green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Battle
See United States v. McAnlis, 721 F.2d 334, 336 (11th Cir.1983), cert, denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2681 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Carter v. State
See Carter v. State, 442 So.2d 150 (Ala.Cr.App.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2682 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cooks
See United States v. Jennings, 724 F.2d 436 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227, 104 S.Ct. 2682 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984) (no abuse of discretion in denying evidentiary hearing on selective prosecution in absence of prima facie case of selective prosecution). 25 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Upton
See United States v. McAnlis, 721 F.2d 334, 336-37 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2681 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984) (I.R.S. fulfills statutory duty by issuing summons prior to establishment of liability); Uhrig v. United States, 592 F.Supp. 349, 353 (D.Md. 1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sparks
(2×)
See United States v. Jennings, 724 F.2d 436, 445 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2682 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Abrahams
See United States v. McAnlis, 721 F.2d 334, 337 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227, 104 S.Ct. 2681 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984); United States v. Roundtree, 420 F.2d 845, 849-50 (5th Cir.1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Abrahams
See United States v. McAnlis, 721 F.2d 334, 337 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2681 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984); United States v. Roundtree, 420 F.2d 845, 849-50 (5th Cir.1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Howard Johnson Co. v. Khimani
However, once the moving party makes a prima facie showing that the court order was violated, the burden of production shifts to the alleged contemnor to show a “present inability to comply that goes ‘beyond a mere assertion of inability_’ ” Combs, 785 F.2d at 984 (quoting United States v. Hayes, 722 F.2d 723, 725 (11th Cir.1984); see United States v. McAnlis, 721 F.2d 334, 337 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2681 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Howard Johnson Company, Inc. v. Amir Khimani
However, once the moving party makes a prima facie showing that the court order was violated, the burden of production shifts to the alleged contemnor to show a "present inability to comply that goes 'beyond a mere assertion of inability....' " Combs, 785 F.2d at 984 (quoting United States v. Hayes, 722 F.2d 723, 725 (11th Cir.1984); see United States v. McAnlis, 721 F.2d 334, 337 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2681 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Norton, United States of America v. Paul Fosco, James Pinckard, Paul A. Di Franco, James Norton, Defendants
The witness who prepared the summary chart explained that payments made to these two doctors were, in effect, payments to DYCC since they provided health care services as independent contractors for DVCC pursuant to DYCC’s contract with the Florida Trust Fund. “[T]he essential requirement is not that the charts be free from reliance on any assumptions, but rather that these assumptions be supported by evidence in the record.” United States v. Diez, 515 F.2d at 905 ; accord United States v. Jennings, 724 F.2d 436, 442 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2682 , 81 L.Ed.2d 8…
cited
Cited "see"
Sloan v. United States
See United States v. McAnlis, 721 F.2d 334, 336 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2681 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984); Uhrig v. United States, 592 F.Supp. 349, 353 (D.Md.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Solow
However, once the moving party makes a prima facie showing that the court order was violated, the burden of production shifts to the alleged contemnor to show a “present inability to comply that goes ‘beyond a mere assertion of inability. " Combs v. Ryan’s Coal Co., Inc., 785 F.2d 970 , 984 (1986) (quoting United States v. Hayes, 722 F.2d 723, 725 (11th Cir.1984)); see also United States v. McAnlis, 721 F.2d 334, 337 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2681 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Subpoena of Roger Gimbel by Fdic as Receiver for First New York Bank for Business. Roger Gimbel v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
See, e.g., United States v. McAnlis, 721 F.2d 334, 336 (11th Cir.1983) (applying Powell standard to IRS summons for personal tax records), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2681 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984); United States v. Roundtree, 420 F.2d 845, 851 (5th Cir.1969) (holding that “we are satisfied that the Commissioner meets the standard of probable cause when he meets the requirements of Powell ”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Miller
See also Johnston v. State, 673 P.2d 844 (Okla.Crim.App.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2682 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984); State v. Carvalho, 122 R.I. 461 , 409 A.2d 132 (1979); State v. Studham, 572 P.2d 700 (Utah 1977); Lhost v. State, 85 Wis.2d 620 , 271 N.W.2d 121 (1978); Evans v. State, 655 P.2d 1214 (Wyo.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Medicare&medicaid Gu 34,654 United States of America v. Paul G. Brown, United States of America v. Stone's Pharmacy, Inc.
See also United States v. Jennings, 724 F.2d 436, 447-48 (5th Cir.) (citing Griffin in- reaching identical holding in context of submission of false claims for meals served to children), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2682 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984); First Alabama Bank v. Donovan, 692 F.2d 714, 718-20 (11th Cir.1982) (finding consent to reviews by Department of Labor of bank’s employment records to determine compliance with antidiscrimination regulations).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mothershed
v.
California
v.
California
No. 83-6282.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 4, 1984.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.