green
Positive treatment
1.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baker v. Pataki
Compare Hill v. Lockhart, 764 F.2d 1279 (8th Cir.1984) (in banc) (affirming per curiam without opinions on the merits), aff'd, 474 U.S. 52 , 106 S.Ct. 366 , 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985), and Penthouse Int'l, Ltd. v. McAuliffe, 717 F.2d 517 (11th Cir.1983) (in banc) (same), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1108 , 104 S.Ct. 1615 , 80 L.Ed.2d 144 (1984), with Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 25 v. Smith, 846 F.2d 1499 (D.C.Cir.1988) (in banc) (per curiam affirmance accompanied by separate opinions on the merits); United States v. Klubock, 832 F.2d 664 (1st Cir.1987) (in banc) (same); Roesch, Inc. v. Star…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baker v. Pataki
Compare Hill v. Lockhart, 764 F.2d 1279 (8th Cir.1984) (in banc) (affirming per curiam without opinions on the merits), aff'd, 474 U.S. 52 , 106 S.Ct. 366 , 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985), and Penthouse Int'l, Ltd. v. McAuliffe, 717 F.2d 517 (11th Cir.1983) (in banc) (same), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1108 , 104 S.Ct. 1615 , 80 L.Ed.2d 144 (1984), with Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 25 v. Smith, 846 F.2d 1499 (D.C.Cir.1988) (in banc) (per curiam affirmance accompanied by separate opinions on the merits); United States v. Klubock, 832 F.2d 664 (1st Cir.1987) (in banc) (same); Roesch, Inc. v. Star…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McAuliffe
v.
Penthouse International Ltd.
v.
Penthouse International Ltd.
No. 83-1160.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 19, 1984.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of Charles H. Keating, Jr., et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certio-rari denied.