green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.3 score
“the general rule is that defendants who are jointly indicted should be tried together, and this rule applies with particular force to conspiracy cases.”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Gray
the general rule is that defendants who are jointly indicted should be tried together, and this rule applies with particular force to conspiracy cases.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jorge Guerra
See United States v. Walker, 720 F.2d 1527, 1538 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied sub nom., Gustin v. United States, 465 U.S. 1108 , 104 S.Ct. 1614 , 80 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Garry D. Kern, United States of America v. Troy P. Reeves
See United States v. Walker, 720 F.2d 1527, 1535 (11th Cir.1983) (refusing to impute the knowledge of state officials to a federal prosecutor), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1108 , 104 S.Ct. 1614 , 80 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hays v. State
See United States v. Walker , 720 F.2d 1527 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, Gustin v. United States , 465 U.S. 1108 , 104 S.Ct. 1614 , 80 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984) (' Brady does require that the information requested be known to the prosecution.' Walker , supra, p. 1535 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Moses Tootick, United States of America v. Charles Evans Frank
See United States v. Walker, 720 F.2d 1527, 1533 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1108 , 104 S.Ct. 1614 , 80 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984); Parker v. United States, 404 F.2d 1193, 1196 (9th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 1004 , 89 S.Ct. 1602 , 22 L.Ed.2d 782 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Shearer v. State
See United States v. Walker, 720 F.2d 1527 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1108 , 104 S.Ct. 1614 , 80 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenny Roper, William Price, William Belcher, Jim Childress, William Green
See United States v. Walker, 720 F.2d 1527 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1108 , 104 S.Ct. 1614 , 80 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984) (where the court inferred that defendants understood their purpose was to consummate an illegal narcotics deal where they arrived at a site and *788 began unloading bales of marijuana from the trunk of one vehicle into the trunk of another).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond Casamayor, United States of America v. Carroll Key, Carol Hardin, Janet Cates, Michael Cates, Raymond Casamayor, Russell Barker, John R. Roberts, Buford E. Clark, Michael Alan Clark, Aristides M. Brito, Miguel Brito-Williams, Antonio Diaz
See United States v. Walker, 720 F.2d 1527, 1533-34 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1108 , 104 S.Ct. 1614 , 80 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Casamayor
See United States v. Walker, 720 F.2d 1527, 1533-34 (11th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1108 , 104 S.Ct. 1614 , 80 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Curry v. State
See United States v. Walker , 720 F.2d 1527 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, Gustin v. United States , 465 U.S. 1108 , 104 S.Ct. 1614 , 80 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984); Killough v. State , 438 So.2d 311 (Ala.Crim.App. 1982), rev'd on other grounds, 438 So.2d 333 (Ala. 1983), on remand 438 So.2d 336 (Ala.Crim.App.), and cases cited therein.
discussed
Cited "see"
Frazier v. State
See United States v. Walker , 720 F.2d 1527 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, Gustin v. United States , 465 U.S. 1108 , 104 S.Ct. 1614 , 80 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984) (" Brady does require that the information requested be known to the prosecution." Walker , supra, p. 1535 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Adams
See United States v. Walker, 720 F.2d 1527, 1538 (11th Cir.1983) (the existence of a conspiracy may be proved by circumstantial evidence, including inferences from the conduct of the alleged participants), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1108 , 104 S.Ct. 1614 , 80 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Adams
See United States v. Walker, 720 F.2d 1527, 1538 (11th Cir.1983) (the existence of a conspiracy may be proved by circumstantial evidence, including inferences from the conduct of the alleged participants), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1108 , 104 S.Ct. 1614 , 80 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Panzardi-Alvarez
See United States v. Walker, 720 F.2d 1527, 1533 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1108 , 80 L.Ed.2d 143 , 104 S.Ct. 1614 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Andres Valle-Ferrer
See, United States v. Walker, 720 F.2d 1527, 1539-40 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1614 , 80 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Simmons
Moreover, joinder is preferred in conspiracy cases, cf. United States v. Richardson, 167 F.3d 621, 624 (D.C.Cir.1999) (“Joint trials are favored in RICO cases.”); see also United States v. Walker, 720 F.2d 1527, 1533 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1108 , 104 S.Ct. 1614 , 80 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984) (noting that the “general rule” that jointly indicted defendants are to be jointly tried “applies with particular force to conspiracy cases”), and are heavily favored in this Circuit.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eiland
Moreover, joinder is preferred in conspiracy cases, cf. United States v. Richardson, 167 F.3d 621, 624 (D.C.Cir.1999) (“Joint trials are favored in RICO cases.”); see also United States v. Walker, 720 F.2d 1527, 1533 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1108 , 104 S.Ct. 1614 , 80 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984) (noting that the “general rule” that jointly indicted defendants are to be jointly tried “applies with particular force to conspiracy cases”), and are heavily favored in this Circuit.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia
See Philadelphia WRO v. Shapp, 602 F.2d at 1120-21 (finding good faith and permitting modification); Plyler v. Evatt, 846 F.2d at 213 (same); see also Duran v. Elrod, 713 F.2d 292 (7th Cir.1983) (finding that the state was deliberately trying to avoid compliance and denying modification), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1108 , 104 S.Ct. 1615 , 80 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Stelpflug v. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul
See also Duran v. Elrod, 713 F.2d 292, 294-95 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1108 , 104 S.Ct. 1615 , 80 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
14 Collier bankr.cas.2d 1190, Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,142 David J. Stelpflug and Shirley M. Stelpflug, Debtors-Appellants v. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul, Creditor-Appellee
See also Duran v. Elrod, 713 F.2d 292, 294-95 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1108 , 104 S.Ct. 1615 , 80 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert S. Palow, United States of America v. Paul C. Alvarado
See, e.g., United States v. Walker, 720 F.2d 1527, 1539-40 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, Gustin v. United States, 465 U.S. 1108 , 104 S.Ct. 1614 , 80 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984) (informant’s testimony admissible because reward was not dependent upon making a case against particular persons specified in advance); United States v. Gray, 626 F.2d 494, 499 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1091 , 101 S.Ct. 887 , 66 L.Ed.2d 820 (1981) (same).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Ervin Dekle, Dwight Ragans, and Ronald Mangle, Defendants
See Corbin, supra; see also U.S. v. Walker, 720 F.2d 1527 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1614 , 80 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984). 3.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jesus Martin Lopez
See, e.g., United States v. Walker, 720 F.2d 1527,1541 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 1614 , 80 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
v.
Kelly
v.
Kelly
No. 82-1749.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 19, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: District of Columbia (1)
C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.