green
Positive treatment
7.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Woodward
See United States v. Gibson, 726 F.2d 869 -874 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960 , 104 S.Ct. 2174 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984), pointing out that "reasonable doubt” definitions have a tendency to provoke unnecessary litigation.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Joe Taylor, United States of America v. Chardale Arnaz Bowe, United States of America v. Eric Lamont Hutchinson
See United States v. Gibson, 726 F.2d 869, 874 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960 , 104 S.Ct. 2174 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984); United States v. McBride, 786 F.2d 45, 52 (2d Cir.1986); United States v. Porter, 821 F.2d 968, 973 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 , 108 S.Ct. 1108 , 99 L.Ed.2d 269 (1988); United States v. Hunt, 794 F.2d 1095 , 1100 n. 4, 1101 (5th Cir.1986); United States v. Hall, 854 F.2d 1036, 1038-39 (7th Cir.1988); United States v. Velasquez, 980 F.2d 1275, 1278-79 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2979 , 125 L.Ed.2d 677 (1993); United States v. Bar…
cited
Cited "see"
Terry Brian Tower v. O.J. Phillips
See United States v. French, 719 F.2d 387, 390 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960 , 104 S.Ct. 2174 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert L. McGill
See United States v. Gibson, 726 F.2d 869, 874 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960 , 104 S.Ct. 2174 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward B. Ellis, A/K/A Rocco Ellis
See United States v. Gibson, 726 F.2d 869, 874 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960 , 104 S.Ct. 2174 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Iona M. Moore
See United States v. Gibson, 726 F.2d 869, 874 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960 , 104 S.Ct. 2174 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984) (court’s “substantively correct” charge need not “follow the exact form and wording of the defendant’s proposed instructions”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Patrick Tata, Jr. v. Norman Carver
See United States v. Gibson, 726 F.2d 869 , 874 *673 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960 , 104 S.Ct. 2174 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984); see also Keeble v. United States, 412 U.S. 205, 208 , 93 S.Ct. 1993, 1995 , 36 L.Ed.2d 844 (1973) (lesser included offense instruction warranted when reasonable view of evidence would permit jury to find defendant committed the lesser, but not the greater, offense).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Andrews Bruce Campbell
Accord United States v. Gibson, 726 F.2d 869, 874 (1st Cir.) (“It can be said beyond any doubt that the words ‘reasonable doubt’ do not lend themselves to accurate definition.”), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960 , 104 S.Ct. 2174 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jack C. Turner
See generally United States v. Bent, 707 F.2d 1190, 1195 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960 , 104 S.Ct. 2174 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984) (review of supplemental jury instruction involves review of all instructions given to determine whether instructions as a whole accurately presented the law).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. George Olmstead
Accord United States v. Gibson, 726 F.2d 869, 874 (1st Cir.) (“It can be said beyond any doubt that the words ‘reasonable doubt’ do not lend themselves to accurate definition.”), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960 , 104 S.Ct. 2174 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel Anderson Burkett
See United States v. Bent, 707 F.2d 1190, 1194 (11th Cir.1983) (when portions of direct testimony suggested legitimate reasons for prior acts, defendant opened the door to cross-examination on these acts), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960 , 104 S.Ct. 2174 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984); United States v. Hernandez, 646 F.2d 970, 977-78 (5th Cir.) (cross-examination as to defendant’s familiarity with drugs reasonably suggested by his denial on direct examination that he knew the contents of the packages containing methaqualone), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 638 , 70 L.Ed.2d 617 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Camel Hair and Cashmere Institute of America, Inc. v. Associated Dry Goods Corporation, D/B/A Lord & Taylor
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686, 692 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971); Smith v. Montoro, 648 F.2d 602, 607 (9th Cir.1981); Thorn v. Reliance Van Co., Inc., 736 F.2d 929, 933 (3rd Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Anello, United States of America v. Daniel Duval, United States of America v. James Michael Oliver, United States of America v. David Root, United States of America v. John Sachs, United States of America v. Fred R. Verderame, United States of America v. Walter Wendolkowski, United States of America v. Gervasio Guillen, A/K/A Jorge Ortiz-Germasio
See United States v. Gibson, 726 F.2d 869, 874 (1st Cir.) ("The trial court's charge to the jury need not follow the exact form and wording of the defendant's proposed instructions."), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 2174 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984). 57 c.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anello
See United States v. Gibson, 726 F.2d 869, 874 (1st Cir.) (“The trial court’s charge to the jury need not follow the exact form and wording of the defendant’s proposed instructions.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2174 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984). c.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Perry
See also United States v. Gibson, 726 F.2d 869, 874 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960 , 104 S.Ct. 2174 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984) (stating that “[t]he refusal to give a particular requested instruction * * * is reversible error only if ‘the instruction (1) is substantively correct; (2) was not substantially covered in the charge actually delivered to the jury; and (3) concerns an important point in the trial so that the failure to give it seriously impaired the defendant’s ability to effectively present a given defense’ ”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Perez
See, e.g., United States v. Gibson, 726 F.2d 869, 874 (1st Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 466 U.S. 960 , 104 S.Ct. 2174 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984) (reasoning that a portion of the FJC instruction "might possibly engender some confusion as to the burden of proof,” although adopting an instruction similar to the version adopted by the circuit court in this case, but including the language "[i]f the two conclusions can reasonably be drawn from the evidence, one of innocence and one of guilt, the jury should adopt the one of innocence” at the end of the instruction); United States v. Reese, 33 F.3d 16…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. United States
(2×)
Attempts to improve upon the definition all too often fail to achieve the goal of clarity and result in constitutional challenges. [5] See Butler, *1362 646 A.2d at 336 (citing Holland v. United States, supra note 5, 75 S.Ct. at 137-38, 348 U.S. at 140; Taylor, supra note 5, 302 U.S.App.D.C. at 356, 997 F.2d at 1558) (citation omitted); see also United States v. Gibson, 726 F.2d 869, 874 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960 , 104 S.Ct. 2174 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frank Arache
See also United States v. Gibson, 726 F.2d 869, 872 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960 , 104 S.Ct. 2174 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ronald J. Perholtz, United States of America v. Franklin W. Jackson, United States of America v. Gregory W. Fletcher
In light of Dillon's prior testimony on payments to Jackson and Fletcher, Jackson’s direct testimony about trips to the Islands to invest in real estate, his statement concerning his presence with Fletcher in banks on the Islands, and the prosecutor’s information about Fletcher’s account, the questions were based on a “well reasoned suspicion,” and do not amount to an “improbable flight of fancy.” United States v. Pugh, 436 F.2d 222, 225 (D.C.Cir.1970); see also United States v. Bent, 707 F.2d 1190, 1194 (11th Cir.1983) (where defendant implied that pri- or trips into the United …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sturm
See, e.g., United States v. Gibson, 726 F.2d 869 , 873 n. 2 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960 , 104 S.Ct. 2174 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984) (instruction that “Hobbs Act forbids, if other essential elements are proved, officials taking money for their own purposes, that is, lining their own pockets in order to preserve labor peace” held correct); United States v. Brecht, 540 F.2d 45 (purchasing agent violated Hobbs Act by obtaining kickback as condition of award of contract).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Houston v. Lack
See also United States v. French, 719 F.2d 387 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960 , 104 S.Ct. 2174 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1983) (failure to inform of “binding” plea agreement rule); United States v. Santelises, 509 F.2d 703 (2d Cir.1975) (failure to inform of possible deportation).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
French
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-6216.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 30, 1984.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.