green
Positive treatment
7.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Contreras
(2×)
Similarly, in United States v. Cooper, 733 F.2d 1360, 1362 , (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 (1984), defendant Darryl Threat, who was convicted of aiding and abetting the passing of counterfeit money, argued to this Circuit the jury selection process did not insure "a jury selected at random from a fair cross section of the community." Id. at 1366.
cited
Cited "see"
Oliver v. Woods
See United States v. Cooper, 733 F.2d 1360, 1363 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carter
See United States v. Bedonie, 913 F.2d 782, 794 (10th Cir.1990) (“Section 1867(e) ‘provides the exclusive means for a party charged with a federal crime to challenge a jury.’”) (quoting United States v. Cooper, 733 F.2d 1360, 1366 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 (1984)), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1253 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ricky Carter
See United States v. Bedonie, 913 F.2d 782, 794 (10th Cir.1990) 25 ("Section 1867(e) 26 'provides the exclusive means for a party charged with a 27 federal crime to challenge a jury.' ") (quoting United States v. Cooper, 733 F.2d 1360, 1366 (10th Cir.) 28 , cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 , 104 S.Ct. 3543 , 82 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984) 29 ), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1253 (1991). 30 In criminal cases, § 1867 requires a party challenging the jury selection process to make his challenge by motion "before the voir dire examination begins, or within seven days after the defendant discovered or could have disco…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ortiz
See United States v. Bedonie, 913 F.2d 782, 794 (10th Cir. 1990) (“Section 1867(e) ‘provides the exclusive means for a party charged with a federal crime to challenge a jury.’”) (quoting United States v. Cooper, 733 F.2d 1360, 1366 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 (1984)), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1253 -5- (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel L. Ortiz
See United States v. Bedonie, 913 F.2d 782, 794 (10th Cir.1990) ("Section 1867(e) 'provides the exclusive means for a party charged with a federal crime to challenge a jury.' ") (quoting United States v. Cooper, 733 F.2d 1360, 1366 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 (1984)), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1253 (1991). 16 Section 1867(a) requires a party challenging the jury selection process to make his challenge by motion "before the voir dire examination begins, or within seven days after the defendant discovered or could have discovered, by the exercise of diligence, the grounds therefor, whi…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tomasita Eylicio-Montoya
See United States v. Cooper, 733 F.2d 1360, 1364 (10th Cir.) (“An arrest is justified only when there is probable cause to believe that a person has committed or is committing a crime.”), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 , 104 S.Ct. 3543 , 82 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Heriberto Farias-Torres, United States of America v. Maria Anita Orozco-Aguilar, United States of America v. Jose Gonzalez-Salas, AKA Jose Orozco
See United States v. Arbelaez, 719 F.2d 1453, 1458 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 (1984). 5 The evidence at trial established that on one occasion, Torres handed heroin wrapped in tin foil to a government agent and that on another occasion, Torres transported four and one-half pounds of methamphetamine and ten ounces of heroin worth approximately $100,000.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul Richard Arnpriester
See United States v. Arbelaez, 719 F.2d 1453, 1458-59 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Albert Miranda
See United States v. Arbelaez, 719 F.2d 1453 , 1461 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 , 104 S.Ct. 3543 , 82 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sebastian Ramirez, United States of America v. Leopoldo Manzo-Garcia, United States of America v. Perry Wagner
See United States v. Arbelaez, 719 F.2d 1453, 1457 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 (1984); Patterson, 819 F.2d at 1502 ; United States v. Disla, 805 F.2d 1340, 1349 (9th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
K N Energy, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Western Gas Resources, Inc., Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company, Intervenors
See Brief of Respondent at 19. *1303 While we owe the Commission substantial deference in matters predictive and economic, see, e.g., Black Citizens for a Fair Media v. FCC, 719 F.2d 407 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 , 104 S.Ct. 3545 , 82 L.Ed.2d 848 (1984); Community Nutrition Institute v. Young, 773 F.2d 1356 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1123 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986), we cannot ignore the Commission’s unwillingness to address an important challenge to its stated benefit rationale for charging transportation customers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lopez-Lima
See United States v. Pablo-Lugones, 725 F.2d 624, 626 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 , 104 S.Ct. 3543 , 82 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984); United States v. Dixon, 592 F.2d 329 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 951 , 99 S.Ct. 2179 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1056 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Brian Paul Johnson
See United States v. Cooper, 738 F.2d 1360 , 1364 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 , 104 S.Ct. 3543 , 82 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984); United States v. Obregon, 748 F.2d 1371, 1376 (10th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Keehner
(2×)
See United States v. Cooper, 733 F.2d 1360, 1364-65 (10th Cir.) (officer’s knowledge of defendant’s circumstantial links to prior suspicious activity in area of stop relevant in reasonableness balance), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 , 104 S.Ct. 3543 , 82 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications Commission
See, e.g., Black Citizens for a Fair Media v. Federal Communications Comm’n, 719 F.2d 407 , 417 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 , 104 S.Ct. 3545 , 82 L.Ed.2d 848 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company v. Federal Communications Commission
See, e.g., Black Citizens for a Fair Media v. Federal Communications Comm'n, 719 F.2d 407 , 417 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 , 104 S.Ct. 3545 , 82 L.Ed.2d 848 (1984). 41 However, this "predictive judgment" as to the possible future behavior of future marketplace entrants is highly suspect, makes little common sense, and the FCC provides to this Court nothing, no statistical data or even a general economic theory, to support its argument.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Casey v. Public Service Commission
See also Black Citizens for a Fair Media v. F.C.C., 719 F.2d 407 , 418 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 , 104 S.Ct. 3545 , 82 L.Ed.2d 848 (1984) (“[C]ourt[s] ‘defer[ ] ... to the expertise and experience of the [FCC] within its field of specialty^]’ ” (citation omitted)); Metropolitan Cleaning Corp., Inc. v. Crawley, 14 Va. App. 261 , 416 S.E.2d 35, 38 (1992) (quoting Bunton v. Eastern Fine Paper Co., 423 A.2d 512, 514 (Me.1980) (An administrative agency “‘acquires an expertise and accumulates an experience in [its] limited, specialized field often more extensive than th…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Begay
See also United States v. Arbelaez, 719 F.2d 1453, 1458 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 , 104 S.Ct. 3543 , 82 L.Ed.2d 847 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Begay
See also United States v. Arbelaez, 719 F.2d 1453, 1458 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 , 104 S.Ct. 3543 , 82 L.Ed.2d 847 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Guadalupe Acosta, United States of America v. Jesus Mariscales, United States of America v. Luis Fierro, United States of America v. Manuel Ruiz Alvarez
See also United States v. Adler, 879 F.2d 491, 495 (9th Cir.1989). 33 To establish the existence of a single conspiracy, as opposed to multiple conspiracies, we must determine whether there was " 'one overall agreement' to perform various functions to achieve the objectives of the conspiracy." United States v. Arbelaez, 719 F.2d 1453, 1457 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 (1984) (citation omitted).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lorenzo
See Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750, 754-55 , 66 S.Ct. 1239, 1242 , 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946); see also United States v. Arbelaez, 719 F.2d 1453, 1458 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 , 104 S.Ct. 3543 , 82 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Windyceslau D. Lorenzo, United States of America v. Roger Elvick, United States of America v. Nathan K. Brown, United States of America v. Ron Knutt, United States of America v. Thomas Porter
See Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750, 754-55 , 66 S.Ct. 1239, 1242 , 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946); see also United States v. Arbelaez, 719 F.2d 1453, 1458 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 , 104 S.Ct. 3543 , 82 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Saratoga Development Corp. v. United States
In such a setting, “we must be chary of substituting our own evaluation for that of the agency.” Braniff Airways, Inc. v. CAB, 379 F.2d 453, 463 (D.C.Cir.1967); see also Black Citizens for a Fair Media v. FCC, 719 F.2d 407 , 417 (D.C.Cir.1983) (“greater deference is given administrative bodies when their decisions are based upon ‘judgmental or predictive’ conclusions”), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 , 104 S.Ct. 3545 , 82 L.Ed.2d 848 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Steven Lujan
“A single conspiracy may involve several subagreements or subgroups of conspirators.” Bibbero, 749 F.2d at 587 (citation omitted); see also United States v. Arbelaez, 719 F.2d 1453, 1457-58 (9th Cir.1983) (evidence need only support a finding that a single conspiracy exists and need not exclude every hypothetical conspiracy), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 , 104 S.Ct. 3543 , 82 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sidney R. Bell, United States of America v. Scott J. Ziebarth
(2×)
See also United States v. Santillanes, 848 F.2d 1103, 1106 (10th Cir.1988) (citing United States v. Cooper, 733 F.2d 1360, 1363 (10th Cir.1984)), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 , 104 S.Ct. 3543 , 82 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984) and United States v. Espinosa, 782 F.2d 888, 890 (10th Cir.1986), (recognizing three types of police-citizen encounters).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Albert Marchini
United States v. Seawell, 583 F.2d 416, 417-18 (9th Cir.) (virtually identical Allen instruction, footnote 2; citing cases, footnote 3), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 991 , 99 S.Ct. 591 , 58 L.Ed.2d 666 (1978); see also United States v. Arbelaez, 719 F.2d 1453, 1461 (9th Cir.1983) (upholding Allen charge), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 , 104 S.Ct. 3543 , 82 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pablo-Lugones
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-6735.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 18, 1984.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.