. Waterman Steamship Corp., 567 F.Supp. 90 (E.D.La.1983); Prelick v. Johns-Manville Corp., 531 F.Supp. 96 (W.D.Pa.1982); Starling v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R., 533 F.Supp. 183 (S.D.Ga.1982); In re Related Asbestos Cases, 543 F.Supp. 1152 (N.D.Ca.1982); Celotex Corp. v. Copeland, 471 So.2d 533 (Fla.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Romano v. Lynch
See Thompson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 714 F.2d 581 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied 465 U.S. 1102 , 104 S.Ct. 1598 , 80 L.Ed.2d 129 (1984); White v. Thomas, 660 F.2d 680, 682-83 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 1027 , 102 S.Ct. 1731 , 72 L.Ed.2d 148 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Benjamin H. Blackston, Wilmer L. Ring, John N. Turner, James N. Tanksley and Foster G. Hickox v. Shook and Fletcher Insulation Co., Ac & S, Inc.
See Thompson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 714 F.2d 581, 583 (5th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 1598 , 80 L.Ed.2d 129 (1984); Hannon v. Waterman Steamship Corp., 567 F.Supp. 90, 92-93 (E.D.La.1983); In re Related Asbestos Cases, 543 F.Supp. 1152, 1158 (N.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Celotex Corp. v. Copeland
See Thompson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 714 F.2d 581 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 1598 , 80 L.Ed.2d 129 (1984) (asbestos); Burke v. Johns-Manville Corp., No. C-1-289 (S.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Santiago v. Sherwin-Williams Co.
See, e.g., Thompson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 714 F.2d 581, 583 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1102 , 104 S.Ct. 1598 , 80 L.Ed.2d 129 (1984) (refusing to apply enterprise liability because Louisiana courts had not addressed the issue); Lee v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., 721 F.Supp. 89, 94 (D.Md.1989), aff'd, 898 F.2d 146 (4th Cir.1990) (refusing to apply enterprise liability because plaintiff had failed to sue the *34 entire industry); Starling, 533 F.Supp. at 190-91 (relaxation of identification requirements should be left to the legislature); Ryan v. Eli Lilly & Co., 514 F.Supp. 10…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oreman Sales, Inc. v. Matsushita Electric Corp.
Compare Thompson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 714 F.2d 581, 583 (5th Cir.1983) (“departures [from earlier state law] are for the Louisiana courts, not for us”), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1102 , 104 S.Ct. 1598 , 80 L.Ed.2d 129 (1984) with Tallo, 544 So.2d at 455 (Schott, C.J., concurring) (any expansion of the duty in 9 to 5 should be solely by the Louisiana Supreme Court). 24 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shackil v. Lederle Laboratories
See, e.g., Thompson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 714 F. 2d 581, 583 (5th Cir.1983), cert. den. 465 U.S. 1102 , 104 S.Ct. 1598 , 80 L.Ed. 2d 129 (1984); Morton v. Abbott Laboratories, 538 F. Supp. 593, 599 (M.D.Fla. 1982); Mizell v. Eli Lilly & Co. 526 F. Supp. 589, 596 (D.S.C. 1981); Ryan v. Eli Lilly & Co., 514 F. Supp. 1004, 1018-1019 (D.S.C. 1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re \Agent Orange\" Product Liability Litigation"
See, e.g., Thompson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 714 F.2d 581, 583 (5th Cir.1983) (Sindell will not be applied “where a large group of defendants whose products [the plaintiff] did recall using remain before the court”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1598 , 80 L.Ed.2d 129 (1984); In re Related Asbestos Cases, 543 F.Supp. 1152, 1158 (N.D.Cal.1982) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smith
v.
Pennsylvania Board of Law Examiners
v.
Pennsylvania Board of Law Examiners
No. 83-1188.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 19, 1984.
Published
Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.