green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.7 score
“a defendant does not have a vested right in the application of a given remedial scheme.... he amendments do not impose an additional duty on ; only the measure of damages that result from the violation of a duty has changed.”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Pani
a defendant does not have a vested right in the application of a given remedial scheme.... he amendments do not impose an additional duty on ; only the measure of damages that result from the violation of a duty has changed.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Huffman v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.
Section 13-21-101(1) explicitly makes the award of prejudgment interest “the duty of the court.” Further, “[a]s construed, this provision imparts no discretion to the trial court; it must be applied to any judgment resulting from an action for personal injuries.” Stemple v. Phillips Petroleum Company, 430 F.2d 178, 184 (10th Cir. 1970), citing Johnson v. Enlow, 132 Colo. 101 , 286 P.2d 630 (1955). *912 A case on point is Meller v. Heil Company, 745 F.2d 1297 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1206 , 104, S.Ct. 2390, 81 L.Ed.2d 347 (1984), Jessie Meller’s husband Jean was killed …
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
See Safir v. Dole, 718 F.2d 475, 480 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1206 , 104 S.Ct. 2389 , 81 L.Ed.2d 347 (1984), Irons v. Diamond, supra, Melong v. Micronesian Claims Com’n, 643 F.2d 10 , 17 (D.C.Cir.1980) (quoting White v. Murtha, 377 F.2d 428, 432 (5th Cir.1967)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Evans v. Board of County Commissioners of County of Boulder, Colorado
Qualls, Inc. v. Berryman, 789 P.2d 1095, 1099 (Colo.1990); Lockhart v. Board of Educ., 735 P.2d 913, 918 (Colo. App.1986); accord Meller v. Heil Co., 745 F.2d 1297, 1304-05 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1206 , 104 S.Ct. 2390 , 81 L.Ed.2d 347 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
SGW, Inc. v. United States
Accord Meller v. Heil Co., 745 F.2d 1297, 1304-05 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1206 , 104 S.Ct. 2390 , 81 L.Ed.2d 347 (1984); Silverlight v. Huggins, 488 F.2d 107, 109-10 (3rd Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Sommers Drug Stores Co. Employee Profit Sharing Trust, Cross-Appellant v. Corrigan Enterprises, Inc. And Walter N. Corrigan, Cross-Appellees
See Carlton v. Shelton, 722 F.2d 203 , 205 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1206 , 104 S.Ct. 2389 , 81 L.Ed.2d 347 (1984); cf Boeing Co. v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365, 374-75 (5th Cir. 1969) (en banc) (applying standard to motions for directed verdict and j.n.o.v.).
cited
Cited "see"
Carlton v. Baww, Inc.
See Carlton v. Shelton, 722 F.2d 203 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2389 , 81 L.Ed.2d 347 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Carlton v. Baww, Inc.
See Carlton v. Shelton, 722 F.2d 203 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 2389 , 81 L.Ed.2d 347 (1984). 4 Pretrial matters in this suit proceeded until early February of 1983.
discussed
Cited "see"
Stone Mountain Game Ranch, Inc. v. Hunt
Shillingford v. Holmes, 634 F.2d 263, 265 (5th Cir.1981); see Suthoff v. Yazoo County, 637 F.2d 337, 340 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1157 , 102 S.Ct. 1032 , 71 L.Ed.2d 316 (1982), and — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 2389 , 81 L.Ed.2d 347 (1984); Williams v. Kelley, 624 F.2d 695, 698 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1019 , 101 S.Ct. 3009 , 69 L.Ed.2d 391 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stone Mountain Game Ranch, Inc. v. Hunt, III
Shillingford v. Holmes, 634 F.2d 263, 265 (5th Cir.1981); see Suthoff v. Yazoo County, 637 F.2d 337, 340 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1157 , 102 S.Ct. 1032 , 71 L.Ed.2d 316 (1982), and --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 2389 , 81 L.Ed.2d 347 (1984); Williams v. Kelley, 624 F.2d 695, 698 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1019 , 101 S.Ct. 3009 , 69 L.Ed.2d 391 (1981). 14 In that Game Ranch's claims of unconstitutional deprivation are predicated on the defendants' breach of such a duty, its claims must fall.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Enviroglas Products, Inc. v. Enviroglas Products, LLC
“The federal courts are under *565 an independent obligation to examine their own jurisdiction, and standing is perhaps the most important of [the jurisdictional] doctrines.” United States v. Hays, 515 U.S. 737, 742 , 115 S.Ct. 2431 , 132 L.Ed.2d 635 (1995) (quoting FW/PBS, Inc. v. Dallas, 493 U.S. 215, 230-231 , 110 S.Ct. 596 , 107 L.Ed.2d 603 (1990)) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Sommers Drug Stores Company Employee Profit Sharing Trust v. Corrigan, 883 F.2d 345, 348 (5th Cir.1989) (“ ‘Standing, since it goes to the very power of the court to act, must exist at all sta…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bell v. American Traffic Solutions, Inc.
“The federal courts are under an independent obligation to examine their own jurisdiction, and standing is perhaps the most important of [the jurisdictional] doctrines.” United States v. Hays, 515 U.S. 737, 742 , 115 S.Ct. 2431 , 132 L.Ed.2d 635 (1995) (quoting FW/PBS, Inc. v. Dallas, 493 U.S. 215, 230-231 , 110 S.Ct. 596 , 107 L.Ed.2d 603 (1990)) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Sommers Drug Stores Company Employee Profit Sharing Trust v. Corrigan, 883 F.2d 345, 348 (5th Cir.1989) (“ ‘Standing, since it goes to the very power of the court to act, must exist at all stages o…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
International Transactions, Ltd. v. Embotelladora Agral Regiomontana, S.A. De C.V.
Moreover, federal courts are “under an independent obligation to examine their own jurisdiction, and standing is perhaps the most important of [the jurisdictional] doctrines.” Hays, 515 U.S. at 742 , 115 S.Ct. 2431 (quoting FW/PBS, Inc. v. Dallas, 493 U.S. *677 215, 230-31, 110 S.Ct. 596 , 107 L.Ed.2d 603 (1990)) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Corrigan, 883 F.2d at 348 (“Standing, since it goes to the very power of the court to act, must exist at all stages of the proceeding”) (quoting Safir v. Dole, 718 F.2d 475, 481 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1206 , 104 S.Ct…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stevens v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad
See, e.g., Meller v. Heil Co., 745 F.2d 1297, 1303 (10th Cir.) (excluding evidence of the decedent’s drug use in a wrongful death action in part *600 due to the absence of a medical foundation for the defendant’s claim that the decedent’s life expectancy would have been diminished by his drug use), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1206 , 104 S.Ct. 2390 , 81 L.Ed.2d 347 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dufrayne v. FTB Mortgage Services, Inc. (In Re Dufrayne)
See e.g., Safir v. Dole, 718 F.2d 475, 480-81 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1206 , 104 S.Ct. 2389 , 81 L.Ed.2d 347 (1984); In re PCH Associates, 122 B.R. 7, 9 (S.D.N.Y.1990), vacated on different grounds, 949 F.2d 585 (2d Cir.1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Russell v. Russell (In Re Russell)
See also, Schwegmann v. Schwegmann, 441 So.2d 316 (La.App. 5th Cir.1983), writ den. 443 So.2d 1122 (La. 1984), cert. den., 467 U.S. 1206 , 104 S.Ct. 2389 , 81 L.Ed.2d 347 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robinson v. Coastal Family Health Center, Inc.
See e.g., Suthoff v. Yazoo County Industrial Development Corp., 722 F.2d 133 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1206 , 104 S.Ct. 2389 , 81 L.Ed.2d 347 (1984) (abuse of process claim barred by Section 15-1-35).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Schwegmann, aka Blackledge
v.
Schwegmann
v.
Schwegmann
No. 83-1630.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 21, 1984.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
Ct. App. La., 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.