green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Rhoades v. Powell
But see United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120, 1124 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 973 , 104 S.Ct. 2349 , 80 L.Ed.2d 822 (1984) (criminal RICO conspiracy requires no overt act).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lujan
(2×)
See United States v. Litton Systems, Inc., 722 F.2d 264 (5th Cir.) (delay resulting from defendant’s efforts to resolve case by plea bargain not chargeable to state where parties agreed that neither side would make any move to alter status quo of case), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 973 , 104 S.Ct. 2349 , 80 L.Ed.2d 822 (1984); State v. Pippin, 72 N.C.App. 387 , 324 S.E.2d 900 (1985) (the defendant’s attorney requested that no indictment be brought against the defendant while plea negotiations were being discussed; court held that any time periods actually attributable to the defendant’s reques…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John M. Brown
Additionally, it was noted that Rule 12(e) allows the court to consider factual issues in determining a pretrial motion. 9 Id.; see United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120, 1123 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 973 , 104 S.Ct. 2349 , 80 L.Ed.2d 822 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
State Bar of Nevada v. Claiborne
See United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 973 , 104 S.Ct. 2349 , 80 L.Ed.2d 822 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Persico
See United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120, 1124 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 973 , 104 S.Ct. 2439 , 80 L.Ed.2d 822 (1984); United States v. Castellano, 610 F.Supp. 1359, 1384 (S.D.N.Y.1985); but see United States v. Torres Lopez, 656 F.Supp. 257, 262 (D.P.R.1987) (government must show one overt act by any conspirator in furtherance of conspiracy within limitations period).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Persico
See United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120, 1124 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 973 , 104 S.Ct. 2439 , 80 L.Ed.2d 822 (1984); United States v. Castellano, 610 F.Supp. 1359, 1384 (S.D.N.Y.1985); but see United States v. Torres Lopez, 656 F.Supp. 257, 262 (D.P.R.1987) (government must show one overt act by any conspirator in furtherance of conspiracy within limitations period).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Angelo Pepe and Thomas Miglionico, United States of America v. Albert Joseph Facchiano, Francis Santo, Paul Santo
See United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120, 1123 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2349 , 80 L.Ed.2d 822 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hemme
See, e.g., United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120, 1123 (11th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 466 U.S. 973 , 104 S.Ct. 2349 , 80 L.Ed.2d 822 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Prentice
See, e.g., United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120, 1123 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 973 , 104 S.Ct. 2349 , 80 L.Ed.2d 822 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Senogles
See, e.g., United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120, 1123 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 973 , 104 S.Ct. 2349 , 80 L.Ed.2d 822 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hughson
See, e.g., United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120, 1123 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 973 , 104 S.Ct. 2349 , 80 L.Ed.2d 822 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ruiz-Castro
See, e.g., United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120, 1123 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 973 , 104 S.Ct. 2349 , 80 L.Ed.2d 822 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Higareda-Ramirez
See, e.g., United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120,1123 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 973 , 104 S.Ct. 2349 , 80 L.Ed.2d 822 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Finn
See, e.g., United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120, 1123 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 973 , 104 S.Ct. 2349 , 80 L.Ed.2d 822 (1984). b.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Holly Brock, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Elledge, 723 F.2d 864, 866 (11th Cir.1984). 4 *1445 “With respect to conspiracy statutes [such as sections 846 and 963] that do not require proof of an overt act,____[t]he conspiracy may be deemed to continue as long as its purposes have neither been abandoned nor accomplished.” United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120, 1124 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2349 , 80 L.Ed.2d 822 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Adams
v.
Providence & Worcester Co.
v.
Providence & Worcester Co.
No. 83-1556.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 14, 1984.
Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.