green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Hoffman v. Tuten
See United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 , 94 & n. 4 (4th Cir.) 1984, cert. denied, Schronce v. United States, 467 U.S. 1208 , 104 S.Ct. 2395 , 81 L.Ed.2d 352 (1984); and Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 , 845-847 & nn. 1-3 (4th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anderson
See United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 , 94 & n. 4 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, Schronce v. United States, 467 U.S. 1208 , 104 S.Ct. 2395 , 81 L.Ed.2d 352 (1984); and Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 , 845-847 & nn. 1-3 (4th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Ashcroft
See United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 , 94 n. 4 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, Schronce v. United States, 467 U.S. 1208 , 104 S.Ct. 2395 , 81 L.Ed.2d 352 (1984); and Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 , 845-847 nn. 1-3 (4th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eilertson v. United States
See United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 , 94 & n.4 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, Schronce v. United States, 467 U.S. 1208 , 104 S.Ct. 2395 , 81 L.Ed.2d 352 (1984); and Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 , 845-47 & nn. 1-3 (4th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cooper v. Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings, Inc.
See United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 , 94 & n. 4 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, Schronce v. United States, 467 U.S. 1208 , 104 S.Ct. 2395 , 81 L.Ed.2d 352 (1984); and Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 , 845-847 & nn. 1-3 (4th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
House v. Aiken County National Bank
See United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 , 94 & n. 4 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, Schronce v. United States, 467 U.S. 1208 [ 104 S.Ct. 2395 , 81 L.Ed.2d 352 ] (1984); and Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 , 845-47 & nn. 1-3 (4th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richland-Lexington Airport District v. Atlas Properties, Inc.
See United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1208 , 104 S.Ct. 2395 , 81 L.Ed.2d 352 (1984). 10 . 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346 (a)(2), 1491(a)(1) are popularly known as the Tucker Act.
cited
Cited "see"
Stubbs v. Hunter
See United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 (4th Cir.) cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1208 [ 104 S.Ct. 2395 , 81 L.Ed.2d 352 ] (1984), and Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 (4th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Errol F. Remsing and Jerry H. Defoor
See United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1208 , 104 S.Ct. 2395 , 81 L.Ed.2d 352 (1984) (Congress had lodged the primary responsibility for supervision of the federal magistrate’s functions with the district court).
discussed
Cited "see"
William Templeman and Alyce Templeman v. Chris Craft Corporation
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Scott v. Schweiker, 702 F.2d 13, 14 (1st Cir.1983); Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 616 F.2d 603, 605 (1st Cir.1980); accord United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 , 94 & n. 4 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 2395 , 81 L.Ed.2d 352 (1984); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir.1981); cf. John B.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Election Commission v. Christian Coalition
See also United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied 467 U.S. 1208 , 104 S.Ct. 2395 , 81 L.Ed.2d 352 (1984) (finding that without enforcement of waiver rule, litigant might bypass district court review). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Abraham Egert and Christine Kraft-Egert v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and Employee Benefit Plan of the Canteen Corporation
See, e.g., United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 93-94 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1208 , 104 S.Ct. 2395 , 81 L.Ed.2d 352 (1984); Nettles, 677 F.2d at 406-10; United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir.1981); Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 616 F.2d 603, 604-05 (1st Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Henry Hudson v. Nabisco Brands, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 93 (4th Cir.) ("Neither the legislative history of the Act nor Sec. 636(b)(1) itself ... specifically addresses the potential consequences a party will suffer if he fails to file the written objections authorized by the last paragraph of that subsection."), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 2395 , 81 L.Ed.2d 352 (1984); Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404, 407 (5th Cir.1982) (en banc) ("Absent from the statute is any statement as to the effect on appeal of a party's failure to object to the magistrate's findings where those findings are s…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Miller
v.
Cuyler, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution
v.
Cuyler, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution
No. 83-6546.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 21, 1984.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.